World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Criticism of monotheism

Article Id: WHEBN0016974581
Reproduction Date:

Title: Criticism of monotheism  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: André Servier, Criticism of Islam, Criticism of Jainism, Islam and violence, Criticism of Sikhism
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Criticism of monotheism

Criticism of monotheism remains prevalent throughout the history, monotheism has been criticized as total discourse.[1] Monotheism has been criticised as a cause of ignorance, oppression and violence.


Through the means of defining, it is traditionally agreed among the major monotheistic religions that the one God is, inter alia, omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent. However, one scholar argues that "this definition of God [is] contradictory to what has been perceived by us in the empirical world."[2]

Feminist thinkers have criticized the monotheistic concept as the model of highest form of patriarchal power, they argues that the one god is regarded to be male and opposed to everything related to change, sensuality, nature, feeling, and femininity.[3]

Forcing one belief

David Hume has argued that monotheism is less pluralistic and thus less tolerant than polytheism because the former stipulates that people pigeonhole their beliefs into one.[4] In the same vein, Auguste Comte argues, "Monotheism is irreconcilable with the existence in our nature of the instincts of benevolence" because it compels followers to devote themselves to a single Creator.[5]

James Lovelock criticized monotheism, due to its idea of a transcendent almighty father, he says about monotheism, "seems to anesthetize the sense of wonder as if one were committed to a single line of thought by a cosmic legal contract."[6]

Violence in monotheism

In the ancient times, monotheism is blamed as the instigator of violence in its early days as it inspired the Israelites to wage war upon the Canaanites who believed in multiple gods.[7]

Highly acclaimed Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan regarded monotheism to be one reason of violence, he said:

The intolerance of narrow monotheism is written in letters of blood across the history of man from the time when first the tribes of Israel burst into the land of Canaan. The worshippers of the one jealous God are egged on to aggressive wars against people of alien cults. They invoke divine sanction for the cruelties inflicted on the conquered. The spirit of old Israel is inherited by Christianity and Islam, and it might not be unreasonable to suggest that it would have been better for Western civilization if Greece had moulded it on this question rather than Palestine.[8]

Success of monotheistic religions

Bertrand Russell has stated that in recent history William James popularized the idea that the belief in one god causes people to not behave improperly. Furthermore, Russell expostulates through examples that whether "politicians and educators ought to try to make people think there is one [god]" is "a political one" since one cannot prove the moralistic argument of William James.[9]

See also


  1. ^ "The Origins of Biblical Monotheism: Israel's Polytheistic Background and the Ugaritic Texts", p. 11
  2. ^ Worship as a Hindrance to Self
  3. ^ Encyclopedia of religion - Volume 9 - Page 6161, by Lindsay Jones
  4. ^ "David Hume argued that unlike monotheism, polytheism is pluralistic in nature, unbound by doctrine, and therefore far more tolerant than monotheism, which tends to force people to believe in one faith." [1]
  5. ^ , page 251The Catechism of Positive Religion
  6. ^ "A Reenchanted World: The Quest for a New Kinship with Nature", by James William Gibson, p. 98, Publisher = Macmillan, Year = 2009
  7. ^ The Curse of Cain: The Violent Legacy of Monotheism ISBN 978-0-226-74199-4
  8. ^ "A Primal Perspective on the Philosophy of Religion", by Arvind Sharma, page 29
  9. ^ Is There a God?,(Commissioned by Bertrand Russell, but never published in, Illustrated Magazine, in 1952) [2]
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.