World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Corporate social media

Article Id: WHEBN0028723663
Reproduction Date:

Title: Corporate social media  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Social media, Corpocracy, Corporate pathos, Corporate appointeeship, Corporate synergy
Collection: Business, Social Media
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Corporate social media

Corporate social media is the use of social media by and within corporations.[1]

Today, an increasing number of corporations, across most industries, have adopted the use of social media in the workplace. As a result, corporate use of social networking and micro blogging sites such as Facebook, Twitter, Pinterest, and LinkedIn, has substantially increased. According to an April 2014 article by the Harvard Business Review, "Fifty-eight percent of companies are currently engaged in social networks like Facebook, microblogs like Twitter, and sharing multimedia on platforms such as YouTube." The Harvard Business Review cites an additional 21% of companies as being in the process of implementing a formal social media initiative.[2]

The 2014 HBR report indicates 79% of companies have or will have social media initiatives in place. This percentage is an increase over a similar 2010 report that indicated that two-thirds of companies had or would have social media initiatives in place.[3]

The widespread and growing use of social media by corporations is resulting in the development and implementation of formal written policies. Corporate social media use has grown so rapidly that certain regulated industries are now required to maintain formal written social media policies. For example, the [4]

Corporations can also find themselves at risk when it comes to their employees’ use of social media as well. Social media environments have created the need for distinct and often strict reputation-management practices. Some corporations have resorted to monitoring the social media accounts of it’s employees in order to spot posts and comments that are related to the workplace, potentially harmful to business or even leak private corporate information.[5]

Many corporations have utilized social media during the hiring process as well. Survey data shows that within a one-year period 15 percent of finance and accounting professionals found new jobs through social media.[6] Social media can be both helpful and detrimental to those searching for employment. Hiring managers sometimes search social media for reasons not to hire a job applicant. According to a 2013 survey from, 43 percent of employers use social networking sites to research potential hires. Another 45 percent are researching possible fits by conducting a search via Google or another search engine. 51 percent of employers who research candidates on social media say they've found postings which have caused them to not hire a candidate.[7]

Despite the identified risks associated with social media, corporations are recognizing the benefits associated with adopting a corporate social media strategy. Such benefits include lower cost and more effective marketing and advertising initiatives, internal and external corporate communications, and overall brand awareness. As a result, corporations are investing at an increasing rate in social business software and services such as Jive Engage, Yammer or eXo Platform. The belief is that the benefits outweigh the potential risks of bad press, customer complaints, and brand bashing.

Conversely, businesses can find themselves in a bad situation when they use social media poorly. An example of poor social media execution came in November 2013 when JP Morgan decided to have a question and answer session via Twitter. During that time, 2 out of 3 tweets received were negative due to prior scrutiny they had faced. In this case, using social media and interacting with the public did not help to promote them in a positive way. Another example came on September 11, 2013, when AT&T posted a picture on Twitter of a cell phone capturing a picture of the Twin Towers memorial lights with the caption "Never forget." The tweet was met with great backlash from consumers for using a tragedy as a marketing opportunity, with many customers threatening to leave AT&T. After seeing the backlash it was receiving, AT&T removed the post and apologized within about an hour of its posting.[8]


  1. ^ Joel Postman (2009), SocialCorp: Social Media Goes Corporate,  
  2. ^ Ennes, Meghan (April 2014). "Social Media: What Most Companies Don't Know Risks". Retrieved 25 April 2014. 
  3. ^ "The New Conversation: Taking Social Media from Talk to Action". Harvard Business Review: 1, 3. 2010. Retrieved 4 April 2013. 
  4. ^ FFIEC (December 11, 2013). "Financial Regulators Issue Final Guidance on Social Media". Retrieved 25 April 2014. 
  5. ^ Rokka, J., Karlsson, K., & Tienari, J. (2014). Balancing acts: Managing employees and reputation in social media. Journal Of Marketing Management, 30(7/8), 802-827. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2013.813577
  6. ^ Drobock, K. (2013). Is Social Media a Friend or a Foe?. Strategic Finance, 95(11), 16-18.
  7. ^ McCafferty, D. (2014). Hirers Increase Social Media Scrutiny of Recruits. CIO Insight, 1.
  8. ^ Stern, Joanna. "AT&T Slammed on Twitter and Facebook For Sept. 11 Marketing Move". ABC News. Retrieved 4 December 2013. 

Further reading

  • Navigating Social Media Legal Risks: Safeguarding Your Business
  • 2011 Fortune 500 - UMass Dartmouth
  • Big Bird Tweets: How corporations use social media to gauge public persona - Computerworld
  • Social media is reinventing how business is done –
  • How To Use Social Media To Promote Your Small Business - Forbes
  • Brand Ambassadors in the Age of Social Media
  • Rokka, J., Karlsson, K., & Tienari, J. (2014). Balancing acts: Managing employees and reputation in social media. Journal Of Marketing Management, 30(7/8), 802-827. doi:10.1080/0267257X.2013.813577
  • Drobock, K. (2013). Is Social Media a Friend or a Foe?. Strategic Finance, 95(11), 16-18.
  • McCafferty, D. (2014). Hirers Increase Social Media Scrutiny of Recruits. CIO Insight, 1.
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.