World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Anne Hutchinson

Article Id: WHEBN0000318482
Reproduction Date:

Title: Anne Hutchinson  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Mary Dyer, Susanna Cole, John Wheelwright, John Cotton (minister), Did you know nominations/John Cotton (Puritan)
Collection: 1591 Births, 1643 Deaths, 17Th-Century Women, American Calvinist and Reformed Theologians, American Colonial Women, American Midwives, American Political Philosophy, American Puritans, Anglican Saints, Colonial American Women, History of New York City, History of the Bronx, New England Puritanism, People Excommunicated by Christian Churches, People from Alford, Lincolnshire, People from Boston, Massachusetts, People from Colonial Boston, Massachusetts, People from the Bronx, People of Colonial Massachusetts, People of Colonial New York, People of Colonial Rhode Island, People of New Netherland
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Anne Hutchinson

Anne Hutchinson
A woman standing before a table behind which are seated several men, with several other men occupying seats against the walls of the room
Anne Hutchinson on Trial by Edwin Austin Abbey
Born Anne Marbury
Baptised 20 July 1591
Alford, Lincolnshire, England
Died August 1643 (aged 52)
New Netherland (later The Bronx, New York)
Education Home schooled and self-taught
Occupation Midwife
Known for Role in the Antinomian Controversy
Religion Puritan
Spouse(s) William Hutchinson
Children Edward, Susanna, Richard, Faith, Bridget, Francis, Elizabeth, William, Samuel, Anne, Mary, Katherine, William, Susanna, Zuriel
Parent(s) Francis Marbury and Bridget Dryden
Relatives Grandmother of Governor Peleg Sanford
Great great grandmother of Governor Thomas Hutchinson
Ancestor of U.S. Presidents George W. Bush

Anne Hutchinson, born Anne Marbury (1591–1643), was a Puritan spiritual adviser, mother of 15, and an important participant in the Antinomian Controversy that shook the infant Massachusetts Bay Colony from 1636 to 1638. Her strong religious convictions were at odds with the established Puritan clergy in the Boston area, and her popularity and charisma helped create a theological schism that threatened to destroy the Puritans' religious experiment in New England. She was eventually tried and convicted, then banished from the colony with many of her supporters.

Born in Alford, Lincolnshire, England, Anne was the daughter of Francis Marbury, an Anglican cleric and school teacher who gave her a far better education than most other girls received. She lived in London as a young adult, and married there an old friend from home, William Hutchinson. The couple moved back to Alford, where they began following the dynamic preacher named John Cotton in the nearby major port of Boston, Lincolnshire. After Cotton was compelled to emigrate in 1633, the Hutchinsons followed a year later with their 11 children, and soon became well established in the growing settlement of Boston in New England. Anne was a midwife, and very helpful to those needing her assistance, as well as forthcoming with her personal religious understandings. Soon she was hosting women at her house weekly, providing commentary on recent sermons. These meetings became so popular that she began offering meetings for men as well, including the young governor of the colony, Henry Vane.

As a follower of Cotton, she espoused a "covenant of grace," while accusing all of the local ministers (except for Cotton and her husband's brother-in-law, John Wheelwright) of preaching a "covenant of works." Following complaints of many ministers about the opinions coming from Hutchinson and her allies, the situation erupted into what is commonly called the Antinomian Controversy, resulting in her 1637 trial, conviction, and banishment from the colony. This was followed by a March 1638 church trial in which she was excommunicated. With encouragement from Providence founder Roger Williams, Hutchinson and many of her supporters established the settlement of Portsmouth in what became the Colony of Rhode Island and Providence Plantations. After her husband's death a few years later, threats of Massachusetts taking over Rhode Island compelled Hutchinson to move totally outside the reach of Boston, into the lands of the Dutch. While five of her older surviving children remained in New England or in England, she settled with her younger children near an ancient landmark called Split Rock in what later became The Bronx in New York City. Tensions with the native Siwanoy were high at the time. In August 1643, during Kieft's War, Hutchinson, six of her children, and other household members were massacred during an attack. The only survivor was her nine-year-old daughter, Susanna, who was taken captive.

Hutchinson is a key figure in the development of religious freedom in England's American colonies and the history of women in ministry. She challenged the authority of the ministers, exposing the subordination of women in the culture of colonial Massachusetts. She is honoured by Massachusetts with a State House monument calling her a "courageous exponent of civil liberty and religious toleration." She has been called the most famous, or infamous, English woman in colonial American history.


  • Life in England 1
    • Childhood 1.1
    • Adulthood—following John Cotton 1.2
  • Boston 2
    • Boston Church 2.1
    • Home Bible study group 2.2
    • Antinomian controversy 2.3
      • Events of 1637 2.3.1
      • Civil trial 2.3.2
      • Detention 2.3.3
      • Church trial 2.3.4
  • Rhode Island 3
    • Final pregnancy 3.1
    • Dissension in government 3.2
  • New Netherland 4
    • Massacre 4.1
  • Historical impact 5
    • The role of gender 5.1
    • Heretic label 5.2
    • Church and secular politics 5.3
    • Modern view 5.4
  • Memorials and legacy 6
    • Literary works 6.1
    • Namesakes 6.2
    • Pardon 6.3
  • Family 7
    • Immediate family 7.1
    • Descendants 7.2
    • Ancestry 7.3
  • See also 8
  • References 9
    • Bibliography 9.1
  • Further reading 10
  • External links 11

Life in England


A three-story building with three men standing in front having a conversation, and one or more other people near the building.
Marshalsea Prison, London, where Hutchinson's father was detained for two years for "heresy"

Anne Hutchinson was born Anne Marbury in Alford, Lincolnshire, England, and baptised there on 20 July 1591, the daughter of Francis Marbury and Bridget Dryden.[1][2] Her father was an Anglican cleric in London, with strong Puritan leanings, who felt strongly that clergy should be well educated and clashed with his superiors on this issue.[2] Marbury's repeated challenges to the Anglican authorities led to his censure and imprisonment several years before Anne was born; in 1578 he was given a public trial, of which, during a period of house arrest, he made a transcript from memory.[3] He later used this transcript to educate and amuse his children, he being the hero, and the Bishop of London being portrayed as a buffoon.[3] For his conviction of heresy, Marbury spent two years in Marshalsea Prison, on the south side of the River Thames, across from London.[4] In 1580, at the age of 25, he was released and was considered sufficiently reformed to preach and teach. He moved to the remote market town of Alford in Lincolnshire, about 140 miles (230 km) north of London.[5]

Anne's father was soon appointed curate (deputy vicar) of Saint Wilfrid's, the local church in Alford, and in 1585 he also became the schoolmaster at the Alford Free Grammar School, one of many such public schools, free to the poor, begun by Queen Elizabeth.[6] About this time Marbury married his first wife, Elizabeth Moore, who bore three children, then died.[7] Within a year of his first wife's death, Marbury married Bridget Dryden, about ten years younger than he, from a prominent Northampton family.[7] Dryden's brother, Erasmus, was the grandfather of the famous playwright and Poet Laureate, John Dryden.[8] Anne was the third of 15 children born to this marriage, 12 of whom survived early childhood.[9] The Marburys lived in Alford for the first 15 years of Anne's life, and with her father's strong commitment to learning, she received a better education than most contemporary girls, and also became intimately familiar with scripture and Christian tenets.[2] While education at that time was almost exclusively offered to boys and men, one reason that Marbury may have taught his daughters is that six of his first seven children were girls; another reason may have been that the ruling class in Elizabethan England began realising that girls could be schooled, looking to the example of the queen, who spoke six foreign languages.[10]

In 1605, when Anne was 14, the family moved from Alford to the heart of London, where her father was given the position of vicar of the Church of Saint Martin's in the Vintry.[11] Here his expression of puritan views, though somewhat muffled, was tolerated, because of a shortage of pastors.[11][12] Marbury took on additional work in 1608, preaching in the parish of Saint Pancras, several miles northwest of the city, travelling there by horseback twice a week.[13] In 1610 he replaced that position with one much closer to home, and became rector of Saint Margaret's, on New Fish Street, only a short walk from Saint Martin in the Vintry.[13] He was at a high point in his career, but in February 1611, when Anne was 19 years old, he died suddenly at the age of 55.[13]

Adulthood—following John Cotton

The year after her father's death, Anne Marbury, aged 21, married William Hutchinson, a familiar acquaintance from Alford, who was a fabric merchant then working in London.[14] The couple was married at St Mary Woolnoth Church in London on 9 August 1612, shortly after which they moved back to their hometown of Alford.[1][14]

Soon they heard about an engaging minister, John Cotton, who preached at Saints Botolph's Church in the large port of Boston, about 21 miles (34 km) from Alford.[14] Cotton was installed as minister at Boston the year the Hutchinsons were married, after having been a tutor at Emmanuel College in Cambridge.[15] Though only 27 years old, he had gained a reputation as one of the leading Puritans in England.[15] Once the Hutchinsons heard Cotton preach, the couple made the trip to Boston as often as possible, enduring the ride by horseback when the weather and circumstances allowed.[14] Cotton's spiritual message was different from that of his fellow Puritans, as he placed less emphasis on one's behavior to attain God's salvation and more emphasis on the moment of religious conversion "in which mortal man was infused with a divine grace."[12] Anne Hutchinson was greatly attracted to Cotton's theology of "absolute grace", which caused her to question the value of "works", and to view the Holy Spirit as "indwelling in the elect saint".[16][17] This allowed her to identify as a "mystic participant in the transcendent power of the Almighty"; such a theology was empowering to women, whose status was otherwise determined by their husbands or fathers.[18]

A painting of a man with long curly hair and a slight smile, wearing the bib of a colonial-era minister.
Reverend John Cotton was Hutchinson's mentor, and her reason for immigrating to New England.

Another strong influence on Hutchinson was closer to her home. In the nearby town of Bilsby, her husband's brother-in-law, the young minister John Wheelwright, preached a message like that of Cotton.[12] As reformers, both Cotton and Wheelwright encouraged a sense of religious rebirth among their parishioners, but their weekly sermons did not satisfy the yearnings of some Puritan worshippers. This led to the rise of conventicles, which were gatherings of "those who had found grace" to listen to sermon repetitions, discuss and debate scripture, and pray.[19] These gatherings were particularly important to women because they allowed women to take on roles of religious leadership that were otherwise denied them in a male-dominated church hierarchy.[19] Inspired by Cotton and by other women who ran conventicles, Hutchinson began holding meetings in her own home, where she reviewed recent sermons with her listeners, and provided her own explanations of the message.[20]

The Puritans wanted to do away with the ceremony of the Church of England and govern their churches based on a consensus of the parishioners. They preferred to eliminate bishops appointed by the monarchs, choose their own church elders (or governors), and provide for a lay leader and two ministers—one a teacher in charge of doctrine, and the other a pastor in charge of people's souls.[21] By 1633, Cotton's inclination toward such Puritan practices had attracted the attention of Archbishop William Laud, who was on a campaign to suppress any preaching and practices that did not conform to the practices of the established Anglican Church.[22] In that year, Cotton was removed from his ministry, and he went into hiding.[22] Threatened with imprisonment, he made a hasty departure for New England aboard the ship Griffin, taking his pregnant wife. She gave birth to her child during the voyage to the colonies. (They named the child Seaborn).[23]

When Cotton left England, Anne Hutchinson described it as a "great trouble unto her," and said that she "could not be at rest" until she followed her minister to New England.[15] Hutchinson believed that the Spirit instructed her to follow Cotton to America, "impressed by the evidence of divine providence".[19] As she was well into her 14th pregnancy, she did not travel until after the baby was born.[22] With the intention of soon going to New England, the Hutchinsons allowed their oldest son, Edward, to sail with Cotton before the remainder of the family made the voyage.[24] In 1634, 43-year-old Anne Hutchinson, her 48-year-old husband William, and their other ten surviving children, aged about eight months to 19 years, set sail from England aboard the Griffin, the same ship that had carried Cotton and their oldest son a year earlier.[24]


Highly successful in his mercantile business, Will Hutchinson brought a considerable estate with him to New England.[25] After arriving in Boston in the late summer of 1634, the Hutchinson family purchased a half-acre lot on the Shawmut Peninsula, now downtown Boston.[26] Here they had a house built, one of the largest on the peninsula, with a timber frame and at least two stories.[26] (The house stood until October 1711, when it was consumed in the great fire of Boston, after which the Old Corner Bookstore was built on the site.)[27] The Hutchinsons soon were granted Taylor's Island in the Boston harbour, where they grazed their sheep, and also acquired 600 acres of land at Mount Wollaston, 10 miles (16 km) south of Boston in the area that later became Quincy.[28] Once established, William Hutchinson continued to prosper in the cloth trade, and made land purchases and investments. He became a town selectman and deputy to the General Court.[19] Anne Hutchinson likewise fit into her new home with ease, devoting many hours to those who were ill or in need.[29] She became an active midwife, and while tending to women in childbirth, she provided them with spiritual advice.[30] the Magistrate John Winthrop noted that "her ordinary talke was about the things of the Kingdome of God," and "her usuall conversation was in the way of righteousness and kindnesse."[30]

Boston Church

The Hutchinsons became members of the Boston church, the most important church in the colony.[31] With its location and harbour, Boston was New England's centre of commerce, and its church was characterised by Winthrop as "the most publick, where Seamen and all Strangers came."[31] The church membership had grown from 80 to 120 during Cotton's first four months there. In his journal, Winthrop proclaimed, "more were converted & added to that Churche, than to all the other Churches in the Baye." The historian Michael Winship noted in 2005 that the church seemed to approach the Puritan ideal of a Christian community.[31] The early Massachusetts historian William Hubbard found the church to be "in so flourishing a condition as were scarce any where else to be paralleled." Winship considers it an exceptional twist of fate that the colony's most important church also had the most unconventional minister in John Cotton.[32] Because of Cotton's divergence from the theology of his fellow ministers, the more extreme religious views of Hutchinson and Henry Vane, the colony's young governor, did not much stand out.[32]

Home Bible study group

Hutchinson's visits to women in childbirth led to discussions along the lines of the conventicles in England. She soon began hosting weekly meetings at her home for women who wanted to discuss Cotton's sermons, and hear her explanations and elaborations.[29] Her meetings for women became so popular that she had to organise meetings for men as well, and she was hosting 60 or more people per week.[15] These gatherings brought women, as well as their husbands, "to enquire more seriously after the Lord Jesus Christ."[33]

As the meetings continued, Hutchinson began offering her own religious views, stressing that only "an intuition of the Spirit" would lead to one's election by God, and not good works.[29] As her theological interpretations began diverging from the more legalistic views found among the colony's ministers, the attendance at her meetings increased, and soon included Governor Vane.[29] Her ideas that one's outward behaviour was not necessarily tied to the state of one's soul became attractive to those who might have been more attached to their professions than to their religious state, such as merchants and craftsmen.[29] As the colony's ministers became more aware of Hutchinson's meetings, they contended that such "unauthorised" religious gatherings might confuse the faithful. Hutchinson responded to this with a verse from Titus, saying that "the elder women should instruct the younger."[34]

Antinomian controversy

Besides Hutchinson's gatherings being seen as unorthodox by some of the colony's ministers, differing religious opinions within the colony eventually became public debates. The resulting religious tension erupted into what has traditionally been called the Antinomian Controversy, but has more recently been labelled the Free Grace Controversy.

A painting of a man with a white moustache and small beard.  He is wearing a skull cap and the bib of a colonial-era minister.
Reverend John Wheelwright was an ally of Hutchinson during the Antinomian Controversy, and both were banished.

In September 1634, the Reverend Zachariah Symmes, who sailed to New England on the same ship as the Hutchinsons, told another minister that he doubted Anne Hutchinson's orthodoxy, based on questions that she asked him following his ship-board sermons.[35] This issue delayed Hutchinson's membership to the Boston church by a week, until a pastoral examination determined that she was sufficiently orthodox to join the church.[36] In 1635 a difficult situation occurred when the senior pastor of the church, John Wilson, returned from a lengthy trip to England where he had been settling his affairs. Exposed to his teaching for the first time, Hutchinson immediately saw a big difference between her own doctrines and his.[37] She found his emphasis on morality, and his doctrine of "evidencing justification by sanctification" to be disagreeable. She told her followers that Wilson lacked "the seal of the Spirit."[37] Wilson's theological views were in accord with those of all of the other ministers in the colony except for Cotton, who stressed "the inevitability of God's will" ("free grace") as opposed to preparation (works).[38] Hutchinson and her allies had become accustomed to Cotton's doctrines, and they began disrupting Wilson's sermons, even finding excuses to leave when Wilson got up to preach or pray.[39]

As early as the spring of 1636, Thomas Shepard, the minister of Newtown (which later became Cambridge), began writing letters to Cotton.[40] He expressed concern about Cotton's preaching, and about some of the unorthodox opinions found among his Boston parishioners. Shepard's "heresy hunting" went even further when he began criticising the Boston opinions to his Newtown congregation during his sermons.[40] In May 1636 the Bostonians received a new ally when the Reverend John Wheelwright arrived from England, and immediately aligned himself with Cotton, Hutchinson and other "free grace" advocates. Wheelwright had not only been a close neighbour of the Hutchinsons in Lincolnshire, but his wife was a sister of Hutchinson's husband.[41] Another boost for the free grace advocates came during the same month, when the young aristocrat Henry Vane was elected as the governor of the colony. Vane was a strong supporter of Hutchinson, but also had his own ideas about theology that were considered not only unorthodox, but radical by some.[42]

Hutchinson and the other free grace advocates continued to question the orthodox ministers in the colony. When Wheelwright began preaching at Mount Wollaston, about ten miles south of the Boston meetinghouse, his sermons began to answer Shepard's criticisms with his own criticism of the covenant of works. This mounting "pulpit aggression," along with the lack of respect shown Boston's Reverend Wilson, continued throughout the summer. Wilson endured these religious differences for several months before deciding that the affronts and errors were serious enough to require a response.[32] He is the one who likely alerted the magistrate John Winthrop, one of his parishioners, to take notice. On or shortly after 21 October 1636, Winthrop gave the first public warning of the problem that would consume him and the leadership of the Massachusetts Bay Colony for much of the next two years.[43] In his journal he wrote, "One Mrs. Hutchinson, a member of the church at Boston, a woman of a ready wit and a bold spirit, brought over with her two dangerous errors: 1. That the person of the Holy Ghost dwells in a justified person. 2. That no sanctification can help to evidence to us our justification."[44] He went on to elaborate these two points, and with this journal entry, the Antinomian Controversy began.[44]

On 25 October 1636, seven ministers gathered at the home of Cotton to confront the developing discord; they held a "private conference" which included Hutchinson and other lay leaders from the Boston church.[35][45] Some agreement was reached, and Cotton "gave satisfaction to them [the other ministers], so as he agreed with them all in the point of sanctification, and so did Mr. Wheelwright; so as they all did hold, that sanctification did help to evidence justification."[35] Another issue was that some of the ministers had heard that Hutchinson had, during her conventicles, criticised them for preaching a covenant of works and said that they were not able ministers of the New Testament. Hutchinson responded to this only when prompted, and only to one or two ministers at a time. She believed that her response, which was largely coaxed from her, was private and confidential.[46] A year later her words would be used against her in a trial that would result in her banishment from the colony.[47]

A painting of a man with a virile face and long dark hair; he is wearing a dark red robe-like outfit, and his demeanour conveys elegance and importance.
Governor Henry Vane strongly supported Hutchinson during the colony's difficulties.

By late 1636, as the controversy deepened, Hutchinson and her supporters were accused of two heresies in the Puritan church: antinomianism and familism. The word "antinomianism" literally means "against or opposed to the law"; in a theological context it means "the moral law is not binding upon Christians, who are under the law of grace."[48] Technically, if one was under the law of grace then moral law did not apply, allowing one to engage in immoral acts.[29] Familism, named for a 16th-century sect called the Family of Love, involved one's perfect union with God under the Holy Spirit, coupled with freedom both from sin, and from the responsibility for it.[49] While Hutchinson and her supporters were sometimes accused of engaging in immoral behaviour or "free love" to discredit them, such acts were antithetical to their doctrine.[29][48] Hutchinson, Wheelwright and Vane all took leading roles as antagonists of the orthodox party, but theologically, it was Cotton's differences of opinion with the colony's other ministers that was at the centre of the controversy.[50]

By winter the theological schism had become great enough that the General Court called for a day of fasting to help ease the colony's difficulties. During the appointed fast-day on Thursday, 19 January 1637, Wheelwright preached at the Boston church in the afternoon. To the Puritan clergy, his sermon was "censurable and incited mischief."[51] Though the colony's ministers were offended by the sermon, the free grace advocates were encouraged, and they became more vociferous in their opposition to the "legal" ministers. Not only did Governor Vane begin challenging the doctrines of the colony's divines, but supporters of Hutchinson refused to serve during the Pequot War of 1637 because Wilson was the chaplain of the expedition.[39][52] Ministers worried that the bold stand of Hutchinson and her supporters began to threaten the "Puritan's holy experiment."[39] Had they succeeded, the historian Dunn believes they would have profoundly changed the thrust of Massachusetts history.[53]

Events of 1637

By March, the political tide began to turn against the free grace advocates. Wheelwright was tried for contempt and sedition that month for his fast-day sermon, and in a close vote he was convicted, but not yet sentenced. During the election of May 1637, Henry Vane was replaced as governor by John Winthrop; in addition, all the other Boston magistrates who supported Hutchinson and Wheelwright were voted out of office. By the summer of 1637, Vane sailed back to England, never to return. With his departure, the time was ripe for the orthodox party to deal with the remainder of their rivals.[54]

At the autumn court in 1637, which convened on 2 November, they sentenced Wheelwright to banishment, ordering him to leave the colony within 14 days. Several of the other supporters of Hutchinson and Wheelwright were tried and given varied sentences. Following these preliminaries, it was Anne Hutchinson's turn to be tried.[55]

Civil trial

With Wheelwright banished and other court business taken care of, on 7 November 1637 Hutchinson was brought to trial, presided over by Governor John Winthrop, on the charge of "traducing [slandering] the ministers". Other charges against her were laid out by Winthrop, including being one who "troubled the peace of the commonwealth and churches", promoting and divulging opinions that had caused recent troubles, and continuing to hold meetings at her home despite a recent synod that had condemned them.[56] They found it difficult to charge her because, unlike Wheelwright and the other men who had been tried, she had never spoken her opinions in public, nor had she ever signed any statements about them. Winthrop's first two lines of prosecutorial attack were to portray her as a co-conspirator of others who had openly caused trouble in the colony, and then to fault her for holding conventicles. Question by question, Hutchinson effectively stonewalled him in her responses.[57] The floundering Winthrop was unable to find a way to convert Hutchinson's known membership in a seditious faction into a convictable offence. The deputy governor, Thomas Dudley, with a substantial background in law, stepped in to assist the prosecution. Dudley essentially harangued Hutchinson about her conventicles and her association with the other conspirators. With no answer by Hutchinson, he moved on to the charge of her slandering the ministers.[58]

A painting of a man with a stern expression on his face, wearing very dark clothing so that his pale hands show boldly.  His hands are placed in front of him, separately, one above the other.
John Winthrop presided over Hutchinson's trial in 1637 as both accuser and judge.

The remainder of the trial was spent on this last charge. The prosecution intended to demonstrate that Hutchinson had made disparaging remarks about the colony's ministers, and to use the October meeting as their evidence.[58] Six ministers had presented their written versions of the October conference to the court, and Hutchinson agreed with the substance of their statements. Her defence was that she had spoken reluctantly and in private, and that in the ministerial context of the meeting, she said she "must either speak false or true in my answers".[58] In those private meetings, she had cited Proverbs 29:25, "The fear of man bringeth a snare: but whoso putteth his trust in the Lord shall be safe."[58] The court was not interested in her distinction between public and private statements.[59]

At the end of the first day of the trial, Winthrop recorded, "Mrs. Hutchinson, the court you see hath labored to bring you to acknowledge the error of your way that so you might be reduced. The time now grows late. We shall therefore give you a little more time to consider of it and therefore desire that you attend the court again in the morning."[60] The first day had gone fairly well for Hutchinson, who had outfenced the magistrates in a battle of wits.[60] The biographer Eve LaPlante noted, "Her success before the court may have astonished her judges, but it was no surprise to her. She was confident of herself and her intellectual tools, largely because of the intimacy she felt with God."[61]

During the morning of the second day of the trial, it appeared that Hutchinson had been given some legal counsel the previous evening, and she had more to say. She continued to criticise the ministers of violating their mandate of confidentiality. She said they had deceived the court by not telling about her reluctance to share her thoughts with them. She insisted that the ministers testify under oath, which they were very hesitant to do.[59] The magistrate Simon Bradstreet said that "she would make the ministers sin if they said something mistaken under oath", but she answered that if they were going to accuse her, that "I desire it may be upon oath."[62] As a matter of due process, the ministers would have to be sworn in, but would agree to do so only if the defence witnesses spoke first.

There were three such witnesses, all from the Boston church: deacon John Coggeshall, lay leader Thomas Leverett, and minister John Cotton.[63] The first two witnesses made brief statements that had little effect on the court, but Cotton was grilled extensively. When Cotton testified, he tended to not remember many events of the October meeting, and attempted to soften the meaning of statements that Hutchinson was being accused of. He stressed that the ministers were not as upset about any Hutchinson remarks at the end of the October meeting as they appeared to be later.[64] When Dudley reiterated that Hutchinson had told the ministers that they were not able ministers of the New Testament, Cotton replied that he did not remember her saying that.[64]

More parrying between Cotton and the court, but the exchanges were not picked up in the transcript of the proceedings. Wherever the proceedings were headed, Hutchinson took the load off the consciences of her accusers. She asked the court for leave to "give you the ground of what I know to be true."[65] She then addressed the court with her own judgment:

This was the "dramatic high point of the most analyzed event of the free grace controversy", wrote historian Michael Winship.[63] Historians have given a variety of reasons for this seemingly impulsive statement, including an "exultant impulse", "hysteria", "cracking under the strain of the inquest", and being "possessed of the Spirit".[67] Winship, citing the work of the historian Mary Beth Norton, suggested that Hutchinson consciously decided to explain why she knew that the divines of the colony were not able ministers of the New Testament. This was "not histrionics, but pedagogy"; it was Hutchinson's attempt to teach the Court, and doing so was consistent with her character.[67]

Hutchinson simplified the task of her opponents, whose prosecution had been somewhat shaky.[68] Her revelation was considered not only seditious, but also in contempt of court. Cotton, pressed by Dudley on whether or not he supported Hutchinson's revelation, said he could find theological justification for it. Cotton may have still been angry over the zeal with which some opponents had come after the dissidents within his congregation.[69] Winthrop was not interested in this quibbling, though; he was using Hutchinson's bold assertions to lead the court in the direction of rewriting history. Many of the Puritans had been convinced that there was a single destructive prophetic figure behind all of the difficulties that the colony had been having, and Hutchinson had just become the culprit.[70] Winthrop addressed the court, "if therefore it be the mind of the court, looking at [her] as the principal cause of all our trouble, that they would now consider what is to be done with her."[71]

The Bostonians made a final effort to slow the proceedings. William Coddington rose, asserting, "I do not see any clear witness against her, and you know it is a rule of the court that no man may be a judge and an accuser too ...," ending with, "Here is no law of God that she hath broken nor any law of the country that she hath broke, and therefore deserve no censure."[72] The court wanted a sentence, but could not proceed until some of the ministers spoke. Three of the ministers were sworn in, and each testified against Hutchinson. Winthrop moved to have her banished; in the ensuing tally, only the Boston deputies voted against conviction.[73] Hutchinson challenged the sentence's legitimacy, saying, "I desire to know wherefore I am banished." Winthrop responded, "The court knows wherefore and is satisfied."[74]

Hutchinson was called a heretic and an instrument of the devil, and was condemned to banishment by the Court "as being a woman not fit for our society".[75] The Puritans sincerely believed that in banishing Hutchinson, they were protecting God's eternal truth.[76] Winthrop summed up the case with genuine feeling:

"Thus it pleased the Lord to heare the prayers of his afflicted people ... and by the care and indevour of the wise and faithfull ministers of the Churches, assisted by the Civill authority, to discover this Master-piece of the old Serpent ..." and he ended by noting, "It is the Lords work, and it is marvellous in our eyes."[76]


Following her civil trial, Hutchinson was put under house arrest and ordered to be gone by the end of the following March. In the interim, she was not allowed to return home, but was detained at the house of Joseph Weld, brother of the Reverend Thomas Weld, located in Roxbury, about two miles from her home in Boston.[77] While the distance was not great, Hutchinson was rarely able to see her children because of the weather, which was particularly harsh that winter.[78] Winthrop, who referred to Hutchinson as "the prisoner", was determined to keep her isolated so that others would not be inspired by her.[78] She was frequently visited by various ministers, whose intent was to reform her thinking, but also to collect evidence against her.[78] Thomas Shepard, who was there to "collect errors", concluded that she was a dangerous woman.[79] Shepard and the other ministers who visited her drew up a list of her theological errors and presented them to the Boston church, which decided that she should stand trial for these views.[80]

Church trial

Following a four-month detention, Hutchinson, weary and in poor health, was called to trial on Thursday, 15 March 1638. The trial took place at her home church in Boston, though many of her supporters were gone. Her husband and other friends had already left the colony to prepare for a new place to live. Her only family members present were her oldest son Edward and his wife, her daughter Faith and son-in-law Thomas Savage, and her sister Katharine with her husband Richard Scott.[81]

Sketch of a man with long flowing hair who is wearing the bib of a colonial-era minister.
Reverend John Wilson, who had been ridiculed by Hutchinson, made the final pronouncement of excommunication during her church trial.

The ministers intended to protect their orthodox doctrine, and to examine Hutchinson's theological errors.[81] The ruling elder, Thomas Leverett, was charged with managing the examination. He called Mrs. Hutchinson and read the numerous errors with which she had been charged. A nine-hour interrogation followed, in which the ministers delved into some weighty points of theology.[82] At the end of the session, where only four of the many errors were covered, Cotton was put in the uncomfortable position of delivering the admonition to his admirer. He spoke, "I would speake it to Gods Glory [that] you have bine an Instrument of doing some good amongst us ... he hath given you a sharp apprehension, a ready utterance and abilitie to exprese yourselfe in the Cause of God."[83] The ministers overwhelmingly concluded that Hutchinson's unsound beliefs outweighed all the good she had done, and that she endangered the spiritual welfare of the community.[83] Cotton continued,

"You cannot Evade the Argument ... that filthie Sinne of the Communitie of Woemen; and all promiscuous and filthie cominge togeather of men and Woemen without Distinction or Relation of Mariage, will necessarily follow ... Though I have not herd, nayther do I thinke you have bine unfaythfull to your Husband in his Marriage Covenant, yet that will follow upon it."[83]
Here Cotton was making a link between Hutchinson's theological ideas and the more extreme behaviour credited to the antinomians and familists.[84] He concluded,
"Therefor, I doe Admonish you, and alsoe charge you in the name of Ch[rist] Je[sus], in whose place I stand ... that you would sadly consider the just hand of God agaynst you, the great hurt you have done to the Churches, the great Dishonour you have brought to Je[sus] Ch[rist], and the Evell that you have done to many a poore soule."[85]
With this, Hutchinson was instructed to return on the next lecture day, in one week.[85]

Cotton had not yet given up on his parishioner. With the permission of the court, Hutchinson was allowed to spend the week at his home, where the recently arrived Reverend John Davenport was also staying. All week the two ministers worked with her, and under their supervision, she had written out a formal recantation of her unsound opinions that had formerly brought objection.[86] At the next meeting, on Thursday, 22 March, Hutchinson stood, and in a subdued voice read her recantation to the congregation. She admitted to having been wrong about the soul and spirit, wrong about the resurrection of the body, wrong in prophesying the destruction of the colony, wrong about her demeanour toward the ministers, and, most remarkably, agreed that sanctification could evidence justification (a covenant of works) "as it flowes from Christ and is witnessed to us by the Spirit".[87] Had the trial ended there, she would have likely remained in good standing with the Boston church, and had the possibility of returning some day.[88]

For some of the ministers, though, it was not sufficient for this proud, strong-minded woman to submit to the humiliation of making a public confession.[86] Wilson had to explore an accusation made by Shepard at the end of the previous meeting, and new words brought on new assaults. While the outcome of her trial was uncertain following the first day's grilling, her downfall came when she would not acknowledge that she held certain theological errors before her four-month imprisonment.[88] With this, she was accused of lying, but even at this point, Winthrop and a few of the ministers wanted her soul redeemed because of her significant evangelical work before she "set forth her owne stuffe".[89] To these sentiments, Shepard vehemently argued that Hutchinson was a "Notorious Imposter" in whose heart there was never any grace. He admonished the "heinousness of her lying" during a time of supposed humiliation.[90] Shepard had swayed the proceedings, and with Cotton signalling that he had given up on her, followed by an appropriate pause, her sentence was presented by Wilson:

"Forasmuch as you, Mrs. Hutchinson, have highly transgressed and offended ... and troubled the Church with your Errors and have drawen away many a poor soule, and have upheld your Revelations; and forasmuch as you have made a Lye ... Therefor in the name of our Lord Je[sus] Ch[rist] ... I doe cast you out and ... deliver you up to Sathan ... and account you from this time forth to be a Hethen and a Publican ... I command you in the name of Ch[rist] Je[sus] and of this Church as a Leper to withdraw your selfe out of the Congregation." [91]

Hutchinson was now not only banished from the colony, but excommunicated from the church, and her leading supporters, including Coddington and Coggeshall, had been given three months to leave the colony, while others were disenfranchised or dismissed from their churches.[72] The court had ordered in November that 58 citizens of Boston and 17 from adjacent towns be disarmed unless they repudiated the "seditious label" given them, and many of these people followed Hutchinson into exile.[92]

Rhode Island

During Hutchinson's imprisonment, several of her supporters prepared to leave the colony and settle elsewhere. One such group of men, including her husband Will, met on 7 March 1638, at the home of the wealthy Boston merchant William Coddington. Ultimately 23 men signed what is known as the Portsmouth Compact, forming themselves into a "Bodie Politick" and electing Coddington as their governor, but giving him the Biblical title of "judge". Of the signers, 19 of them initially planned to move to New Jersey or Long Island, but Roger Williams convinced them to settle in the area of his Providence Plantations settlement. Coddington purchased Aquidneck Island (later named Rhode Island), in the Narragansett Bay, from the Narragansetts and the settlement of Pocasset (soon renamed Portsmouth) was founded. Anne Hutchinson followed in April, after the conclusion of her church trial.[93]

Hutchinson, her children, and others accompanying her travelled for more than six days by foot in the April snow to get from Boston to Roger Williams' settlement at Providence.[94] They took boats to get to Aquidneck Island, where many men had gone ahead of them to begin constructing houses.[95] In the second week of April, she reunited with her husband, from whom she had been separated for nearly six months.[95]

Final pregnancy

Following the stress of her trial, her imprisonment all winter, and the difficult trip to Aquidneck Island, Hutchinson went into labour in May 1638. She delivered what her doctor, John Clarke,[96] described as a handful of transparent grapes. This is known now as a hydatidiform mole, a condition occurring most often in women over 45, resulting from one or two sperm cells fertilising a blighted egg.[97] Hutchinson had been ill most of the winter, with unusual weakness, throbbing headaches and bouts of vomiting.[97] Most writers on the subject agree that Hutchinson had been pregnant during her trial. The historian Emery Battis, citing expert opinion, suggests that she may not have been pregnant at all during that time, but displaying acute symptoms of menopause.[96] The following April after reuniting with her husband, she became pregnant, only to miscarry the hydatidiform mole.[96] A woman who, for 25 years, had undergone a continuous cycle of pregnancies, deliveries, and lactations, with the burdens of raising a large family and subjected to the extreme stress of her trials, could have suffered severe menopausal symptoms.[98]

The Puritan leaders of the Massachusetts Bay Colony gloated over Hutchinson's suffering and also that of Mary Dyer, a follower who suffered the premature and stillbirth of a severely deformed infant. The leaders classified the women's misfortunes as the judgement of God.[93] Winthrop wrote, "She brought forth not one, but thirty monstrous births or thereabouts", then continued, "see how the wisdom of God fitted this judgment to her sin every way, for look—as she had vented misshapen opinions, so she must bring forth deformed monsters."[99] Massachusetts continued to persecute Hutchinson's followers who stayed in the Boston area. When laymen were sent from the Boston church to Portsmouth to convince Hutchinson of her errors, she shouted at them, "the Church at Boston? I know no such church, neither will I own it. Call it the whore and strumpet of Boston, but no Church of Christ!"[92]

Dissension in government

Less than a year after Pocasset was settled, it suffered rifts and civil difficulties. Coddington, who had openly supported Hutchinson following her trial, had become autocratic, and began to alienate his fellow settlers.[100] Early in 1639, Hutchinson became acquainted with Samuel Gorton, who attacked the legitimacy of the magistrates.[101] On 28 April 1639, Gorton and a dozen other men ejected Coddington from power. While Hutchinson may not have supported this rebellion, her husband was chosen as the new governor. Two days later, over 30 men signed a document forming a new "civil body politic". Winthrop noted in his journal that at Aquidneck,

"the people grew very tumultuous and put out Mr. Coddington and the other three magistrates, and chose Mr. William Hutchinson only, a man of very mild temper and weak parts, and wholly guided by his wife, who had been the beginner of all the former troubles in the country and still continued to breed disturbance."[44]

Coddington and several others left the colony, establishing the settlement of Newport at the south end of the island. The freemen of Pocasset changed the name of their town to Portsmouth. They adopted a new government which provided for trial by jury and separation of church and state.[93] The men who accompanied Coddington to Newport tended to be the strongest leaders; several, such as Coggeshall, Nicholas Easton, William Brenton, Jeremy Clarke, and Henry Bull, became presidents or governors of the entire united colony after 1646.[102] On 12 March 1640, the towns of Portsmouth and Newport agreed to re-unite peacefully. Coddington became governor of the island, and William Hutchinson was chosen as one of his assistants. The towns were to remain autonomous with laws made by the citizens.[93]

During her tenure in Portsmouth, Hutchinson developed a new philosophy concerning religion. She persuaded her husband to resign from his position as a magistrate, as Roger Williams put it, "because of the opinion, which she had newly taken up, of the unlawfulness of magistracy."[93]

Sometime after June 1641, Hutchinson's husband, Will, died at the age of 55, the same age at which Anne's father had died.[103][104] He was buried in Portsmouth. No record of his death exists, because there was no established church, which would have been the customary repository for such records.[103]

New Netherland

A photograph of a very large rock, about the size of a small truck, that has a large fissure in the middle.  The rock is surrounded by trees and other vegetation.
Split Rock, near where the Hutchinson family was massacred

Not long after the settlement of Aquidneck Island, the Massachusetts Bay Colony made some serious threats to take over the island and the entire Narragansett Bay area, causing Hutchinson and other settlers much anxiety. This compelled her to move totally out of the reach of the Bay colony and its sister colonies in Connecticut, and New Haven and move into the jurisdiction of the Dutch.[105] Sometime after the summer of 1642, Hutchinson, seven of her children, a son-in-law, and several servants, 16 total persons by several accounts, went to New Netherland. There they settled near an ancient landmark called Split Rock, not far from what would become the Hutchinson River in northern Bronx, New York City.[105] Other Rhode Island families were in the area, including the Throckmortons and the Cornells. By one account Hutchinson bought her land from John Throckmorton (for whom Throggs Neck is named) who had earlier been a settler of Providence with Roger Williams, but was now living in New Netherland.[105]

While staying temporarily in an abandoned house, the Hutchinsons' permanent house was being built with the help of James Sands, who had married Katherine Walker, a granddaughter of William Hutchinson's brother Edward.[106] Sands later became a settler of Block Island (later New Shoreham, Rhode Island), and the Reverend Samuel Niles, another early settler of Block Island, recorded the following about Sands' experience in New Netherland:

Mrs. Hutchinson... removed to Rhode Island, but making no long stay there, she went further westward to a place called Eastchester, now in the eastern part of the province of New York, where she prepared to settle herself; but not to the good liking of the Indians that lived back in the woods, as the sequel proves. In order to pursue her purpose, she agreed with Captain James Sands, then a young man, to build her house, and he took a partner with him in the business... there came a company of Indians to the frame where he was at work, and made a great shout and sat down. After some time, they gathered up his tools, put his broad axe on his shoulders and his other tools into his hands, and made signs for him to go away. But he seemed to take no notice of them, but continued in his work.[107]

Thus the natives gave overt clues that they were displeased with the settlement being formed there. While the property had supposedly been secured by an agent of the Dutch West India Company in 1640, the negotiation was transacted with members of the Siwanoy people in distant Norwalk, and the local natives likely had little to do with that transaction, if they even knew of it at all.[108] Hutchinson was therefore taking a considerable risk in putting a permanent dwelling at this site.[108]

The exact location of the Hutchinson house has been a source of great interest for several centuries. LaPlante, in her recent biography of Hutchinson, hints that the homestead was near the Indian Trail that went through modern-day Pelham Bay Park, on the east side of the Hutchinson River. Offering another hypothesis, Lockwood Barr, citing the extensive land title research of Otto Hufeland published by the Westchester Historical Society in 1929, concluded that the site of the homestead was on the west side of the Hutchinson River in Eastchester.[109] A map in Barr's book that appeared in the 1929 work shows the property bordering the river in an area that is now called Baychester, between two creeks called Rattlesnake Brook and Black Dog Brook.[110] This area of the Bronx is now highly developed, and while Rattlesnake Brook is extant, mostly in underground culverts,[111] Black Dog Brook is defunct.[112]


The Hutchinsons were unfortunate in the timing of their settlement in this area, and soon became victims of the local unrest. The Dutch governor, Willem Kieft, had aroused the ire of the natives with his inhumanity and treachery.[105] Mrs. Hutchinson, who had a favourable relationship with the Narragansett people in Rhode Island, likely felt a false sense of safety among the Siwanoy of New Netherland.[105] The Hutchinsons had been friendly to them but following their mistreatment by the Dutch, these natives ravaged the New Netherland colony in a series of incidents known as Kieft's War. The fate of the Hutchinson family was aptly summarised by LaPlante:

Sketch of a crouched woman who is sheltering a small child, with four other children nearby. The children are being attacked by seven native Americans wielding tomahawks and knives, near the doorway of a dwelling house. There is a dead or dying young man lying on the ground in the foreground.
Massacre of the Hutchinsons

The Siwanoy warriors stampeded into the tiny settlement above Pelham Bay, prepared to burn down every house. The Siwanoy chief, Wampage, who had sent a warning, expected to find no settlers present. But at one house the men in animal skins encountered several children, young men and women, and a woman past middle age. One Siwanoy indicated that the Hutchinsons should restrain the family's dogs. Without apparent fear, one of the family tied up the dogs. As quickly as possible, the Siwanoy seized and scalped Francis Hutchinson, William Collins, several servants, the two Annes (mother and daughter), and the younger children—William, Katherine, Mary, and Zuriel. As the story was later recounted in Boston, one of the Hutchinson's daughters, "seeking to escape," was caught "as she was getting over a hedge, and they drew her back again by the hair of the head to the stump of a tree, and there cut off her head with a hatchet.[113]

The warriors then dragged the bodies into the house along with the cattle, and set fire to the place, which burned to the ground.[113] During the attack, Hutchinson's nine-year-old daughter, Susanna, is said to have been out picking blueberries, and was found, according to legend, hidden in the crevice of Split Rock, nearby.[114] She is believed to have had red hair, unusual to the attackers, and perhaps because of this curiosity her life was spared. She was taken captive and by one account was named "Autumn Leaf",[115] and lived with the Native Americans for two to six years (accounts vary) until ransomed back to her family members, most of whom were living in Boston.[116]

The exact date of the Hutchinson massacre is not known. The first definitive record of the occurrence was in John Winthrop's journal, where it was recorded as the first entry made for the month of September, though not dated.[117] Since it took days or even weeks for Winthrop to receive the news, the event almost certainly occurred in August 1643, and this is the date found in most sources.[117][114] While some accounts offer an exact date for the massacre, they provide no source or evidence.

The reaction in Massachusetts to Hutchinson's death was predictably harsh. The Reverend [120]

After the massacre, Wampage, the warrior who claimed to have slain Hutchinson, had assumed her name, calling himself "Anne Hoeck," thus being honoured by using the name of his most famous victim.[105] Eleven years after the event, Wampage confirmed a deed transferring the Hutchinsons' former property to Thomas Pell, with his name on the document being given as "Ann Hoeck alias Wampage."[105]

Historical impact

The role of gender

Hutchinson may have been persecuted because in preaching, she was stepping beyond the gender role then considered appropriate for a woman. Some historians suggest that she fell victim to contemporary mores surrounding the role of women in Puritan society. Hutchinson spoke her mind freely within the context of a male hierarchy unaccustomed to outspoken women. John Winthrop described her as "a woman of ready wit and bold spirit".[121] The extent to which she was persecuted was perhaps proportional to the threat the Puritan clergy saw in her, considering that many people were willing to listen to and follow her. The close relationship between church and state in Massachusetts Bay meant that a challenge to the ministers was quickly interpreted as challenge to established authority of all kinds.[121]

Hutchinson failed to appreciate what the court knew all too well: that "the force of the female heretic vastly exceeds her heresy".[122] It was difficult for the court to pin a crime on her; her true crime in their eyes was the violation of her role in Puritan society.[122] She was thus condemned for undertaking the roles of teacher, minister, magistrate, and husband.[122]

Heretic label

To the chagrin of clergy and colony officials, Hutchinson interpreted the doctrine of the Perseverance of the saints according to the Free Grace model, which taught that the saved could sin freely without endangering their salvation, instead of the Lordship salvation model prevalent at that time, which noted that those who were truly saved would demonstrate by seeking to follow the ways of their Saviour. She also claimed that she could identify "the elect" among the colonists.[123] These positions ultimately caused John Cotton, John Winthrop, and other former friends to view her as an antinomian heretic.[123]

Church and secular politics

In his article on Hutchinson in Forerunner magazine, Jay Rogers articulates the view that Hutchinson's interpretations were not "antithetical to what the Puritans believed at all. What began as the quibbling over fine points of Christian doctrine ended as a confrontation over the role of authority in the colony."[124] Hutchinson may have criticised the established religious authorities, as did others, but she did so while cultivating an energetic following. That religious following was large enough to be a significant force in secular politics. Hutchinson may have doomed herself by her strong support of Henry Vane, who was replaced by Winthrop who presided at her civil trial—as much as for the specific content of her religious views.[124]

Modern view

Hutchinson is famous not so much for what she did or said during the Antinomian Controversy, but for what John Winthrop made of her in his journal and in his account of the controversy called the Short Story. Though inaccurately portrayed, to Winthrop, Hutchinson became the reason for all of the difficulties that the colony had gone through, and with her departure, any other lingering issues were swept under the carpet.[125] Winthrop's account has given Hutchinson near legendary status, and as with all legends, what exactly she stood for has shifted over the centuries.[125] To Winthrop, Hutchinson was a "hell-spawned agent of destructive anarchy".[125] To 19th century America she was a crusader for religious liberty, as the nation celebrated its new achievement of the separation of church and state. Finally, in the 20th century she became a feminist leader, credited with terrifying the patriarchs, not because of her religious views, but because she was an assertive, highly visible woman.[125]

Historian Michael Winship calls Hutchinson "a prophet, spiritual adviser, mother of fifteen, and important participant in a fierce religious controversy that shook the infant Massachusetts Bay Colony from 1636 to 1638."[126] Upheld equally as a symbol of religious freedom, liberal thinking and Christian feminism, Anne Hutchinson is a contentious figure, having been lionised, mythologised and demonised by various writers. In particular, historians and other observers have interpreted and re-interpreted her life within the following frameworks: the status of women, power struggles within the Church, and a similar struggle within the secular political structure. As to her overall historical impact, in his 2005 book on Hutchinson and the Free Grace Controversy, Winship writes, "Hutchinson's well-publicized trials and the attendant accusations against her made her the most famous, or infamous, English woman in colonial American history."[126]

Memorials and legacy

In front of the State House in Boston, Massachusetts stands a statue of Anne Hutchinson with her daughter Susanna as a child. The statue, dedicated in 1922, has an inscription on the marble pediment that reads:

Photograph of historical plaque affixed to a rock describing Anne Hutchinnson property now in Quincy, Massachusetts
Anne Hutchinson historical plaque at Hutchinson Square, Quincy, Massachusetts, near where the Hutchinsons had a farm

A photograph of a metal statue of a woman standing upright with her head tilted upward and her eyes looking up.  She is dressed in a full dress, and beside her is a young girl who is clinging on to her.
Anne Hutchinson Memorial at Massachusetts State House by Cyrus Edwin Dallin





20 JULY 1595 [sic]






Another memorial to Hutchinson was erected south of Boston in Quincy, Massachusetts, at the corner of Beale Street and Grandview Avenue. This is near the location where the Hutchinsons owned a 600-acre farm with a house, and this is where they stayed for several days in early spring 1638 while making the trip from Boston to their new home on Aquidneck Island.[94]

Literary works

According to Hutchinson biographer Eve LaPlante, some literary critics trace the character of Hester Prynne in Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter to Hutchinson's persecution in the Massachusetts Bay Colony.[128] Historian Amy Lang wrote that Hester Prynne was the embodiment of a fictional Anne Hutchinson—a Hutchinson created by the early Puritan chroniclers.[129] Lang notes that Hester was what orthodox Puritans said Hutchinson was, either in reality or at least spiritually.[129] The parallel is that Hutchinson was the heretic who metaphorically seduced the Puritan community, while in Hawthorne's novel Hester Prynne literally seduced the minister of her community.[130]

Anne Hutchinson and her political struggle with Governor Winthrop are depicted in the 1980 play Goodly Creatures by William Gibson. Other notable historical characters who appear in the play are Reverend John Cotton, Governor Harry Vane, and future Quaker martyr Mary Dyer.[131] In January 2014, Dan Shore's opera Anne Hutchinson, with libretto by William A. Fregosi and Fritz Bell, was performed twice in Boston, Massachusetts by the Intermezzo Opera Company.[132] In February 2015, researcher Claire Bellerjeau discovered and positively identified a tribute poem to Anne Hutchinson written in 1770 by Jupiter Hammon, the first published Black American poet.[133]


photograph of a multi-coloured carved wooden sign which reads
Anne Hutchinson/Mary Dyer Memorial Herb Garden at Founders' Brook Park, Portsmouth, Rhode Island

In southern New York, the Hutchinson River, one of the very few rivers named after a woman, and the Hutchinson River Parkway are her most prominent namesakes.[134] Elementary schools, such as in the Westchester County towns of Pelham and Eastchester are named for her.[135][136]

In Portsmouth, Rhode Island, Anne Hutchinson and her friend,

Anne Hutchinson was inducted into the National Women's Hall of Fame in 1994:

  • Trial and Interrogation of Anne Hutchinson (1637)
  • statue info Background on the Anne Hutchinson statue; while this source gives a dedication year of 1915, most other sources give the year as 1922.
  • Hutchinson massacre
  • Sermon about Hutchinson The perspective of a modern female minister
  • Hutchinson marker in Quincy
  • Harvard's Midwife Hutchinson's connection with Harvard College

External links

  • The article includes an annotated transcription of Hutchinson's "Immediate Revelation."

Further reading

Online sources


  1. ^ a b Anderson 2003, p. 479.
  2. ^ a b c Bremer 1981, p. 1.
  3. ^ a b LaPlante 2004, p. 19.
  4. ^ LaPlante 2004, p. 26.
  5. ^ LaPlante 2004, p. 27.
  6. ^ LaPlante 2004, pp. 29–30.
  7. ^ a b LaPlante 2004, p. 31.
  8. ^ Winship 2005, p. 9.
  9. ^ Colket 1936, pp. 33–34.
  10. ^ LaPlante 2004, pp. 31–32.
  11. ^ a b LaPlante 2004, p. 34.
  12. ^ a b c Bremer 1981, p. 2.
  13. ^ a b c LaPlante 2004, p. 37.
  14. ^ a b c d LaPlante 2004, p. 85.
  15. ^ a b c d Hall 1990, p. 5.
  16. ^ LaPlante 2004, p. 86.
  17. ^ Hall 1990, p. x.
  18. ^ LaPlante 2004, pp. 86–87.
  19. ^ a b c d Bremer 1981, p. 3.
  20. ^ LaPlante 2004, p. 87.
  21. ^ Winship 2005, p. 7.
  22. ^ a b c Champlin 1913, p. 3.
  23. ^ Champlin 1913, pp. 3–4.
  24. ^ a b Champlin 1913, p. 4.
  25. ^ LaPlante 2004, p. 156.
  26. ^ a b LaPlante 2004, p. 154.
  27. ^ LaPlante 2004, p. 257.
  28. ^ LaPlante 2004, pp. 155–156.
  29. ^ a b c d e f g Bremer 1981, p. 4.
  30. ^ a b Winship 2005, p. 33.
  31. ^ a b c Winship 2005, p. 35.
  32. ^ a b c Winship 2005, p. 39.
  33. ^ Winship 2005, p. 34.
  34. ^ LaPlante 2004, p. 39.
  35. ^ a b c Hall 1990, p. 6.
  36. ^ Winship 2002, p. 41.
  37. ^ a b Battis 1962, p. 105.
  38. ^ Bremer 1995, p. 66.
  39. ^ a b c Bremer 1981, p. 5.
  40. ^ a b Winship 2002, pp. 64–69.
  41. ^ Winship 2002, pp. 44–45.
  42. ^ Winship 2002, pp. 6–7.
  43. ^ Anderson 2003, pp. 481–482.
  44. ^ a b c Anderson 2003, p. 482.
  45. ^ Winship 2002, p. 86.
  46. ^ Winship 2002, pp. 86–89.
  47. ^ Winship 2002, p. 90.
  48. ^ a b Hall 1990, p. 3.
  49. ^ Winship 2002, p. 22.
  50. ^ Hall 1990, p. 4.
  51. ^ Bell 1876, p. 11.
  52. ^ Winship 2002, p. 116.
  53. ^ Dunn 1981, p. 143.
  54. ^ Winship 2002, pp. 126–148.
  55. ^ Winship 2002, pp. 167–168.
  56. ^ Winship 2002, p. 170.
  57. ^ Winship 2002, pp. 170–171.
  58. ^ a b c d Winship 2002, p. 172.
  59. ^ a b Winship 2002, p. 173.
  60. ^ a b Morris 1981, p. 60.
  61. ^ LaPlante 2004, p. 68.
  62. ^ Winship 2002, pp. 173–174.
  63. ^ a b Winship 2002, p. 175.
  64. ^ a b Winship 2002, p. 176.
  65. ^ Morris 1981, p. 62.
  66. ^ Adams 1894, p. 175.
  67. ^ a b Winship 2002, p. 177.
  68. ^ Winship 2002, p. 178.
  69. ^ Winship 2002, p. 180.
  70. ^ Winship 2002, pp. 181–182.
  71. ^ Winship 2002, p. 182.
  72. ^ a b Morris 1981, p. 63.
  73. ^ Winship 2002, pp. 182–183.
  74. ^ Winship 2002, p. 183.
  75. ^ Crawford 1970, pp. 144–146.
  76. ^ a b Morgan 1981, p. 57.
  77. ^ LaPlante 2004, p. 158.
  78. ^ a b c LaPlante 2004, p. 159.
  79. ^ Winship 2005, p. 122.
  80. ^ Winship 2002, p. 197.
  81. ^ a b Battis 1962, p. 235.
  82. ^ Battis 1962, p. 236.
  83. ^ a b c Battis 1962, p. 242.
  84. ^ Winship 2002, p. 202.
  85. ^ a b Battis 1962, p. 243.
  86. ^ a b Battis 1962, p. 244.
  87. ^ Winship 2002, p. 203.
  88. ^ a b Winship 2002, p. 204.
  89. ^ Winship 2002, p. 206.
  90. ^ Winship 2002, pp. 207–208.
  91. ^ Battis 1962, pp. 246–247.
  92. ^ a b Morris 1981, p. 64.
  93. ^ a b c d e Rothbard 1975, p. 22.
  94. ^ a b LaPlante 2004, p. 208.
  95. ^ a b LaPlante 2004, p. 212.
  96. ^ a b c Battis 1981, p. 16.
  97. ^ a b LaPlante 2004, p. 217.
  98. ^ Battis 1981, p. 17.
  99. ^ LaPlante 2004, p. 218.
  100. ^ LaPlante 2004, p. 222.
  101. ^ LaPlante 2004, p. 223.
  102. ^ Arnold 1859, p. 132.
  103. ^ a b LaPlante 2004, p. 228.
  104. ^ Anderson 2003, pp. 479–481.
  105. ^ a b c d e f g Champlin 1913, p. 11.
  106. ^ Barr 1946, p. 7.
  107. ^ Barr 1946, p. 8.
  108. ^ a b Bolton 1922, p. 44.
  109. ^ Barr 1946, p. 5.
  110. ^ Barr 1946, pp. 28–29, plate VI.
  111. ^ Corbett.
  112. ^ New York Parks 2001.
  113. ^ a b LaPlante 2004, p. 237.
  114. ^ a b LaPlante 2004, p. 239.
  115. ^ Pritchard 2002, pp. 1–42.
  116. ^ Kirkpatrick 1998, p. 228.
  117. ^ a b Anderson 2003, pp. 479–81.
  118. ^ Champlin 1913, p. 12.
  119. ^ LaPlante 2004, p. 243.
  120. ^ a b LaPlante 2004, p. 244.
  121. ^ a b Lauter 2006, p. 308.
  122. ^ a b c Lang 1987, p. 65.
  123. ^ a b Humpherey 1919, pp. 18–29.
  124. ^ a b Rogers 2008.
  125. ^ a b c d Winship 2005, p. 4.
  126. ^ a b Winship 2005, p. 1.
  127. ^ RI Gov.
  128. ^ LaPlante 2004, p. xvii.
  129. ^ a b Lang 1987, p. 165.
  130. ^ Lang 1987, pp. 165–166.
  131. ^ Gibson 1986, p. 4.
  132. ^ Intermezzo Opera 2013.
  133. ^ Bleyer 2015.
  134. ^ Hutchinson River Parkway.
  135. ^ Pelham Patch 2012.
  136. ^ Anne Hutchinson School 2012.
  137. ^ Heritage Passage.
  138. ^ Herald News 2011.
  139. ^ Satucket Lectionary.
  140. ^ LaPlante 2004, p. 256.
  141. ^ a b c d e f g h i j Anderson 2003, pp. 480–481.
  142. ^ a b c Kirkpatrick 1998, p. vii.
  143. ^ Austin 1887, p. 272.
  144. ^ Roberts 2009, pp. 365–366.
  145. ^ a b Family Search 2008.
  146. ^ Austin 1887, p. 171.
  147. ^ Champlin 1914, p. 18.
  148. ^ Roberts 2008, p. 278.
  149. ^ Richardson 2004, p. 492.
  150. ^ Anderson 2003, p. 484.
Calvinism portal


See also

In 1914, John Champlin published the bulk of the currently known ancestry of Anne Hutchinson, showing her descent on her father's side of the family from Charlemagne and Alfred the Great.[147] Gary Boyd Roberts and others have published her line of descent on her mother's side from Edward I of England, thus connecting her with Edward's great grandparents, Henry II of England and his wife, Eleanor of Aquitaine.[148][149] Most of the material in the following ancestor chart is from Champlin, except for the Williamson line which was published in The American Genealogist by F. N. Craig in 1992.[150]


As with many other colonial American settlers, Anne Hutchinson has numerous descendants, many of whom have reached great prominence. Three United States presidents, Mitt Romney.[145] Her grandson, Peleg Sanford, was a colonial governor of Rhode Island.[146] Other descendants include Chief Justice of the United States Supreme Court, Melville Weston Fuller, and Associate Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.; a Lord Chancellor of England, John Singleton Copley, Jr. who was the first Lord Lyndhurst; and a President of Harvard University, Charles William Eliot. One descendant bearing the Hutchinson name was her ill-fated great-great-grandson, Thomas Hutchinson, who was a loyalist Governor of the Province of Massachusetts Bay at the time of the Boston Tea Party, an event leading to the American Revolutionary War.[145]

Photograph of a man with longish dark hair; he is wearing formal attire which consists of a dark vest, a white shirt, and a tie of the style worn in 1860.
Stephen A. Douglas descends from Hutchinson.


Of Hutchinson's dozen or more siblings who survived childhood, only one other came to New England; her youngest sister, Katharine, the wife of Richard Scott, came to Boston and then Providence. With her husband, Katharine was a Puritan, Baptist, and then Quaker, and was whipped in Boston for supporting her future son-in-law Christopher Holder who had his right ear cut off for his Quaker evangelism.[143]

The oldest child, Edward, baptised 28 May 1613, signed the Portsmouth Compact, and settled on Aquidneck Island with his parents, but soon made peace with the Massachusetts authorities, and returned to Boston.[141] He was an officer in the colonial militia, and died from wounds received during King Philip's War. Susanna, baptised 4 September 1614, died in Alford during the plague in 1630, and Richard, baptised 8 December 1615 was admitted to the Boston church in 1634, but returned to England, after which no further record has been found.[141] Faith, baptised 14 August 1617, married Thomas Savage, and lived in Boston, dying about 1651.[141][142] Bridget, baptised 15 January 1618/9, married John Sanford and lived in Portsmouth, Rhode Island where her husband was briefly governor of the island, and died by 1698.[141][142] Francis, baptised 24 December 1620, was the oldest of the children to perish in the massacre in New Netherland, and Elizabeth, baptised 17 February 1621/2 died during the plague in Alford, and was buried there on 4 October 1630.[141] William, baptised 22 June 1623 died during infancy, and Samuel, baptised 17 December 1624, lived in Boston, married, and had a child, but left behind few records.[141] Anne, baptised 5 May 1626 married William Collins, and both of them went to New Netherland and perished in the massacre with her mother.[141] Mary, baptised 22 February 1627/8; Katherine, baptised 7 February 1629/30; William, baptised 28 September 1631; and Zuriel (daughter), baptised in Boston 13 March 1635/6, were all children when they went with their mother to New Netherland, and were killed during the Indian massacre in the late summer of 1643.[141] Susanna, the 14th child of the Hutchinsons, and the youngest born in England, baptised 15 November 1633, survived the Indian attack in 1643, was taken captive, and eventually traded to the English, after which she married John Cole, and with him had 11 children.[142]

Painting of a balding man with grey hair.  The man is wearing a highly decorated coat, and he is holding a staff of sorts.
Major Thomas Savage married Hutchinson's daughter, Faith.

Anne and William Hutchinson had 15 children, all of them born and baptised in Alford except for the last child who was baptised in Boston, Massachusetts.[141] Of the 14 children born in England, 11 lived to sail to New England.[141]

Immediate family


In 1987, Massachusetts Governor Michael Dukakis pardoned Anne Hutchinson, revoking the order of banishment by Governor Winthrop 350 years earlier.[140]


Hutchinson is honoured together with Roger Williams with a feast day on the liturgical calendar of the Episcopal Church in the United States of America on 5 February.[139]


This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.