World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Frankfurt Auschwitz trials

Frankfurt Auschwitz trials
Buergerhaus at Frankenalle in Frankfurt am Main-Gallus. Courthouse for the first Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial in 1963-65, 2009 photo
Court Frankfurt
Full case name Second Auschwitz trial (der zweite Auschwitz-Prozess)
Indictment 20 December 1963
Decided 19 August 1965
Case history
Subsequent action(s) Verdict in the last Auschwitz/Lagischa case: September 1977

The Frankfurt Auschwitz trials, known in German as der Auschwitz-Prozess, or der zweite Auschwitz-Prozess, (the "second Auschwitz trial") was a series of trials running from 20 December 1963 to 19 August 1965, charging 22 defendants under German criminal law for their roles in the Holocaust as mid- to lower-level officials in the Auschwitz-Birkenau death and concentration camp complex.

Overall, only 789 individuals of the approximately 6,500 surviving SS personnel who served at Auschwitz and its sub-camps were ever tried, of which 750 received sentences.[1] Unlike the first trial in Poland held almost two decades earlier, the trials in Frankfurt were not based on the legal definition of crimes against humanity as recognized by international law, but according to the state laws of the Federal Republic.[2]


  • Prior trial in Poland 1
  • Course of proceedings 2
  • Outcomes 3
  • Additional trial 4
  • Notes 5
  • References 6
  • Further reading 7
  • External links 8

Prior trial in Poland

Most of the senior leaders of the camp, including Rudolf Höss, the longest-standing commandant of the camp, were turned over to the Polish authorities in 1947 following their participation as witnesses in the Nuremberg Trial. Subsequently, the accused were tried in Kraków and many sentenced to death for violent crimes and torturing of prisoners.[3] Only SS-Untersturmführer Hans Münch was set free.[4] That original trial in Poland is usually known as the first Auschwitz Trial.

Course of proceedings

SS-Sturmbannführer Richard Baer, the last camp commandant, died in detention while still under investigation as part of the trials. Defendants ranged from members of the SS to kapos, privileged prisoners responsible for low-level control of camp internees, and included some of those responsible for the process of "selection," or determination of who should be sent to the gas chambers directly from the "ramp" upon disembarking the trains that brought them from across Europe ("selection" generally entailed inclusion of all children held to be ineligible for work, generally under the age of 14, and any mothers unwilling to part with their "selected" children). In the course of the trial, approximately 360 witnesses were called, including around 210 survivors. Proceedings began in the "Bürgerhaus Gallus", in Frankfurt am Main, which was converted into a courthouse for that purpose, and remained there until their conclusion.

Hessian Generalstaatsanwalt (State Attorney General) Fritz Bauer, himself briefly interned in the concentration camp at Heuberg in 1933, led the prosecution. Bauer was perhaps at least as concerned with establishing the character of the camps at Auschwitz-Birkenau as he was with pursuing individual defendants, which may explain in part why only 22 of an estimated 6,000 to 8,000 SS members thought to have been involved in the administration and operation of the camp were charged. The men on trial in Frankfurt were tried only for murders and other crimes that they committed on their own initiative at Auschwitz and were not tried for anything that they did at Auschwitz when following orders, which was considered by the courts to be the lesser crime of accomplice to murder.[5] At a 1963 trial of a KGB assassin named Bohdan Stashynsky who had committed several murders in the Federal Republic in the 1950s was found by a German court not legally guilty of murder.[6] Instead, Stashynsky was found to be only an accomplice to murder as the courts ruled that the responsibility for his murders rested only with his superiors in the KGB who had given him his orders.[6] The legal implication of the Stashynsky case were that the courts had ruled that in a totalitarian system only executive decision-makers could be convicted of murder and that anyone who followed orders and killed someone could be convicted only of being accomplices to murder.[6] The term executive decision-maker was so defined by the courts to apply only to the highest levels of the Reich leadership during the National Socialist period, and that all who just followed orders when killing were just accomplices to murder.[6] Someone could be only convicted of murder if was shown that they had killed someone on their own initiative, and thus all of the accused of murder at the Auschwitz trial were tried only for murders that they done on their own initiative.[5] Because of this, Bauer could only indict for murder those who killed when not following orders, and those who had killed while following orders could be indicted as accomplices to murder. Moreover, because of the legal distinction between murderers and accomplices to murder meant that a SS man who killed thousands while operating the gas chambers at Auschwitz could only be found guilty of being accomplice to murder because he had been following orders while a SS man who beaten one inmate to death on his initiative could be convicted of murder because he had not been following orders.[5]

Bauer is said to have been opposed in the former purpose by the young Helmut Kohl, then a junior member of the Christian Democratic Union. In furtherance of that purpose Bauer sought and received support from the Institute for Contemporary History in Munich. The following historians from the Institute served as expert witnesses for the prosecution; Helmut Krausnick, Hans-Adolf Jacobsen, Hans Buchheim, and Martin Broszat. Subsequently, the information the four historians gathered for the prosecution served as the basis for their 1968 book, Anatomy of the SS State, the first thorough survey of the SS based on SS records.

Information about the actions of those accused and their whereabouts had been in the possession of West German authorities since 1958, but action on their cases was delayed by jurisdictional disputes, among other considerations. The court's proceedings were largely public and served to bring many details of the Holocaust to the attention of the public in the Federal Republic of Germany, as well as abroad. Six defendants were given life sentences and several others received the maximum prison sentences possible for the charges brought against them.


The trial attracted much publicity in Germany, but was considered by Bauer to be a failure.[5] Bauer complained that the media treated the accused in such a manner as to imply that they were all freakish monsters, which allowed the German public to distance themselves from feeling any moral guilt about what had happened at Auschwitz, which was instead presented as the work of few sick people who were not at all like normal Germans.[5] Moreover, Bauer felt that because the law treated those who had followed orders when killing as accomplices to murder it implied that the policy of genocide and the Nazi rules for treating inmates at Auschwitz were in fact legitimate.[5] Bauer wrote that the way that the media had portrayed the trial had supported the "wishful fantasy that there were only a few people with responsibility ... and the rest were merely terrorized, violated hangers-on, compelled to do things completely contrary to their true nature."[5] Furthermore, Bauer charged that the judges in convicting the accused had made it sound like Germany in Nazi era had been an occupied country with most Germans having no choice, but to follow orders.[5] "But this," he said, "had nothing to do with historical reality. There were virulent nationalists, imperialists, anti-Semites and Jew-haters. Without them, Hitler was unthinkable."[5]

Name Rank, Title, or Role Sentence
Stefan Baretzki Blockführer (block chief) Life plus 8 years imprisonment
Emil Bednarek Kapo Life imprisonment
Wilhelm Boger camp Gestapo Life & 5 years imprisonment
Wilhelm Breitwieser camp uniforms, Häftlingsbekleidungskammer Released
Perry Broad camp Gestapo 4 years imprisonment
Victor Capesius pharmacist 9 years imprisonment
Klaus Dylewski camp Gestapo 5 years imprisonment
Willi Frank Head of SS dental station 7 years imprisonment
Emil Hantl Sanitätsdienstgrad (medical orderly) 3½ years imprisonment
Karl-Friedrich Höcker adjutant 7 years imprisonment
Franz-Johann Hofmann Head of protective custody camp Life imprisonment
Oswald Kaduk Rapportführer (SS NCO) Life imprisonment
Josef Klehr medical orderly Life & 15 years imprisonment
Dr. Franz Lucas SS Obersturmführer 3 years, 3 months imprisonment
Robert Mulka adjutant 14 years imprisonment
Gerhard Neubert HKB Monovitz Released
Hans Nierzwicki HKB Auschwitz 1 Released
Willi Schatz SS dentist Acquitted & released
Herbert Scherpe SS Oberscharführer 4½ years imprisonment
Bruno Schlage SS Oberscharführer 6 years imprisonment
Johann Schobert Political Division Acquitted & released
Hans Stark camp Gestapo 10 years imprisonment

Additional trial

In September 1977 an additional trial was held in Frankfurt against two former members of the SS for killings in the Auschwitz satellite camp of Lagischa (Polish: Lagisza), and on the so-called "evacuation" (i.e. death march) from Golleschau (Goleszow) to Wodzisław Śląski (German: Loslau).[7] This trial was portrayed in the film The Reader


  1. ^  
  2. ^ Shik, Naama (2014). "The Auschwitz Trials". Yad Vashem, International School for Holocaust Studies. Retrieved 2014-10-12. 
  3. ^ Paweł Brojek (Nov 24, 2012), Pierwszy proces oświęcimski (The First Auschwitz Trial). Portal Retrieved December 29, 2014.
  4. ^ Jewish Virtual Library Biography
  5. ^ a b c d e f g h i  
  6. ^ a b c d Wette, Wolfram (2006). The Wehrmacht: History, Myth, Reality (Google Books preview). Cambridge: Harvard University Press. p. 245. 
  7. ^ Neues Deutschland. Ausgabe vom 07.09.1977..uh(German)


  • Essay (in German) from the Fritz Bauer Institute
  • Part One of World Socialist Web Site coverage
  • Part Two of World Socialist Web Site coverage
  • Part Three of World Socialist Web Site coverage
  • Summary of Sentences from Jewish Virtual Library
  • Fritz-Bauer-Institut (Frankfurt) / Staatliches Museum Auschwitz-Birkenau (Hrsg): Der Auschwitz-Prozeß. Tonbandmitschnitte, Protokolle, Dokumente. DVD/ROM. Directmedia Publishing, Berlin 2004, ISBN 3-89853-501-0 (also via D. Czech: Kalendarium)
  • Verdict on Auschwitz, The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial 1963-65 at DEFA Film Library, 2006.

Further reading

  • G. Álvarez, Mónica. "Guardianas Nazis. El lado femenino del mal". Madrid: Grupo Edaf, 2012. ISBN 978-84-414-3240-6
  • Devin O. Pendas,The Frankfurt Auschwitz Trial, 1963–65: Genocide, History and the Limits of the Law (Cambridge University Press, 2006)
  • Rebecca Wittmann, Beyond Justice: the Auschwitz Trial (Harvard University Press, 2005)
  • Hermann Langbein, Der Auschwitz-Prozess.Eine Dokumentation. 2 vols, Europa Verlag, Vienna, Frankfurt, Zurich, 1965.
  • Review of "The Investigation," a play written by Peter Weiss (1965)

External links

  • Fritz Bauer Institute
  • Book review comparing Wittmann's and Pendas's monographs about the trial
  • Subset: "Frankfurt Auschwitz Trials Witnesses", Archive "Forced Labor 1939-1945"
  • Shortfilm "Testifying in Nazi Trials", Archive "Forced Labor 1939-1945"
  • Sonderkommando page (French)

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.