World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article


Article Id: WHEBN0000430260
Reproduction Date:

Title: Futhorc  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Old Frisian, Blackletter, Fehu, Armanen runes, List of inventors of writing systems, Ceirt, Westeremden yew-stick
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia


Anglo-Saxon Futhorc
Type Alphabet
Languages Old English and Old Frisian, sometimes Latin
Parent systems
Phoenician alphabet
Sister systems Younger Futhark
ISO 15924 ,
Unicode alias
This article contains IPA phonetic symbols. Without proper rendering support, you may see question marks, boxes, or other symbols instead of Unicode characters.

The Anglo-Saxon runes (also Anglo-Frisian), also known as futhorc (or fuþorc), is a runic alphabet, extended from the Elder Futhark from 24 to between 26 and 33 characters. They were used probably from the 5th century onward, recording Old English and Old Frisian.

They remained in use in Anglo-Saxon England throughout the 6th to 10th centuries, although runic script became increasingly confined to manuscript tradition as a topic of antiquarian interest after the 9th century, and it disappeared even as a learned curiosity soon after the Norman conquest.


There are competing theories as to the origins of the Anglo-Saxon futhorc. One theory proposes that it was developed in Frisia and from there spread later to England. Another holds that runes were first introduced to England from Scandinavia where the futhorc was modified and then exported to Frisia. Both theories have their inherent weaknesses, and a definitive answer likely awaits more archaeological evidence.

The early futhorc was identical to the Elder Futhark except for the split of a into three variants āc, æsc and ōs, resulting in 26 runes. This was necessary to account for the new phoneme produced by the Ingvaeonic split of allophones of long and short a. The earliest ōs rune is found on the 5th-century Undley bracteate. āc was introduced later, in the 6th century. The double-barred hægl characteristic for continental inscriptions is first attested as late as 698, on St Cuthbert's coffin; before that, the single-barred Scandinavian variant was used.

In England the futhorc was further extended to 28 and finally to 33 runes, and runic writing in England became closely associated with the Latin scriptoria from the time of Anglo-Saxon Christianization in the 7th century. The futhorc started to be replaced by the Latin alphabet from around the 7th century, although the futhorc was still sometimes used up to the 10th or 11th century. In some cases, texts would be written in the Latin alphabet but runes would be used logographically in place of the word it represented, and the þorn and wynn came to be used as extensions of the Latin alphabet. By the Norman Conquest of 1066 it was very rare and disappeared altogether shortly thereafter. From at least five centuries of use, fewer than 200 artifacts bearing futhorc inscriptions have survived.

Several famous English examples mix runes and Roman script, and/or Old English and Latin, on the same object, including the Franks Casket and St Cuthbert's coffin; in the latter, three of the names of the Four Evangelists are given in Latin written in runes but "LUKAS" (Saint Luke) is in Roman script. The coffin is also an example of an object created at the heart of the Anglo-Saxon church that uses runes. A leading expert, Raymond Ian Page, rejects the assumption often made in non-scholarly literature that runes were especially associated in post-conversion Anglo-Saxon England with Anglo-Saxon paganism or magic.[1]


The Anglo-Saxon rune poem (Cotton Otho B.x.165) has the following runes, listed with their Unicode glyphs, their names, their transliteration and their approximate phonetic value in IPA notation where different from the transliteration:

Rune Image UCS Old English name Name meaning Transliteration IPA
feoh "wealth" f [f], [v]
ūr "aurochs" u [u], [uː]
þorn "thorn" þ, ð [θ], [ð]
ōs "[a] god" o [o], [oː]
rād "ride" r [r]
cēn "torch" c [k], [kʲ], [tʃ]
gyfu "gift" g [ɡ], [ɣ], [j]
wynn "joy" w [w]
hægl "hail (precipitation)" h [h], [x]
nȳd "need, distress" n [n]
īs "ice" i [i], [iː]
gēr "year, harvest" j [j]
ēoh "yew" eo
peorð (Unknown) p [p]
eolh "elk-sedge" x [ks]
sigel "Sun" s [s], [z]
Tīr "Tiw" t [t]
beorc "birch" b [b]
eh "horse" e [e], [eː]
mann "man" m [m]
lagu "lake" l [l]
Ing "Ing (a hero)" ŋ
ēðel "estate" œ
dæg "day" d [d]
āc "oak" a [ɑ], [ɑː]
æsc "ash-tree" æ [æ], [æː]
ȳr "bow" y [y], [yː]
īor "eel" ia, io
ēar "grave" ea [æɑ], [æːɑ]

The first 24 of these directly continue the Elder Futhark letters, extended by five additional runes, representing long vowels and diphthongs (á, æ, ý, ia, ea), comparable to the five forfeda of the Ogham alphabet.

Thorn and Wynn were introduced into the Latin English alphabet to represent [θ] and [w], but then they were replaced with th and w in Middle English.

The letter sequence, and indeed the letter inventory is not fixed. Compared to the letters of the rune poem given above,

f u þ o r c ȝ w h n i j eo p x s t b e m l ŋ œ d a æ y io ea

the Thames scramasax has 28 letters, with a slightly different order, and edhel missing:

f u þ o r c ȝ w h n i io eo p x s t b e ŋ d l m j a æ y ea

The Vienna Codex has also 28 letters; the Ruthwell Cross inscription has 31 letters; Cotton Domitian A.ix (11th century) has another four additional runes:

30. cweorð kw, a modification of peorð
31. kk)
32. stan "stone" st
33. ȝ)

Of these four additional letters, only the cweorð rune fails to appear epigraphically. The stan shape is found on the locations.

Cotton Domitian A.ix reaches thus a total of 33 letters, according to the transliteration introduced above arranged in the order

f u þ o r c ȝ w h n i j eo p x s t b e m l ŋ d œ a æ y ea io cw k st g

In the manuscript, the runes are arranged in three rows, glossed with Latin equivalents below (in the third row above) and with their names above (in the third row below). The manuscript has traces of corrections by a 16th-century hand, inverting the position of m and d. Eolh is mistakenly labelled as sigel, and in place of sigel, there is a kaun like letter , corrected to proper sigel above it. Eoh is mis-labelled as eþel. Apart from ing and ear, all rune names are due to the later scribe, identified as Robert Talbot (died 1558).

feoh ur þorn os rað cen gifu wen hegel neað inc geu{a}r sigel peorð ᛋ sig
f u ð o r c g uu h n i ge eo p x s
tir berc eþel deg lagu mann ᛙ pro ac ælc yr
t b e m{d} l ing ð{m} œ a æ y ear
ior cweorð calc stan ear

Another futhorc row is found in Cotton Galba A.ii.

The 9th-century Codex Sangallensis 878 (attributed to Walahfrid Strabo) records an abecedarium anguliscum in three lines. The first two lines list the standard 29 runes, i.e. the 24 derived from Elder Futhark, and the five standard additional ones (á, æ, ý, io, ea). The listing order of the final two of the "elder" 24 runes is dæg, éðel. A peculiarity is the "asterisk" shape of eolh. The third line lists gar and kalc(?) before a doodling repetition of other runes.

Inscription corpus

The Old English and Old Frisian Runic Inscriptions database project at the Katholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany aims at collecting the genuine corpus of Old English inscriptions containing more than two runes in its paper edition, while the electronic edition aims at including both genuine and doubtful inscriptions down to single-rune inscriptions.

The corpus of the paper edition encompasses about one hundred objects (including stone slabs, stone crosses, bones, rings, brooches, weapons, urns, a writing tablet, tweezers, a sun-dial, comb, bracteates, caskets, a font, dishes, and graffiti). The database includes, in addition, 16 inscriptions containing a single rune, several runic coins, and 8 cases of dubious runic characters (runelike signs, possible Latin characters, weathered characters). Comprising fewer than 200 inscriptions, the corpus is slightly larger than that of Continental Elder Futhark (about 80 inscriptions, c. 400–700), but slightly smaller than that of the Scandinavian Elder Futhark (about 260 inscriptions, c. 200–800).

Runic finds in England cluster along the east coast with a few finds scattered further inland in Southern England. Frisian finds cluster in West Frisia. Looijenga (1997) lists 23 English (including two 7th-century Christian inscriptions) and 21 Frisian inscriptions predating the 9th century.


Currently known Anglo-Saxon runic inscriptions include:


  • Ferwerd combcase, 6th century; me uræ
  • Amay comb, c. 600; eda
  • Oostyn comb, 8th century; aib ka[m]bu / deda habuku (with a triple-barred h)
  • Toornwerd comb, 8th century; kabu
  • Skanomody solidus, 575–610; skanomodu
  • Harlingen solidus, 575–625, hada (two ac runes, double-barred h)
  • Schweindorf solidus, 575–625, wela[n]du "Weyland" (or þeladu; running right to left)
  • Folkestone tremissis, c. 650; æniwulufu
  • Midlum sceat, c. 750; æpa
  • Rasquert swordhandle (whalebone handle of a symbolic sword), late 8th century; ekumæditoka, perhaps "I, Oka, not mad" (compare ek unwodz from the Danish corpus)
  • Arum sword, a yew-wood miniature sword, late 8th century; edæboda
  • Westeremden A, a yew weaving-slay; adujislume[þ]jisuhidu
  • Westeremden B, a yew-stick, 8th century; oph?nmuji?adaamluþ / :wimœ?ahþu?? / iwio?u?du?ale
  • Britsum yew-stick; þkniaberetdud / ]n:bsrsdnu; the k has Younger Futhark shape and probably represents a vowel.
  • Hantum whalebone plate; [.]:aha:k[; the reverse side is inscribed with Roman ABA.
  • Bernsterburen whalebone staff, c. 800; tuda æwudu kius þu tuda
  • Hamwick horse knucklebone, dated to between 650 and 1025; katæ (categorised as Frisian on linguistic grounds, from *kautōn "knucklebone")
  • Wijnaldum B gold pendant, c. 600; hiwi
  • Kantens combcase, early 5th century; li
  • Hoogebeintum comb, c. 700; […]nlu / ded
  • Wijnaldum A antler piece; zwfuwizw[…]


  • Ash Gilton (Kent) gilt silver sword pommel, 6th century; […]emsigimer[…][2]
  • Chessel Down I (Isle of Wight), 6th century; […]bwseeekkkaaa
  • Chessel Down II (Isle of Wight) silver plate (attached to the scabbard mouthpiece of a ring-sword), early 6th century; æko:?ori
  • Boarley (Kent) copper disc-brooch, c. 600; ærsil
  • Harford (Norfolk) brooch, c. 650; luda:gibœtæsigilæ "Luda repaired the brooch"
  • West Heslerton (North Yorkshire) copper cruciform brooch, early 6th century; neim
  • Loveden Hill (Lincolnshire) urn; 5th to 6th century; reading uncertain, maybe sïþæbæd þiuw hlaw "the grave of Siþæbæd the maid"
  • Spong Hill (Norfolk), three cremation urns, 5th century; decorated with identical runic stamps, reading alu (in Spiegelrunen).
  • Kent II coins (some 30 items), 7th century; reading pada
  • Kent III, IV silver sceattas, c. 600; reading æpa and epa
  • Suffolk gold shillings (three items), c. 660; stamped with desaiona
  • Caistor-by-Norwich astragalus, 5th century; possibly a Scandinavian import, in Elder Futhark transliteration reading raïhan "roe"
  • Watchfield (Oxfordshire) copper fittings, 6th century; Elder Futhark reading hariboki:wusa (with a probably already fronted to æ)
  • Wakerley (Northamptonshire) copper brooch, 6th century; buhui
  • Dover (Kent) brooch, c. 600; þd bli / bkk
  • Upper Thames Valley gold coins (four items), 620s; benu:tigoii; benu:+:tidi
  • Willoughby-on-the-Wolds (Nottinghamshire) copper bowl, c. 600; a
  • Cleatham (South Humbershire) copper bowl, c. 600; […]edih
  • Sandwich/Richborough (Kent) stone, 650 or earlier; […]ahabu[…]i, perhaps *ræhæbul "stag"
  • Whitby I (Yorkshire) jet spindle whorl; ueu
  • Selsey (West Sussex) gold plates, 6th to 8th centuries; brnrn / anmu
  • St. Cuthbert's coffin (Durham), dated to 698
  • Whitby II (Yorkshire) bone comb, 7th century; [dæ]us mæus godaluwalu dohelipæ cy[ i.e. deus meus, god aluwaldo, helpæ Cy… "my god, almighty god, help Cy…" (Cynewulf or a similar personal name; compare also names of God in Old English poetry.)
  • the Franks casket; 7th century
  • zoomorphic silver-gilt knife mount, discovered in the River Thames near Westminster Bridge (late 8th century)[3][4]
  • the Ruthwell Cross; 8th century, the inscription may be partly a modern reconstruction
  • the Brandon antler piece, wohs wildum deoræ an "[this] grew on a wild animal"; 9th century.[5]
  • Kingmoor Ring
  • the Seax of Beagnoth; 9th century (also known as the Thames scramasax); the only complete alphabet

Related manuscript texts


See also


  • .
  • .
  • .
  • J. H. Looijenga, Runes around the North Sea and on the Continent AD 150–700, dissertation, Groningen University (1997).
  • Odenstedt, Bengt, On the Origin and Early History of the Runic Script, Uppsala (1990), ISBN 91-85352-20-9; chapter 20: 'The position of continental and Anglo-Frisian runic forms in the history of the older futhark '
  • Frisian runes and neighbouring traditions, Amsterdamer Beiträge zur älteren Germanistik 45 (1996).
  • H. Marquardt, Die Runeninschriften der Britischen Inseln (Bibliographie der Runeninschriften nach Fundorten, Bd. I), Abhandlungen der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Göttingen, Phil.-hist. Klasse, dritte Folge, Nr. 48, Göttingen 1961, pp. 10–16.

External links

  • Anglo-Saxon Runic Texts at Georgetown Univ
  • Nytt om runer
  • Early Runic Inscriptions in England
  • Futhorc: Anglo-Saxon Runes
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.