This article will be permanently flagged as inappropriate and made unaccessible to everyone. Are you certain this article is inappropriate? Excessive Violence Sexual Content Political / Social
Email Address:
Article Id: WHEBN0047365874 Reproduction Date:
Effective Competition is a concept first proposed by John Maurice Clark,[1] then under the name of "workable competition," as a "workable" alternative to the economic theory of perfect competition since perfect competition is seldom observed in the real world.[2]
's proposal resulted in extensive debate in the economic literature over the next several decades, in which Jesse W. Markham, Joe S. Bain, and many others participated.[3][4] No consensus has yet been reached over which of many potential criteria should be used to judge competition to be effective, but as an alternative to identifying specific structural criteria by which to constitute effectiveness or workability, Jesse W. Markham suggested the following definition:
An industry may be judged to be workably competitive when, after the structural characteristics of its market and the dynamic forces that shaped them have been thoroughly examined, there is no clearly indicated change than can be effected through public policy measures that would result in greater social gains than social losses.[5]
Despite the lack of consensus in the literature, the concept is often used in antitrust enforcement and public policy analysis, as a method for measuring and ensuring adequate levels of competitive performance in markets which may not be ideally structured. Charles F. Phillips, Jr. notes that "Workable or effective competition may result from conditions that are less exacting than those demanded for perfection."[6]
Public administration, Politics, Law, Policy, Foreign policy
Microeconomics, Game theory, Economics, Bitcoin, YouTube
University of Richmond, Federal Trade Commission, World War II, Harvard University, Vanderbilt University
European Union, Competition law, United States, Relevant market, United Kingdom
Singapore, Government of Singapore, Renewable energy, Ministry of Trade and Industry (Singapore), Nanyang Technological University
Law, Competition law, Statutory law, Human rights, Jurisprudence
Oligopoly, Economic theory, Competitive market, Monopolistic competition, Monopsony