World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Communist Party of New Zealand

Communist Party of New Zealand
Founded 1921
Dissolved 1994
Succeeded by Socialist Unity Party (1966)
Organisation for Marxist Unity (1975)
Socialist Workers Organization (1994)
Ideology Communism
Political position Far-left
Colours      Red
Politics of New Zealand
Political parties

The Communist Party of New Zealand (CPNZ) was a Industrial Workers of the World in the Auckland region, and a network of impossiblist study groups of miners on the west coast of the South Island.

Never high on the list of priorities of the Communist International, the CPNZ was considered an appendage of the Communist Party of Australia until 1928, when it began to function as a fully independent national party. Party membership remained small, only briefly topping the 1,000 mark, with its members subjected to government repression and isolated by expulsions from the mainstream labour movement concentrated in the New Zealand Labour Party.

During the period of the Sino-Soviet split of the 1960s, the CPNZ sided with the Chinese government headed by Mao Tse-tung. The party splintered into a multiplicity of tiny political parties after 1966 and no longer exists as an independent group.


  • History 1
    • Background 1.1
    • Establishment 1.2
    • Early years 1.3
    • Third Period (1928-1935) 1.4
    • "Freemanisation" 1.5
    • Popular Front period and World War II 1.6
    • Post-war era 1.7
    • Sino-Soviet split 1.8
    • Later evolution 1.9
    • Termination 1.10
  • Membership 2
  • Electoral results (1935 & 1946–1969) 3
  • Footnotes 4
  • Further reading 5
  • Archival holdings 6



Richard Seddon (1845-1906), Prime Minister of New Zealand from 1893 until his death in 1906, oversaw implementation of an array of social welfare programs as leader of the Liberal Government

As the 20th Century dawned, New Zealand was recognised by adherents of International Socialism around the globe as a sort of laboratory test case of social democratic government in practice. One June 1901 pamphlet put to print by J.A. Wayland, proprietor of the mass circulation socialist weekly Appeal to Reason, detailed the ways in which the island nation of 720,000 had already passed extensive legislation for the benefit of wage workers, backed by 200 agents of the "Labour Intelligence Department."[1] While the country was declared "no Utopia," New Zealand nevertheless was said to have "no real want" and "no unemployment problem to solve."[1] Instead trade unions were not merely formally recognized but were pervasive and had managed to mitigate the class struggle through arbitration laws sanctioned by law, with disputes decided by three member courts of arbitration, each including representatives of capital, labour, and the courts as provided in the 1894 Industrial Conciliation and Arbitration Act.[2]

An extensive system of public works were in existence, governed by the principle of "fair work and fair pay."[3] More than 200 employment bureaus dotted the country, connecting every willing worker with a job.[4] Sweatshops were banned, as was systematic home manufacturing, with mandatory labeling of all products made outside of factories.[4] Wages were generally high and the 48-hour week said to be a local maximum.[5] The presence of "tramps" had been eliminated through town allotments of small homesteads to poor workers, granted through easily affordable perpetual leases.[6] The power of eminent domain had been assumed by the New Zealand parliament in 1896, allowing the state to assume ownership of large estates at their assessed price for division into small farms.[7]

State finance had been accomplished by a tax on land values and the establishment of a progressive income tax.[8] The national government itself owned and operated the railways, telegraph and telephone systems, schools, and postal savings banks throughout the country even before the landmark election of 1891.[9] Workers' compensation insurance to protect against injury was required by law, and low cost life insurance had been provided by the state since 1869. Old age pensions were provided to all New Zealanders 65 years of age or older who had been resident in the country for at least 25 years.[10]

"The New Zealanders are collectivists, although they adhere to the old party names of liberals and tories," the American examiners enthused, with the New Zealand Liberal Party reckoned as equivalent to the Fabian socialists of Great Britain.[10]

This idyllic vision — which incidentally paid no attention to the treatment of or conditions endured by the indigenous Polynesian population — proved to be short-lived. With the eruption of World War I in 1914, New Zealand was dragged into the European bloodbath. Over 120,000 New Zealanders were enlisted in the New Zealand Expeditionary Force, with about 100,000 men and women eventually serving as soldiers and nurses in Europe, out of a population of 1.14 million.[11] Of these, about 18,000 were killed in battle and another 41,000 felled by wounds or disease — a casualty rate approaching 60%.[11] Conscription was introduced in 1916, with the stream of volunteer enthusiasts exhausted.[12] As casualties continued to mount into 1917, public war-weariness set in, fueling political discontent.[12] A revolutionary socialist movement began to emerge.


West Coast American edition of Lenin's The Soviets at Work (1919), an influential political tract among NZ revolutionary socialist activists.

There were isolated reflections of international radical tendencies present in New Zealand from shortly after the turn of the 20th Century. The

  • "Inventory of the Records of the Communist Party of New Zealand, 1924-1972." Manuscripts and Archives Collection A-9, University of Auckland Library, Auckland. —Finding aid.
  • "Communist Party of New Zealand, Otago Branch: description," Collection #MS-0675. Hocken Collections, University of Otago, Dunedin.

Archival holdings

  • R.H. Brookes, "The CPNZ and the Sino-Soviet Split," Political Science [Wellington], vol. 17, no. 2 (Sept. 1965).
  • Julie M. Hynes, The Communist Party in Otago, 1940-1947. Thesis. University of Otago, 1979.
  • Marxists Internet Archive, "Sketch of Organisational Developments in New Zealand (1966-2013)," Encyclopedia of Anti-Revisionism On-Line, Marxists Internet Archive, n.d. [2013].
  • Ray Nunes (ed.), The Making of a New Zealand Revolutionary: Reminiscences of Alex Galbraith. Auckland: Workers' Party of New Zealand, 1994.
  • Joseph Robert Powell, The History of a Working Class Party, 1918-40. MA Thesis. Wellington: Victoria University College, 1949.
  • Ian Powell, The Communist Left and the Labour Movement in Christchurch up until the 1935 General Election. MA Thesis, University of Canterbury, 2004.
  • Herbert Roth, "The Communist Vote in New Zealand," Political Science [Wellington], vol. 17, no. 2 (Sept. 1965).
  • Ron Smith, Working Class Son: My Fight Against Capitalism and War: Memoirs of Ron Smith, a New Zealand Communist. Self-published, 1994.
  • S.W. Smith, Rebel in a Wrong Cause. Auckland: Collins, 1960.
  • Kerry Taylor, "Kiwi Comrades: The Social Basis of New Zealand Communism, 1921-1948." in Kevin Morgan et al. (eds.), Agents of Revolution: New Biographical Approaches to the History of Communism. Bern: Peter Lang, 2005.
  • Kerry Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period" in Matthew Worley (ed.), In Search of Revolution: International Communist Parties and the Third Period. London: I.B. Tauris, 2004.
  • Kerry Taylor, "'Jack' McDonald: A Canadian Revolutionary in New Zealand," Labour / Le Travail, no. 32 (Fall 1993), pp. 261–268.
  • Kerry Taylor, On the Left: Essays on Socialism in New Zealand. Edited with Pat Moloney. Dunedin: University of Otago Press, 2002.
  • Kerry Taylor, "'Our Motto, No Compromise': The Ideological Origins and Foundation of the Communist Party of New Zealand," New Zealand Journal of History, vol. 28, no. 2 (October 1994), pp. 160–177.
  • A. C. Wilson, New Zealand and the Soviet Union, 1950-1991: A Brittle Relationship." Wellington, NZ: Victoria University Press, 2004.

Further reading

  1. ^ a b New Zealand in a Nutshell. Wayland's Monthly No. 14. Girard, KS: J.A. Wayland, June 1901; pp. 5-6.
  2. ^ New Zealand in a Nutshell, pp. 7, 21.
  3. ^ New Zealand in a Nutshell, pg. 7.
  4. ^ a b New Zealand in a Nutshell, pg. 8.
  5. ^ New Zealand in a Nutshell, pg. 9.
  6. ^ New Zealand in a Nutshell, pp. 10-11.
  7. ^ New Zealand in a Nutshell, pg. 11.
  8. ^ New Zealand in a Nutshell, pp. 12-13.
  9. ^ New Zealand in a Nutshell, pp. 15-17, 34.
  10. ^ a b New Zealand in a Nutshell, pg. 19.
  11. ^ a b "First World War - Overview," History Group of the New Zealand Ministry for Culture and Heritage, pg. 1.
  12. ^ a b "First World War - Overview," pg. 5.
  13. ^ Kerry Taylor, "'Our Motto, No Compromise': The Ideological Origins and Foundation of the Communist Party of New Zealand," New Zealand Journal of History, vol. 28, no. 2 (October 1994), pg. 162.
  14. ^ a b Taylor, "'Our Motto, No Compromise,'" pp. 162-163.
  15. ^ a b c d e f g h Herbert Roth, "New Zealand," in Witold S. Sworakowski (ed.), World Communism: A Handbook, 1918-1965. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, 1973; pg. 337.
  16. ^ a b Taylor, "'Our Motto, No Compromise,'" pg. 168.
  17. ^ a b Taylor, "'Our Motto, No Compromise,'" pp. 170-171.
  18. ^ Kerry Taylor, "Kiwi Comrades: The Social Basis of New Zealand Communism, 1921-1948." in Kevin Morgan et al. (eds.), Agents of Revolution: New Biographical Approaches to the History of Communism. Bern: Peter Lang, 2005; pg. 281.
  19. ^ Roth, "New Zealand," pp. 337-338.
  20. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Roth, "New Zealand," pg. 338.
  21. ^ Taylor, "'Our Motto, No Compromise,'" pg. 172.
  22. ^ a b c d Kerry Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period, 1928-35," in Matthew Worley (ed.), In Search of Revolution: International Communist Parties in the Third Period. London: I.B. Tauris, 2004; pg. 270.
  23. ^ a b "Resolution on the Tasks of the Communist Party of New Zealand," RGASPI fond 495, opis 20, delo 430; quoted in Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 274.
  24. ^ a b Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 277.
  25. ^ Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 274.
  26. ^ Letter from the Political Secretariat of ECCI to CPNZ, 4 March 1930, RGASPI f. 495, op. 20 d. 430; quoted in Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 274.
  27. ^ a b c d e Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 278.
  28. ^ a b Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 279.
  29. ^ Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 282.
  30. ^ a b c d e f Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 288.
  31. ^ Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pp. 288-289.
  32. ^ Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 289.
  33. ^ Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pp. 289-290.
  34. ^ Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 290.
  35. ^ Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 292.
  36. ^ Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 284.
  37. ^ Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 293.
  38. ^ Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pp. 293-294.
  39. ^ Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 294.
  40. ^ Roth, "New Zealand," pp. 338-339.
  41. ^ a b c Roth, "New Zealand," pg. 339.
  42. ^ a b


Election candidates seats won votes percentage
1935 4 0 600 0.07
1946 3 0 1,181 0.11
1949 16 0 3,499 0.33
1951 4 0 528 0.05
1954 8 0 1,134 0.05
1957 5 0 706 0.06
1960 19 0 2,423 0.21
1963 23 0 3,167 0.26
1966 9 0 1,207 0.10
1969 4 0 418 0.03

Electoral results (1935 & 1946–1969)

Year Membership Notes
1926 120 Per Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 284.
1927 105 Per Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 284.
1928 79 Per Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 284.
1929 Decline due to loss of West Coast miners.
1930 62 "All-time low." Per Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 284.
1931 81 Actually a Jan. 1932 count. Per Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 284.
1932 129 Year end figure. Per Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 284.
1934 246 Per Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 284.
1935 280 June count. Per Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 284.
1936 353 Actually a Dec. 1935 count. Per Taylor, "The Communist Party of New Zealand and the Third Period," pg. 284.


The CPNZ never had mass influence or real political power, but it did politically influence several generations of radicals and stimulated several important social movements, including the unemployed workers' movement in the 1930s depression, Halt All Racist Tours (HART) and the Progressive Youth Movement (PYM).

After the collapse of Communism in Albania, the Communist Party of New Zealand gradually changed its views, renouncing its former support of Socialist Worker (Aotearoa). However, most of the ISO members split off again, and resumed their own organization.

Meanwhile, other former members of the CPNZ in Wellington, where the party branch had been expelled en masse in 1970, founded the Wellington Marxist Leninist Organisation, which in 1980 merged with the Northern Communist Organisation to form the Workers Communist League (WCL).

Later, when Mao died and Preparatory Committee for the Formation of the Communist Party of New Zealand (Marxist–Leninist).

Next, in the early 1960s, the party experienced more internal strife due to the Sino-Soviet split. The party was divided between supporters of the Soviet Union under Nikita Khrushchev and those who claimed Khrushchev was a "revisionist" and chose instead to follow China under Mao Zedong. Subsequently, the CPNZ became the first official communist party in the First World to side with Mao. The majority of the party and its newspaper The People's Voice adopted Maoism, while supporters of Khrushchev's Soviet Union (mainly Auckland trade unionists) split off to form the Socialist Unity Party.

After the Hungarian Revolution of 1956 was crushed by Soviet forces, most of the intellectuals the CPNZ had attracted left the party while some erstwhile supporters founded new journals such as New Zealand Monthly Review, Comment, Socialist Forum and Here & Now.


Later evolution

Sino-Soviet split

The Communist Party stood candidates in general elections from the 1946 election to the 1969 election; particularly in the 1949 election, the 1960 election and the 1963 election; and in 3 by-elections; Brooklyn 1951 by-election, Grey Lynn 1963 by-election, and Otahuhu 1963 by-election. Candidates stood frequently in the Christchurch Central electorate (7 elections) and the Island Bay electorate (8 elections; often Ronald Smith). The highest vote was 534 for V G Wilcox in the Arch Hill electorate in the 1946 election.[42]

Post-war era

A Communist Party candidate stood in the Auckland West 1940 by-election held after Savage's death, although after the low number of votes received in the 1935 election, no Communist Party candidates stood in the 1938 election or the 1943 election.

The tide turned in June 1941 following the Nazi invasion of the Soviet Union. At that time, in accord with Soviet foreign policy, the CPNZ became vocal supporters of the war effort, which combined with the country's new status of military allies with the Soviet Union paved the way for the New Zealand party's growth in membership and influence.[41] By 1945 party membership reached its all-time high of approximately 2,000, while circulation of People's Voice topped 14,000 copies per week.[41] This level of membership and support would continue through 1946, when new international circumstances would arise leading to the CPNZ's inexorable attrition.[41]

In the summer of 1939 the CPNZ came into conflict with the government in the aftermath of the Molotov–Ribbentrop Pact, to which the party responded with anti-war rhetoric while the governments of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union carved up spheres of influence in Europe. Tensions worsened in 1940, when the Great Britain came under attack — a country to which New Zealanders felt a particular national affinity. Although membership in the CPNZ remained legal, People's Voice was suppressed by the government.[40]

In 1938 CPNZ headquarters were moved from the capital city of Wellington to the booming northern port city of Auckland and a new weekly was launched there in July 1939, People's Voice.[20] This headquarter city and official organ would remain constant for the rest of the party's institutional life.

Dissatisfaction with Freeman's commanding leadership style grew in 1935 and 1936 and he landed on the wrong side of the Popular Front-driven Comintern decision that the CPNZ should seek formal affiliation with the Labour Party sooner rather than later.[37] Freeman came to be politically isolated, with the Auckland district of the party, backed by Lance Sharkey of the Communist Party of Australia, leading the charge for his removal as an alleged impediment to the new international line.[38] Freeman was removed from the party leadership late in 1936, suspended from the party soon thereafter for failing to accept this decision, and ultimately expelled late in 1937.[39]

The Communist Party of New Zealand had shown growth over the years of the Third Period, with the party's delegate to the 7th World Congress of the Comintern in Moscow, Leo Sim (pseudonym: Andrews), reporting there that party membership had increased by 600% from 1928 to 1935.[20] The reality was modest, with the party failing to achieve a membership of 400 — results which only were promising when compared to the nadir of the late 1920s.[36]

Popular Front period and World War II

The CPNZ responded to the tacit rejection of their appeal by accelerating their efforts to drive a wedge between the rank and file and leadership of each of these organizations, a tactic euphemistically called the "United Front from Below."[34] The distrust and alienation between the Communist Party and the Labour Party leadership carried over through the November 1935 general election, during which the CPNZ made use of the slogan "Neither Reaction nor Labour" in the campaign.[20] The 1935 election ultimately resulted in a massive victory for the Labour Party, bringing it to power for the first time, and a grave failure for the CPNZ in its electoral efforts, with all four of the party's candidates faring so poorly at the polls that they failed to recover their electoral deposits.[35]

Comintern policy began to change in 1933 following the disastrous victory of the Nazi Party in Germany, leading to eventual advocacy of a so-called Popular Front against fascism by 1935. Under the Freeman leadership the CPNZ took the first tentative steps in this direction late in 1933 when the CPNZ approached the National Executive Committee of the New Zealand Labour Party with a proposal for a joint campaign against fascism.[32] No answer was given. Parallel appeals were made to several key trade unions, including the Miners, Seamen, and Dockworkers, with only the Miners providing a response.[33]

The operations of the CPNZ came to resemble those of larger and more efficient communist parties in other countries, with official directives and circulars issued systematically for the first time by the Central Committee to local party committees.[30] Representatives of the Central Committee also began to travel regularly to visit local party organisations.[30] Dues collecting and record keeping of branches was made more regular and increased attention was paid to the problem of internal security in an effort to stave the crippling series of arrests that had swept the party.[31]

[30] This group of four would dominate CPNZ politics through the end of 1935.[30] The New Zealand-born [30]Karl Marx and the Struggle of the Masses. By the middle of 1933, the Communist Party of New Zealand was in crisis, with its entire Central Committee jailed for publication of the pamphlet


The CPNZ also lost its influence in the country's trade unions during the late 1920s and early 1930s owing to its rigid support for unpopular secondary strikes in solidarity with workers in other countries. This was epitomized by a 1929 call for a miners' strike in sympathy with mine and timber workers in Australia, which annihilated party influence among the miners of the South Island's West Coast and 1931 efforts to blackball a Japanese ship, which led to discord and alienation from the party in the Seamen's Union.[29]

The party was further disorganized by the churn of its rank-and-file members in and out of the party, exemplified by the count of Wellington members booming from 51 in March to 80 by May 1931 before plummeting to just 25 in January 1932.[27] Things grew so bad that by October 1932 only one member of the Central Executive Committee had been a member of the party for longer than a year, with some members for as little as two months.[27] The party was impoverished, its coffers drained both by the cost of producing the Red Worker (rival publication to the mainstream trade unionist Maoriland Worker), and by courtroom losses in several libel cases brought against that publication.[27] Party publications were carefully scrutinized, with two issues of the Red Worker and a pamphlet found to be seditious in 1932 and those responsible for their publication jailed for more than a year.[28]

The CPNZ was beset by rapid membership turnover throughout the late 1920s and early 1930s, with General Secretary Griffin accused of operating a personal dictatorship, spurring rank-and-file discontent.[27] The CPNZ was also subjected to unrelenting police operations by the national government, including a July 1929 raid which seized the internal records and literature of the Wellington branch and the subsequent successful prosecution of five members of the governing Central Executive Committee for possession and sale of allegedly seditious literature.[27] Party leaders were particularly targeted, with three more members of the Central Executive Committee arrested in 1930, four more in 1931 and 1932, and all seven members in 1933.[28]

It was only in March 1930 that the CPNZ received a communication from ECCI directing it to take on ultra-radical policies in accord the Third Period analysis.[25] The party's previous policies were deemed incorrect and the CPNZ was instructed to attempt to assume leadership of the New Zealand workers movement by working to "expose and destroy all the Labourite, pacifist, social democratic illusions about the possibility of solving social problems...under the existing political and economic regime."[26] This marked the actual beginning of sectarian Third Period tactics in New Zealand.

Dick Griffin became the first full-time organiser of the CPNZ in May 1929.[24] In August of that same year he assumed the role of General Secretary of the organisation.[24]

The 6th Congress of the Comintern is remembered for its launch of the ultra-radical analysis and tactics of the so-called Third Period, which posited the rapid decay of capitalism and the acceleration of the class struggle and coming of potential revolutionary situations. While in many countries this meant directives to immediately shatter joint work with social democratic political and trade union leaders, the Comintern's "Resolution on the Tasks of the Communist Party of New Zealand," brought back to Wellington by Griffin, maintained that New Zealand was still marked by "the steady upward swing of capitalist development, combined with relatively good conditions for the workers," thereby serving to "prevent the possibility of a general revolutionary situation in New Zealand."[23] Instead of consolidating itself for an envisioned revolutionary uprising, the CPNZ was directed to concentrate its attention on continued agitation and propaganda.[23]

Previously considered an insignificant adjunct of the Communist Party of Australia in the eyes of the Executive Committee of the Communist International (ECCI), early in 1928 the CPNZ received a cable from Moscow requesting that the party dispatch a delegate to the forthcoming 6th World Congress of the Comintern.[22] Twenty-eight-year-old Wellington activist Dick Griffin, a member of the Seamen's Union, was chosen as the party's first ever delegate to a Comintern gathering in Moscow.[22] Griffin traveled circuitously to the Soviet Union, with his ocean voyage going first to Australia before heading to Great Britain via the Suez Canal.[22] British authorities were aware of his presence by the time he arrived, detaining him for questioning and seizing documents, but Griffin was allowed to depart in time to reach Moscow prior to the 17 July opening of the World Congress.[22]

Map of New Zealand showing towns and cities of importance to the history of the early CPNZ.

Third Period (1928-1935)

The party did not operate in a vacuum but was rather the object of official scrutiny from the start with the New Zealand Police and New Zealand Army both engaged in the systematic monitoring of radical activists, including those suspected of "using their influence to establish Bolshevism."[21]

Total membership of the party remained tiny in this period, with the CPNZ counting fewer than 100 members.[20] Despite its small size, the party nevertheless managed to exert a degree of influence within the national Miners' and Seamen's Unions.[20]

This situation continued through all of 1925, only ending the year after following a six-month organising tour by Australian activist Norman Jeffrey.[20] In April 1926 a new monthly magazine was launched for the New Zealand communist movement, The Workers' Vanguard, published in the isolated inland mining town of Blackball, located on the rainy Western side of the South Island.[20] A return to independence of the New Zealand party shortly followed and by the end of 1926 headquarters of the CPNZ were moved from Wellington to Blackball.[20] They would remain there until returned to the North Island and the capital city in 1928.

[20], at which it was decided to make the CPNZ a subordinate section of the larger Australian party.Communist Party of Australia A conference was consequently held during the 1924 Christmas break, attended by delegates of the [20] Unable to take over the newspaper of the

The CPNZ participated in elections for the first time in 1923, with its inaugural candidate drawing an impressive 2,128 votes in a race for election to the Dunedin city council.[15]

In contrast to demographic findings made of the early Communist Party of America, for example, the Communist movement in New Zealand was never dominated by Slavic, Scandinavian, and Jewish emigrants from the former Russian empire, with one academic study showing that a big majority of the movement's participants during the decade of the 1920s were either native New Zealanders by birth or first generation immigrants from Great Britain, Scotland, Ireland, or Wales.[18]

West Coast Communist Party members in 1922.

Early years


"The foundation of the CPNZ will always remain shrouded in a degree of mystery. No direct record of the event survives — the minutes have long since been lost and no reports appeared in the media at the time.... The precise nature of the discussion and debate is obscure but the delegates had before them the constitution of the Communist Party of Australia and a draft manifesto and constitution drawn up over the previous few months by members of the Wellington Socialist Party."[17]

Of the origins of the Communist Party, historian Kerry Taylor writes:

[17] By 1921 sentiment had begun to build for the establishment of a communist political party along those lines advocated by the fledglin

[16] Adding to the complexity of the fragmented radical movement was the Wellington Socialist Party, formerly a branch of the NZSP which had split with the national organization in 1913 over the issue of electoral politics. While the main body of the NZSP had gone on to found the

Visiting the Pacific Coast cities of San Francisco and Vancouver, Feary and his co-thinkers obtained copies of a number of influential publications, including Ten Days That Shook the World, a participant's account of the October Revolution by John Reed, and The Soviets at Work, a widely reprinted pamphlet by Lenin.[15] These were successfully smuggled back to New Zealand, with the Lenin tract immediately put into print in yet another new edition.[15]

[15] Particularly worthy of note were a small network of

Others adhered to the theories of Daniel DeLeon, which advocated the use of the ballot box for a revolutionary transformation of society leading to a socialist state governed by revolutionary industrial unions.[14] From 1911 the ideas of syndicalism began to gain a foothold in the Auckland area under the banner of the Industrial Workers of the World, while the anti-political impossibilist ideas of the Socialist Party of Great Britain made their mark upon others.[14] All of these tendencies would contribute adherents to the pioneer New Zealand communist movement.


This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.