World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Apical dominance

Article Id: WHEBN0000209825
Reproduction Date:

Title: Apical dominance  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Epicormic shoot, Apical, Hyperhydricity, Axillary bud, Cushion plant
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Apical dominance

Many conifers show particularly strong apical dominance, strongest of all being in the family Araucariaceae, showing a single erect central trunk with strongly differentiated horizontal branching. Cuttings of Araucariaceae species taken from a side branch will not develop erect growth. Araucaria heterophylla, New Zealand.

Apical dominance is the phenomenon whereby the main, central stem of the plant is dominant over (i.e., grows more strongly than) other side stems; on a branch the main stem of the branch is further dominant over its own side branchlets.

Plant physiology describes apical dominance as the control exerted by the terminal bud (and shoot apex) over the outgrowth of lateral buds.[1]


  • Overview 1
  • Apex removal 2
  • Applications 3
  • See also 4
  • References 5


Apical dominance occurs when the shoot apex inhibits the growth of lateral buds so that the plant may grow vertically. It is important for the plant to devote energy to growing upward so that it can get more light to undergo photosynthesis. If the plant utilizes available energy for growing upward, it may be able to outcompete other individuals in the near vicinity. Plants that were capable of outcompeting neighboring plants likely had higher fitness. Apical dominance is therefore most likely adaptive.

Typically, the end of a shoot contains an apical bud, which is the location where shoot growth occurs. The apical bud produces an auxin (IAA) that inhibits growth of the lateral buds further down on the stem towards the axillary bud. It was first discovered that the plant hormone auxin likely regulates apical dominance in 1934.[2] Auxin is predominantly produced in the growing shoot apex and is transported throughout the plant via the phloem and diffuses into lateral buds which prevents elongation.[3]

When the apical bud is removed, the lowered IAA concentration allows the lateral buds to grow and produce new shoots, which compete to become the lead growth.

Weeping larch showing growth habit is lacking apical dominance.

Apex removal

Plant physiologists have identified four different stages the plant goes through after the apex is removed (Stages I-IV). The four stages are referred to as

  1. lateral bud formation,
  2. "imposition of inhibition" (apical dominance),
  3. initiation of lateral bud outgrowth following decapitation, and
  4. elongation and development of the lateral bud into a branch.

These stages can also be defined by the hormones that are regulating the process which are as follows: Stage I, cytokinin promoted, causing the lateral bud to form since cytokinin plays a role in cell division; Stage II, auxin is promoted, resulting in apical dominance ("imposition of inhibition"); Stage III, cytokinin released resulting in outward growth of the lateral bud; and Stage IV, auxin is decreased and gibberellic acid is promoted which results in cell division, enabling the bud or branch to continue outward growth.[1]

More simply stated, lateral bud formation is inhibited by the shoot apical meristem (SAM). The lateral bud primordium (from which the lateral bud develops) is located below SAM. The shoot tip rising from the SAM inhibits the growth of the lateral bud by repressing auxin. When the shoot is cut off, the lateral bud begins to lengthen which is mediated by a release of cytokinin. Once the apical dominance has been lifted from the plant, elongation and lateral growth is promoted and the lateral buds grow into new branches. When lateral bud formation prevents the plant from growing upward, it is undergoing lateral dominance. Often, lateral dominance can be triggered by decapitating the SAM or artificially decreasing the concentration of auxin in plant tissues.


When apical meristems (apical buds) are removed constantly, the shape of tree can be manipulated remarkably, because newer, uninhibited branches grow en mass on most any positions of the tree/shrub.
Topiary garden, Beckley Park manor, UK

When the apical bud is removed, the lowered IAA concentration allows the lateral buds to grow and produce new shoots, which compete to become the lead growth. Pruning techniques such as coppicing and pollarding make use of this natural response to damage to direct plant growth and produce a desired shape, size, and/or productivity level for the plant. The principle of apical dominance is manipulated for espalier creation, hedge building, or artistic sculptures called topiary. If the SAM is removed, it stimulates growth in the lateral direction. By careful pruning, it is possible to create remarkable designs or patterns.

Some fruit trees have strong apical dominance, and young trees can become "leggy", with poor side limb development. Apical dominance can be reduced in this case, or in cases where limbs are broken off by accident, by cutting off the auxin flow above side buds that one wishes to stimulate. This is often done by orchardists for young trees.

Occasionally, strong apical dominance is advantageous, as in the "Ballerina" apple trees. These trees are intended to be grown in small gardens, and their strong apical dominance combined with a dwarfing rootstock gives a compact narrow tree with very short fruiting side branches.

See also


  1. ^ a b Cline, M (1994). "The role of hormones in apical dominance. New approaches to an old problem in plant development". Physiologia Plantarum 90: 230–237.  
  2. ^ Thimann, K.V.; F. Skoog (1934). "On the inhibition of bud development and other functions of growth substance in Vicia faba.".  
  3. ^ Booker, Jonathon; Steven Chatfield; Ottoline Leyser (February 2003). "Auxin acts in xylem-associated or Medullary cells to mediate apical dominance". Plant Cell 15: 495–507.  
  • Thimann, Kenneth V.; Skoog, Folke (1933). "Studies on the growth hormone of plants: III. The inhibiting action of the growth hormone on bud development" (PDF). Proceeding National Academy Sciences (USA) 19 (7): 714–716.  
  • Dun, Elizabeth Ann; Ferguson, Brett James; Beveridge, Christine Anne (2006). "Apical Dominance and Shoot Branching. Divergent Opinions or Divergent Mechanisms?". Plant Physiology 142 (3): 812–819.  
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.