World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Ananda Mahidol

Ananda Mahidol
King Rama VIII
King of Thailand
Reign 2 March 1935 – 9 June 1946
Predecessor Prajadhipok (Rama VII)
Successor Bhumibol Adulyadej (Rama IX)
Regent Regency Council (1935–1944)
Pridi Banomyong (1944–1945)
Prime Ministers
Born (1925-09-20)20 September 1925
Heidelberg, Republic of Baden, Weimar Republic
Died 9 June 1946(1946-06-09) (aged 20)
Grand Palace, Phra Nakhon, Thailand
House House of Mahidol
Chakri Dynasty
Father Mahidol Adulyadej, Prince of Songkla
Mother Srinagarindra
Religion Buddhism

King Ananda Mahidol (Thai: อานันทมหิดล; rtgsAnanthamahidon; 20 September 1925 – 9 June 1946) was the eighth monarch of Thailand from the House of Chakri. At the time he was recognised as king by the National Assembly in March 1935, he was a nine-year-old boy living in Switzerland. He returned to Thailand in December 1945, but six months later in June 1946, he was found shot dead in his bed. Although at first thought to have been an accident, medical examiners ruled it a murder and three royal pages were later executed following very irregular trials. The mysterious circumstances surrounding his death have been the subject of much controversy.


  • Name 1
  • Early life 2
    • Circumstances of succession 2.1
  • Reign 3
    • World War II 3.1
    • Post war 3.2
  • Death 4
    • Events of 9 June 1946 4.1
    • Aftermath 4.2
    • Alternative explanations of the death 4.3
      • Bhumibol Adulyadej 4.3.1
      • Seni Pramoj and the Democrat Party 4.3.2
      • Pridi Phanomyong 4.3.3
      • Plaek Pibulsonggram 4.3.4
      • Keith Simpson 4.3.5
      • William Stevenson 4.3.6
      • Rayne Kruger 4.3.7
      • Paul Handley 4.3.8
  • Tributes to King Ananda 5
  • Titles and styles 6
  • Ancestors 7
  • See also 8
  • References 9
  • External links 10


Ananda Mahidol (Thai: อานันทมหิดล) is one word in Thai and is his given name. King Vajiravudh, his uncle, sent a telegram on 13 October 1925 giving him this name. It is pronounced "Ananta Mahidon" and means "the joy of Mahidol" (his father). When he held his birth rank of "mom chao—"the lowest rank of Thai princes—he used the surname "Mahidol", his father's given name. His full name and title was thus, "Mom Chao Ananda Mahidol Mahidol" (Thai: หม่อมเจ้า อานันทมหิดล มหิดล). His full royal name was "Phra Bat Somdet Phra Poramentharamaha Ananda Mahidol Phra Atthama Ramathibodindara" (Thai: พระบาทสมเด็จพระปรเมนทรมหาอานันทมหิดลฯ พระอัฐมรามาธิบดินทร); RTGS: —Ananthamahidon Phra Atthamaramathibodin), or Rama VIII.

Early life

Prince Ananda Mahidol Mahidol was born in Heidelberg, Germany. He was the first son of Prince Mahidol Adulyadej of Songkhla (son of King Chulalongkorn) and Mom Sangwal (last title Somdej Phra Sri Nakarindhara Boromaratchachonnani) who were studying there at the time.

He went with his parents to Paris, Lausanne, and then to Massachusetts, when in 1927, his uncle, King Prajadhipok, issued a royal edict elevating him to the higher princely class of Phra Worawong Ther Phra Ong Chao (this edict also benefited other "Mom Chao" who were the children of Chao Fa and their commoner wives, among them his elder sister Mom Chao Galyani Vadhana and his younger brother who was born later that year Phra Worawong Ther Phra Ong Chao Bhumibol Adulyadej).

The family returned to Thailand in 1928 after Prince Mahidol finished his medical studies at Harvard University. Prince Mahidol died at age 37 in 1929, when Ananda Mahidol was just four years old. His widowed mother was thus left to raise her family alone.

A coup d'état in 1932 ended the absolute monarchy and raised the possibility that King Prajadhipok might abdicate. Queen Savang Vadhana, his grandmother, was concerned about Prince Ananda Mahidol's safety, since he was one of the likely heirs to the throne. It was then suggested that Mom Sangwal and her children return to Lausanne, and when they did so in 1933, the official reason given was for the health and further education of the princes.

Prince Ananda Mahidol spent most of his youth in Switzerland, however, when King Prajadhipok's abdication appeared imminent, the Prince's mother was approached by a member of government, asking for her opinion about Ananda Mahidol succeeding as monarch.

Circumstances of succession

Photograph of the King in 1939
See also King Prajadhipok's circumstance of succession

King Prajadhipok (Rama VII) abdicated in 1935 due to political quarrels with the new quasi-democratic government as well as health problems. The King decided to abstain from exercising his prerogative to name a successor to the throne. By that time, the crown had already passed from Prince Mahidol's line to that of his half-brothers when his eldest full brother, Crown Prince Maha Vajirunhis, died as a teenager during King Chulalongkorn's reign. A half-brother, Prince Vajiravudh (as the next eldest) replaced Prince Vajirunhis as the Crown Prince he eventually succeeded to the throne in 1910 as King Rama VI. In 1924 the King instituted the Palace Law of Succession in order to govern subsequent successions. The law gave priority to the children of his mother Queen Regent Saovabha Bongsri over the children of King Chulalongkorn's two other royal wives. The law was enacted on the death of King Vajiravudh in 1925 – the crown was passed to his youngest brother, Prince Prajadhipok of Sukhothai.

Offering the throne to Prince Prajadhipok was not without a debate. In doing so, another candidate was bypassed: Prince Chula Chakrabongse, son of the late Field Marshal Prince Chakrabongse Bhuvanath of Phitsanulok, who before his death had been the heir-apparent to King Vajiravudh. It was questioned whether the Succession Law enacted by King Vajiravudh actually barred Prince Chakrabongse Bhuvanath (and for that matter, Prince Chula Chakrabongse) from succession on the ground that he married a foreigner (Ukrainian). However, his marriage had taken place before this law was enacted and had been endorsed by King Chulalongkorn himself. There was no clear resolution, but in the end the many candidates were passed over and Prince Prajadhipok was enthroned.

When King Prajadhipok later abdicated, since he was the last remaining son of Queen Saovabha, the crown went back to the sons of the Queen whose rank was next to hers: Queen Savang Vadhana, mother of the late Crown Prince Vajirunahis. Besides the late Crown Prince, she had two more sons who survived to adulthood: Prince Sommatiwongse Varodaya of Nakhon Si Thammarat, who had died without a son in 1899, and Prince Mahidol who, although deceased, had two living sons. It thus appeared that Prince Ananda Mahidol would be the first person in the royal line of succession.

Nevertheless, the same debate over the half-foreign Prince Chula Chakrabongse occurred again. It was argued that King Vajiravudh had virtually exempted the Prince's father from the ban in the Succession Law, and the crown might thus be passed to him.

However, since the kingdom was now governed under a constitution, it was the Cabinet who would decide. Opinion was split on the right to succession of Prince Chula Chakrabongse. A key figure was Pridi Phanomyong, who persuaded the Cabinet that the Law should be interpreted as excluding the Prince from succession, and that Prince Ananda Mahidol should be the next king. It also appeared more convenient for the government to have a monarch who was only nine years old and studying in Switzerland. On 2 March 1935 Prince Ananda Mahidol was elected by the National Assembly and the Thai government to succeed his uncle, King Prajadhipok, as the Eighth King of the Chakri Dynasty.


As the new King was still a child and was then studying in Switzerland, the National Assembly appointed Colonel Prince Anuwatjaturong, Lieutenant Commander Prince Artit Thip-apa, and Chao Phraya Yommaraj (Pun Sukhum) as his regents.

In 1938, at age thirteen, Ananda Mahidol visited the Kingdom of Siam for the first time as its monarch. The King was accompanied during his visit by his mother and his younger brother, Bhumibol Adulyadej. Field Marshal Plaek Pibulsonggram was Prime Minister at the time and during most of Ananda Mahidol's brief reign (Pibulsonggram is remembered for being a military dictator and, in 1939, for changing the name of the country from Siam to Thailand). Late in 1940, Pibulsonggram involved Thailand in the indecisive "Franco–Thai War" against the Vichy forces in French Indochina.

Ananda Mahidol on a stamp

World War II

On 8 December 1941, in concert with the attack on Pearl Harbor, Japanese forces invaded and occupied Thailand. Ananda Mahidol was away from the country and Pridi Phanomyong served as regent in his absence. From 24 January 1942, occupied Thailand became a formal ally of the Empire of Japan and a member of the Axis. Under Plaek Pibulsonggram, Thailand declared war on the Allied powers. The regent refused to sign the declaration and it was thus legally invalid. Many members of the Thai Government, including the Siamese embassy in Japan, acted as 'de facto' spies in the Seri Thai underground on the side of the Allies, funneling secret information to the Office of Strategic Services.

By 1944, it was becoming apparent that Japan was going to lose the war. Bangkok suffered heavily from the Allied bombing raids. These, plus economic hardships, made the war and the government of Plaek Pibulsonggram very unpopular. In July, Plaek Pibulsonggram was ousted by the Seri Thai-infiltrated government. The National Assembly reconvened and appointed the liberal lawyer Khuang Aphaiwong as Prime Minister. Japan surrendered on 15 August 1945, and Allied military responsibility for Thailand fell to Britain.

Post war

If all Thai people know they are owners of the nation and each one discharges their duties accordingly and according to right principles, then the difficulties of the nation will pass away. Thus spoke King Ananda Mahidol, A.D. 1925–1946

Only after the end of World War II could Ananda Mahidol return to Thailand. He returned for a second visit in December 1945 with a degree in Law. Despite his youth and inexperience, he quickly won the hearts of the Thai people, who had continued to revere the monarchy through the upheavals of the 1930s and 1940s. He was a handsome young man and the Thai were delighted to have their King amongst them once again. One of his well-remembered activities was a highly successful visit to Bangkok's Chinatown Sam Peng Lane (ซอยสำเพ็ง), which was intended to defuse the post-war tensions that lingered between Bangkok's ethnic Chinese and Thai people.[1]

Foreign observers, however, believed that Ananda Mahidol did not really want to be King and felt his reign would not last long.


On 9 June 1946, the King was found shot dead in his bedroom in the Boromphiman Throne Hall, (a modern residential palace located within the Grand Palace), only four days before he was scheduled to return to Switzerland to finish his doctoral degree in Law at the University of Lausanne.

Events of 9 June 1946

The Boromphiman Throne Hall, located within the Grand Palace. The King's bedroom is on the upper floor.

Keith Simpson, pathologist to the British Home Office and founding chairman of the Department of Forensic Medicine at Guy's Hospital in London, performed a forensic analysis of the King's death and recounted the following sequence of events on the morning of 9 June 1946:[2]

Ananda was awakened by his mother at 6 am.

At 7.30 am, his Page (occupation) But Pathamasarin came on duty and began preparing a breakfast table on a balcony adjoining the king's dressing room.

At 8.30 am, But saw the king standing in his dressing room. He brought the king his customary glass of orange juice a few minutes later. However, by then the king had gone back to bed and refused the juice.

At 8.45 am, the king's other page, Chit Singhaseni appeared, saying he had been called to measure the King's medals and decorations on behalf of a jeweller who was making a case for them.

At 9 am, Prince Bhumibol Adulyadej visited King Ananda. He said afterwards that he had found the king dozing in his bed.

At 9.20 am, a single shot rang out from the king's bedroom. Chit ran in and then ran out along the corridor to the apartment of the king's mother, crying "The King has shot!"

The king's mother followed Chit into the king's bedroom and found the king lying face up in bed, bloodied from a wound to the head.


Monarchs of
the Chakri Dynasty
(Rama I)
(Rama II)
(Rama III)
(Rama IV)
(Rama V)
(Rama VI)
(Rama VII)
Ananda Mahidol
(Rama VIII)
Bhumibol Adulyadej
(Rama IX)

An initial radio announcement on 9 June surmised that the King was accidentally killed while toying with his pistol.[3]

Soon after the death, the Democrat Party spread rumours that Pridi Banomyong was behind the death.[4]

In October 1946, a Commission of Inquiry reported that the King's death could not have been accidental, but that neither suicide nor murder was satisfactorily proved.

In November 1947, Field Marshal Plaek Pibulsonggram staged a coup against the elected government of Pridi, appointed Democrat Party leader Khuang Aphaiwong as Prime Minister, and ordered a trial. King Ananda's secretary, Senator Chaleo Patoomros, and the pages, But and Chit, were arrested and charged with conspiracy to murder the King.

The trial began in August 1948. Prior to the trial, Pibulsonggram admitted to US Ambassador Edwin Stanton that he was doubtful that the trial would resolve the mystery of Ananda Mahidol's death.[4] The prosecution's case was supported by 124 witnesses and such voluminous documentary evidence that the defence counsel asked for an adjournment to give them time to consider it. When this was refused the counsel resigned, and new counsel were found. Later, two of the defence counsel were arrested and charged with treason. Of the remaining two, one resigned, leaving only a single young lawyer for the defence, Fak Na Songkhla. Towards the end of the case he was joined by Chaleo Patoomros's daughter, who had just graduated.

The lengthy trial finally ended in May 1951. The court ruled that King Ananda had been assassinated, but that Chaleo had not been proved guilty and that neither of the pages could have fired the fatal shot. However, they found Chit guilty of being a party to the crime. The charges against Chaleo and But were dismissed and they were released.

Chit appealed against his conviction, and the prosecution appealed against the acquittal of Chaleo and But. After fifteen months of deliberation the Appeal Court dismissed Chit's appeal, and undeterred by the legal doctrine of double jeopardy also found But guilty.

Chit and But appealed to the Supreme Court, which deliberated for ten more months before finally upholding both convictions, and this time convicting Chaleo as well.

In February 1955, Chaleo Patoomros and both pages were executed by Pibulsonggram's government on charges of conspiracy to kill the King. His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej has since said that he does not believe they were guilty..

Alternative explanations of the death

The King's death is still seen as a mystery. The subject is never openly discussed in Thailand, though numerous books have been written about it in Thai. With the exception of Bhumibol Adulyadej, all the principals (known to be) related in any way to the death are now deceased.

Bhumibol Adulyadej

On 15 June 1946, American Chargé d'affaires Charles Yost met with Foreign Minister Direk Jayanama, who had just had an audience with the new King, Bhumibol Adulyadej. In his report to the US State Department, Yost noted

King Phumiphol... informed the Foreign Minister that he considered [the widely circulated] rumors [on the late King's death] absurd, that he knew his brother well and that he was certain that his death had been accidental... What the King said to Direk does not necessarily represent what he really believes, it is nevertheless interesting that he made so categorical a statement to the Foreign Minister.[4]

However, in an 1980 BBC documentary, Bhumibol stated that although the court ruled that the death was 'proven' not an accident, "one doesn't know." He noted in English:

The investigation provided the fact that he died with a bullet wound in his forehead. It was proved that it was not an accident and not a suicide. One doesn’t know. ... But what happened is very mysterious, because immediately much of the evidence was just shifted. And because it was political, so everyone was political, even the police were political, [it was] not very clear. I only know [that] when I arrived he was dead. Many people wanted to advance not theories but facts to clear up the affair. They were suppressed. And they were suppressed by influential people in this country and in international politics.[5]

Seni Pramoj and the Democrat Party

Seni Pramoj and the Democrat Party spread rumors that Pridi was behind the death. Yost noted in a US State Department communication:

"... Within forty-eight hours after the death of the late King, two relatives of Seni Pramoj, first his nephew and later his wife, came to the Legation and stated categorically their conviction that the King had been assassinated at the instigation of the Prime Minister (Pridi Phanomyong). It was of course clear that they had been sent by Seni. I felt it necessary to state to both of them in the strongest terms, in order to make it perfectly clear that this Legation could not be drawn into Siamese political intrigues, that I did not believe these stories and that I considered the circulation at this time of fantastic rumors un-supported by a shred of evidence to be wholly in-excusable. The British Minister informed me this morning that he had also been approached by several members of the Opposition to whom he had stated that he accepted the official account of the King's death and that he would not be drawn into any further discussion of the matter.[4]

Pridi Phanomyong

On 14 June 1946, Yost met with Pridi Phanomyong and made the following report to the US State Department:

"[Pridi spoke] very frankly about the whole situation and ascribed the King's death to an accident, but it was obvious that the possibility of suicide was at the back of his mind. [Pridi] was violently angry at the accusations of foul play leveled against himself and most bitter in the manner in which he alleged (without doubt justly) that the Royal Family and the Opposition, particularly Seni Pramoj and Phra Sudhiat, had prejudiced the King and especially the Princess Mother against him."[4]

Plaek Pibulsonggram

After overthrowing Pridi Banomyong in a coup, Field Marshal Plaek Pibulsonggram told US Ambassador Edwin Stanton that he "personally doubted whether Nai Pridi was directly involved for two reasons: firstly, ... Pridi is a very clever politician and secondly, ... he has a 'kind heart'." Pibul concluded to the Ambassador that "he did not think [Pridi] would cause anybody to be murdered. Pibul's wife, present in the meeting, seconded her husband's observations. However, Pibul noted that it was possible that Pridi had covered up or destroyed some of the evidence to protect the successor, Bhumibol Adulyadej.[4]

Keith Simpson

Dr. Keith Simpson, a forensic pathologist who investigated the King's death, found it highly unlikely that the death was due to suicide, noting that:

  • The pistol was found by the King's left hand, but he was right-handed.
  • The direction of bullet fired was not inward towards the centre of the head.
  • The wound, over the left eye, was not in one of the elective sites, nor a "contact" discharge.
  • The King was killed while lying flat on his back. Simpson noted that in twenty years' experience he had never known of any suicide shooting himself while lying flat on his back.[2]

William Stevenson

An account of the death is given in William Stevenson's The Revolutionary King, written with the co-operation of King Bhumibol Adulyadej. This account exculpates those executed and suggests that Ananda Mahidol was murdered by Tsuji Masanobu. Masanobu was a former Japanese intelligence officer who had been active in Thailand during the war and, at the time of Ananda Mahidol's death, was hiding out in Thailand for fear of being prosecuted for his war crimes.

It is clear from Stevenson's account that Ananda Mahidol could not have killed himself, either by suicide (as is sometimes suggested) or by accident. He was found lying on his back in his bed, not wearing his glasses, without which he was almost blind. He had a small bullet wound in his forehead and a somewhat larger exit wound in the back of his head. His pistol, a Colt .45 given him by a former US Army officer, was not nearby. The M1911 Colt is not especially prone to accidental discharge; it will fire only if considerable pressure is applied to the safety plate at the back of the butt at the same time as the trigger is depressed. It is a heavy pistol and awkward to use by an untrained person. It would have been almost impossible for Ananda Mahidol, a frail 20-year-old, to lie on his back and shoot himself in the forehead with such a weapon. Had he done so, the impact, according to forensics experts, would have blown his skull apart, not caused the small wounds seen by many witnesses. Stevenson writes that no cartridge case was found, and subsequent inquiries ordered by King Bhumibol, but suppressed by later governments, found that the Colt had not been fired.[6]

Rayne Kruger

Another account, which concluded that Ananda Mahidol's death was the result of suicide, was explored by journalist Rayne Kruger in his book, The Devil's Discus.[7] The book is banned in Thailand. However, a website[8] by a Thai writer has provided a summary of Kruger's arguments, and it links to other material about the death. Kruger, who had unprecedented access to members of the inner circle of the Thai royal family (although these contacts had to remain unidentified), drew the conclusion that Ananda's death was most probably an 'accidental suicide'. Thus, said Kruger, it appears the sad, most likely accidental, death of the young king was exploited for the purposes of a political vendetta, and that three innocent victims were executed to maintain the façade.

Paul Handley

Paul Handley, author of a controversial biography of King Bhumibol Adulyadej, feels that either suicide or an accidental shooting by Prince Bhumibol was responsible for the King's death:[9] "I have no idea whether Ananda shot himself or was killed by Bhumibol, the two possibilities most accepted among historians. If the latter, I clearly term it an accident that occurred in play".[10]

Tributes to King Ananda

Titles and styles

Styles of
King Ananda Mahidol
Rama VIII of Thailand
Reference style His Royal Majesty
Spoken style Your Royal Majesty
Alternative style Sir
  • September 20, 1925 – November 7, 1927: His Serene Highness Prince Ananda Mahidol
  • November 8, 1927 – December 25, 1935: His Highness Prince Ananda Mahidol
  • March 2, 1935 – June 9, 1946: His Majesty King Ananda Mahidol


See also


  1. ^ "Banknotes, Series 15". Banknotes > History and Series of Banknotes >.  
  2. ^ a b Keith Simpson. Forty Years of Murder: an Autobiography at the Wayback Machine (archived February 22, 2006), Chapter 13: The Violent Death of King Ananda of Siam, Harrap, 1978.
  3. ^ Hua Hin Tourist Information, Biography of King Ananda Mahidol
  4. ^ a b c d e f Sulak Sivaraksa, "Powers That Be: Pridi Banomyong through the rise and fall of Thai democracy", 1999.
  5. ^ BBC, "Soul of a Nation", originally broadcast 1980; rebroadcast as part of Gero von Boehm, "Paläste der Macht—Herrscher des Orients: Der Sultan von Brunei und das thailändische Königshaus.", broadcast on Channel "Arte", broadcast 14 May 2008, 20.15 hrs
  6. ^ William Stevenson, The Revolutionary King: the true-life sequel to the King and I, 2001, Constable and Robinson, ISBN 1-84119-451-4.
  7. ^ Kruger, Rayne (1964).  
  8. ^ "The Devil's Discus flies away, page 156". Archived from the original on 25 October 2009. 
  9. ^ Handley, Paul M. (2006). The King Never Smiles. Yale University Press, pp. 77–78. ISBN 0-300-10682-3.
  10. ^ "Nuanced Views of the King", Far Eastern Economic Review, November 2006.

External links

  • Bowring, Philip (10 February 2005). "Books : The Revolutionary King". International Herald Tribune. 
  • "Biography of King Ananda Mahidol". Hua Hin Tourist Information. Archived from the original on 7 December 2005. Retrieved 15 December 2005. 
  • Simpson, Keith (1978). Forty Years of Murder: an Autobiography. Harrap. Chapter 13: The Violent Death of King Ananda of Siam. Archived from the original on 22 February 2006. Retrieved 26 March 2008. 
Ananda Mahidol
Born: 20 September 1925 Died: 9 June 1946
Regnal titles
Preceded by
King of Siam
Country name changed to "Thailand"
New title
Siam became "Thailand"
King of Thailand
Succeeded by
Bhumibol Adulyadej
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.