World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Helena Blavatsky

Helena Blavatsky
Blavatsky in 1877
Born Yelena Petrovna von Hahn
12 August [O.S. 31 July] 1831
Yekaterinoslav, Russian Empire
Died 8 May 1891(1891-05-08) (aged 59)
London, United Kingdom
Cause of death Influenza
Era 19th-century philosophy
Parent(s) Pyotr Alexeyevich von Hahn
Yelena Andreyevna von Hahn

Helena Petrovna Blavatsky (Russian: Еле́на Петро́вна Блава́тская, Yelena Petrovna Blavatskaya; 12 August [O.S. 31 July] 1831 – 8 May 1891) was an occultist, spirit medium, and author who co-founded the Theosophical Society in 1875. She gained an international following as the leading theoretician of Theosophy, the esoteric movement that the Society promoted.

Born into an aristocratic Russian-German family[1] in Yekaterinoslav, Blavatsky traveled widely around the Russian Empire as a child. Largely self-educated, she developed an interest in Western esotericism during her teenage years. According to her later claims, in 1849 she embarked on a series of world travels, visiting Europe, the Americas, and India. She alleged that during this period she encountered a group of spiritual adepts, the "Masters of the Ancient Wisdom", who sent her to Shigatse, Tibet, where they trained her to develop her own psychic powers. Both contemporary critics and later biographers have argued that some or all of these foreign visits were fictitious, and that she spent this period in Europe. By the early 1870s, Blavatsky was involved in the Spiritualist movement; although defending the genuine existence of Spiritualist phenomena, she argued against the mainstream Spiritualist idea that the entities contacted were the spirits of the dead. Relocating to the United States in 1873, she befriended Henry Steel Olcott and rose to public attention as a spirit medium, attention that included public accusations of fraudulence.

In New York City, Blavatsky co-founded the Theosophical Society with Olcott and William Quan Judge in September 1875. In 1877 she published Isis Unveiled, a book outlining her Theosophical world-view. Associating it closely with the esoteric doctrines of Hermeticism and Neoplatonism, Blavatsky described Theosophy as "the synthesis of science, religion and philosophy", proclaiming that it was reviving an "Ancient Wisdom" which underlay all the world's religions. In 1880 she and Olcott moved to India, where the Society was allied to Dayananda Saraswati's Arya Samaj, a Hindu reform movement. That same year, while in Ceylon she and Olcott became the first Westerners to officially convert to Buddhism. Although opposed by the British administration, Theosophy spread rapidly in India, although experienced internal problems after Blavatsky was accused of producing fraudulent paranormal phenomena in the Coulomb Affair. Amid ailing health, in 1885 she returned to Europe, eventually settling in London, where she established the Blavatsky Lodge. Here she published The Secret Doctrine, a commentary on what she claimed were ancient Tibetan manuscripts, as well as two further books, The Key to Theosophy and The Voice of the Silence. She died of influenza in the home of her disciple and successor, Annie Besant.

Blavatsky was a controversial figure during her lifetime, championed by supporters as an enlightened guru and derided as a fraudulent charlatan by critics. Her Theosophical doctrines influenced the spread of Hindu and Buddhist ideas in the West as well as the development of Western esoteric currents like Ariosophy, Anthroposophy, and the New Age Movement.


  • Biography 1
    • Childhood: 1831–49 1.1
    • World travels: 1849–69 1.2
    • Embracing Spiritualism and establishing Theosophy: 1870–78 1.3
    • India: 1879–85 1.4
    • Final years in Europe: 1885–91 1.5
  • Personal life 2
  • Blavatsky's doctrines 3
    • Theosophy, the Masters, and the "Ancient Wisdom" 3.1
    • Theology, cosmogony, and the place of humanity 3.2
  • Reception 4
  • Influence 5
    • Theosophical movement 5.1
    • Western esotericism 5.2
    • South Asian religion and politics 5.3
    • Art, music and literature 5.4
    • Racial beliefs 5.5
  • Works 6
    • Translations 6.1
  • See also 7
  • Notes 8
  • References 9
    • Sources 9.1
  • Bibliography 10
  • External links 11


Developing a reliable account of Blavatsky's life has proved difficult for biographers because in later life she deliberately provided contradictory accounts and falsifications about her own past.[2] Further, very few of her own writings authored prior to 1873 survive, meaning that biographers must rely heavily on these unreliable later accounts.[3] The accounts of her early life provided by her family members have also been considered dubious by biographers.[4]

Childhood: 1831–49

Yekaterinoslav in the early 19th century

Blavatsky was born as Helena Petrovna von Hahn in the Ukrainian town of Yekaterinoslav, then part of the Russian Empire.[5] Her birth date was 12 August 1831, although according to the Julian calendar used in 19th century Russia it was 31 July, at 1.42 a.m.[6] She was baptized into the Russian Orthodox Church immediately after.[7] At the time of Blavatsky's birth, Yekaterinoslav was undergoing a cholera epidemic, and her mother contracted the disease shortly after childbirth; both mother and child survived the epidemic, although neither had been expected to.[8]

Born into an aristocratic family,[9] her mother was Helena Andreyevna von Hahn (Russian: Елена Андреевна Ган, 1814–1842; née Fadeyeva), a self-educated 17-year-old who herself had been the daughter of Princess Yelena Pavlovna Dolgorukova, a similarly self-educated aristocrat.[10] Blavatsky's father was Pyotr Alexeyevich von Hahn (Russian: Пётр Алексеевич Ган, 1798–1873), a descendant of the German von Hahn aristocratic family, who served as a captain in the Russian Royal Horse Artillery, and would later rise to the rank of colonel.[11] Pyotr had not been present at his daughter's birth, having been in Poland fighting to suppress the November Uprising against Russian rule, and first saw her when she was six months old.[12] As well as her Russian and German ancestry, Blavatsky could also claim French heritage, for a great-great grandfather had been a French Huguenot nobleman who had fled to Russia to escape persecution, there serving in the court of Catherine the Great.[13]

As a result of Pyotr's career, the family frequently moved to different parts of the Empire, accompanied by their servants,[14] a mobile childhood that may have influenced her largely nomadic lifestyle in later life.[15] A year after Pyotr's arrival in Yekaterinoslav, the family moved to the nearby army town of Romankovo.[16] When Blavatsky was two years old, her younger brother, Sasha, died in another army town when no medical help could be found.[17] In 1835, mother and daughter moved to Odessa, where Blavatsky's maternal grandfather Andrei Fadeyev, a civil administrator for the imperial authorities, had recently been posted. It was in this city that Blavatsky's sister Vera Petrovna was born.[17]

A painting of Blavatsky and her mother, titled "Two Helens (Helena Hahn and Helena Blavatsky)" 1844–1845

After a return to rural Ukraine, Pyotr was posted to

  • Helena Petrovna Blavatsky at DMOZ
  • The Blavatsky Study Center / Blavatsky Archives
  • Works by Helena Petrovna Blavatsky at Project Gutenberg
  • Works by or about Helena Blavatsky at Internet Archive
  • Works by Helena Blavatsky at LibriVox (public domain audiobooks)
  • A collection of letters to and from Helena Blavatsky are in the Andover-Harvard Theological Library at Harvard Divinity School in Cambridge, Massachusetts.
  • Early Theosophical Publications Online
  • Helena Petrovna Blavatsky [1] from the Encyclopædia Britannica, 1910 edition, online
  • An extensive online bibliography, dating from 1908 to 2001, with section for "Internet Resources",[2] annexed to The theosophical movement of the nineteenth century doctoral dissertation of Arnold Kalnitsky.[3]
External video
The Life of H. P. Blavatsky

External links

  • Please note other editions vary. Reprinted without original diacritical marks in
  • Please note other editions vary. Reprinted without original diacritical marks in
  • Reprinted in
  • Please note other editions vary. Reprinted without original diacritical marks in
  • Translation of
  • (Subscription or UK public library membership required.)
  • Translation of
  • Revision of
  • Also reprinted in
  • Transcribed in
  • Reprinted in
  • Transcribed in
  • Transcribed in
  • – almanac of the International Roerich Centre, № 2-3, 1994-1997



  1. ^ a b Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 2.
  2. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. xii–xiii.
  3. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 23.
  4. ^ Lachman 2012, p. xvi.
  5. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 8; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 2; Lachman 2012, p. 5.
  6. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 8–9; Santucci 2006, p. 177; Lachman 2012, p. 5; Сенкевич 2012, p. 34.
  7. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 9.
  8. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 5; Сенкевич 2012, p. 34.
  9. ^ Kuhn 1992, p. 44; Lachman 2012, p. 7; Сенкевич 2012, p. 17.
  10. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 7–8.
  11. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 5–6; Lachman 2012, p. 6; Сенкевич 2012, p. 19.
  12. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 10; Lachman 2012, p. 6; Сенкевич 2012, p. 43.
  13. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 3–4; Сенкевич 2012, p. 17.
  14. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 11; Santucci 2006, p. 177; Lachman 2012, p. 9.
  15. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 10.
  16. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 10; Lachman 2012, p. 10.
  17. ^ a b Cranston 1993, p. 11; Lachman 2012, p. 10.
  18. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 12–13; Lachman 2012, pp. 8, 10–11; Сенкевич 2012, p. 46, 48.
  19. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 11.
  20. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 13–14; Lachman 2012, pp. 11–12; Сенкевич 2012, p. 50, 56–57.
  21. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 15; Lachman 2012, p. 12.
  22. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 16–17; Lachman 2012, p. 12; Сенкевич 2012, p. 52.
  23. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 18; Lachman 2012, p. 13; Сенкевич 2012, p. 50.
  24. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 23; Lachman 2012, p. 13; Сенкевич 2012, p. 54.
  25. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 25; Lachman 2012, p. 13; Сенкевич 2012, p. 56.
  26. ^ Davenport-Hines 2011.
  27. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 14.
  28. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 15.
  29. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 16; Сенкевич 2012, p. 59.
  30. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 31, 35; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 2; Lachman 2012, p. 19; Сенкевич 2012, p. 116.
  31. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, pp. 2–3.
  32. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 17; Сенкевич 2012, p. 78.
  33. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 17; Сенкевич 2012, p. 79.
  34. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 43; Lachman 2012, p. 18.
  35. ^ a b Lachman 2012, p. 18.
  36. ^ a b Lachman 2012, p. 26.
  37. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 33; Lachman 2012, p. 26.
  38. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 35; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 3; Lachman 2012, pp. 27–29; Сенкевич 2012, p. 102.
  39. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 27.
  40. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 46.
  41. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 35–36; Washington 1993, p. 30; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 3; Lachman 2012, pp. 29–30; Сенкевич 2012, p. 124.
  42. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 36; Lachman 2012, p. 32; Сенкевич 2012, p. 126.
  43. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 36–37; Lachman 2012, p. 32.
  44. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 37–38; Washington 1993, p. 31; Lachman 2012, p. 33.
  45. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 33–34.
  46. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 42.
  47. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 3.
  48. ^ Washington 1993, pp. 30–31.
  49. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 36–37; Сенкевич 2012, p. 141.
  50. ^ David Conway, Magic Without Mirrors: The Making of a Magician Logios Publishing 2011. ISBN 978-1-4637-6172-1. pp. 123-124
  51. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 34.
  52. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 43; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, pp. 3–4; Lachman 2012, pp. 38–40.
  53. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 4; Santucci 2006, p. 177; Lachman 2012, pp. 41–42.
  54. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 42–43.
  55. ^ Kuhn 1992, p. 47; Cranston 1993, pp. 45–46; Kalnitsky 2003, p. 197; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 4; Lachman 2012, pp. 43–44; Сенкевич 2012, p. 163.
  56. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 48; Santucci 2006, p. 177; Lachman 2012, pp. 44–45.
  57. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 49; Santucci 2006, p. 177; Lachman 2012, p. 45.
  58. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 45–46.
  59. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 50; Santucci 2006, p. 177; Lachman 2012, p. 46.
  60. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 51–52; Lachman 2012, p. 46.
  61. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 52; Lachman 2012, p. 46.
  62. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 52–54; Santucci 2006, p. 177; Lachman 2012, p. 46.
  63. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 47.
  64. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 57–58; Santucci 2006, p. 177; Lachman 2012, pp. 60–61.
  65. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 61–62.
  66. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 60; Santucci 2006, p. 178; Lachman 2012, p. 47.
  67. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 63; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 4; Lachman 2012, p. 47.
  68. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 65–69; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 4; Lachman 2012, pp. 48–49.
  69. ^ Kuhn 1992, p. 75; Cranston 1993; Lachman 2012, p. 50.
  70. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 37–38, 50.
  71. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 4; Lachman 2012, pp. 50–51.
  72. ^ Kuhn 1992, p. 68.
  73. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 51.
  74. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 78–79; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 4; Lachman 2012, pp. 51–52.
  75. ^ a b c Fodor 2003.
  76. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 4; Lachman 2012, p. 63.
  77. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 92–83; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, pp. 4–5; Lachman 2012, pp. 64–65.
  78. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 100; Lachman 2012, pp. 68–69.
  79. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 71–72.
  80. ^ a b Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 5.
  81. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 97; Lachman 2012, p. 67.
  82. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 57.
  83. ^ Washington 1993, p. 33; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 5; Lachman 2012, pp. 53–54.
  84. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 82; Lachman 2012, p. 64.
  85. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 84; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 5.
  86. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 53.
  87. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 75.
  88. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 77–78, 81.
  89. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 78.
  90. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 105; Lachman 2012, p. 78.
  91. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 105–106; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 5; Lachman 2012, p. 79.
  92. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 106; Lachman 2012, pp. 80–81.
  93. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 82.
  94. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 83.
  95. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 105, 106; Lachman 2012, pp. 83–84.
  96. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 84.
  97. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 106–107; Lachman 2012, p. 84.
  98. ^ Cranston 1993, p. 107; Lachman 2012, p. 84.
  99. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 107–108; Washington 1993, p. 40; Lachman 2012, p. 84.
  100. ^ Washington 1993, p. 40; Lachman 2012, p. 87.
  101. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 88–89.
  102. ^ Washington 1993, p. 40.
  103. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 89–90.
  104. ^ Kuhn 1992, p. 58; Washington 1993, pp. 48–49; Lachman 2012, pp. 121–122.
  105. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 124–126; Washington 1993, p. 29; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 6; Lachman 2012, pp. 92–98.
  106. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. 126–127; Lachman 2012, pp. 98–99, 101.
  107. ^ Washington 1993, p. 43; Lachman 2012, p. 101.
  108. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 107–108.
  109. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 122.
  110. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 123.
  111. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 108–109.
  112. ^ Washington 1993, pp. 42–43; Lachman 2012, pp. 108–110.
  113. ^ Washington 1993, p. 495; Lachman 2012, p. 124.
  114. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 124, 126.
  115. ^ Washington 1993, pp. 44–45; Lachman 2012, pp. 143–144.
  116. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, pp. 10–11.
  117. ^ Washington 1993, p. 49; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 7; Lachman 2012, pp. 129–130.
  118. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 7; Lachman 2012, pp. 129–130.
  119. ^ Washington 1993, pp. 53–54; Goodrick-Clarke 2004; Lachman 2012, p. 7.
  120. ^ a b Lachman 2012, p. 132.
  121. ^ Washington 1993, p. 55; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 8; Lachman 2012, p. 133.
  122. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 137.
  123. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 135.
  124. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 7; Lachman 2012, pp. 130–131, 135–136.
  125. ^ Washington 1993, pp. 53–54; Lachman 2012, pp. 136–137.
  126. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 9.
  127. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 137, 140–143.
  128. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 8; Lachman 2012, pp. 137–138.
  129. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 8; Lachman 2012, p. 147.
  130. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 148.
  131. ^ a b Lachman 2012, p. 154.
  132. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 9; Lachman 2012, pp. 155, 157.
  133. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 156.
  134. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 159–160.
  135. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 9; Lachman 2012, pp. 150–151.
  136. ^ Washington 1993, p. 52.
  137. ^ Washington 1993, p. 52; Lachman 2012, p. 152.
  138. ^ Washington 1993, p. 57; Lachman 2012, p. 170.
  139. ^ a b Lachman 2012, p. 171.
  140. ^ Washington 1993, p. 57; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 11; Lachman 2012, p. 173.
  141. ^ Washington 1993, p. 58; Lachman 2012, pp. 176–179.
  142. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 180.
  143. ^ Washington 1993, p. 59; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 11; Lachman 2012, pp. 181–182.
  144. ^ Washington 1993, pp. 59–60; Lachman 2012, pp. 182–184.
  145. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 184.
  146. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, pp. 11–12.
  147. ^ Washington 1993, p. 60.
  148. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 186–187.
  149. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 187.
  150. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 188.
  151. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 188–189.
  152. ^ Washington 1993, p. 60; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 11; Lachman 2012, p. 189.
  153. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 189.
  154. ^ Washington 1993, p. 61; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 12; Lachman 2012, pp. 190–191.
  155. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 191.
  156. ^ Lori Pierce, "Origins of Buddhism in North America", in Encyclopedia of Women and Religion in North America, Rosemary Skinner Keller, Rosemary Radford Ruether, Marie Cantlon (eds.). Indiana University Press, 2006. p. 637
  157. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 12; Lachman 2012, pp. 193–194.
  158. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 194.
  159. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 189–190, 192–193.
  160. ^ Washington 1993, p. 79; Lachman 2012, pp. 194–195.
  161. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 12; Lachman 2012, pp. 197–200.
  162. ^ Kuhn 1992, ch. vi.
  163. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 201.
  164. ^ a b Lachman 2012, p. 202.
  165. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 203–204.
  166. ^ a b Harrison 1997.
  167. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 219.
  168. ^ Сенкевич 2012, p. 347.
  169. ^ a b Lachman 2012, p. 214.
  170. ^ Washington 1993, pp. 66–67; Lachman 2012, pp. 215–216.
  171. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 217.
  172. ^ Washington 1993, p. 66; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 13; Lachman 2012, pp. 217–218.
  173. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 218.
  174. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 220–221.
  175. ^ Сенкевич 2012, p. 404.
  176. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 221–222.
  177. ^ Сенкевич 2012, p. 397.
  178. ^ Tillett 1986, p. 131.
  179. ^ Washington 1993, pp. 76–77; Lachman 2012, pp. 222–223.
  180. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 224, 226–227.
  181. ^ Сенкевич 2012, p. 411.
  182. ^ Washington 1993, pp. 79–82; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 13; Lachman 2012, pp. 224–226; Сенкевич 2012, p. 412.
  183. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 228.
  184. ^ Tillett 1986, p. 142.
  185. ^ Washington 1993, p. 85; Lachman 2012, p. 231.
  186. ^ a b c Washington 1993, p. 68.
  187. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 14; Lachman 2012, p. 232.
  188. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 14; Lachman 2012, pp. 232–233.
  189. ^ Washington 1993, pp. 82–83; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 13; Lachman 2012, pp. 228–230, 236–237.
  190. ^ Washington 1993, p. 87; Lachman 2012, p. 235.
  191. ^ Washington 1993, p. 85.
  192. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 235–236.
  193. ^ Society for Psychical Research 1986.
  194. ^ Cranston 1993, pp. xvii–xviii; Washington 1993, p. 84; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 14; Lachman 2012, p. 238.
  195. ^ Johnson 1994, p. 3.
  196. ^ Washington 1993, p. 87; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 14; Lachman 2012, pp. 240–241.
  197. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 241.
  198. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 241–242.
  199. ^ Washington 1993, p. 91; Lachman 2012, p. 244.
  200. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 245.
  201. ^ Washington 1993, p. 90; Lachman 2012, p. 245.
  202. ^ Washington 1993, p. 91; Lachman 2012, pp. 246–247.
  203. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 258–259.
  204. ^ Washington 1993, p. 100; Lachman 2012, pp. 248–249.
  205. ^ Washington 1993, p. 90; Lachman 2012, pp. 245–246.
  206. ^ Washington 1993, p. 91; Lachman 2012, p. 246.
  207. ^ Washington 1993, p. 92; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 14; Lachman 2012, pp. 249–250.
  208. ^ Washington 1993, p. 92; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 14; Lachman 2012, p. 250.
  209. ^ Reigle 1983.
  210. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 257.
  211. ^ Washington 1993, pp. 92–93; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, pp. 16–18; Lachman 2012, p. 255–256.
  212. ^ Washington 1993, p. 93; Lachman 2012, pp. 157–258.
  213. ^ Washington 1993, p. 100; Lachman 2012, p. 259.
  214. ^ Washington 1993, p. 99; Lachman 2012, p. 265.
  215. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 265.
  216. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 260–261.
  217. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 261–262.
  218. ^ The Middle Way, August 1965, p. 90.
  219. ^ Santucci 2006, p. 184; Lachman 2012, p. 268.
  220. ^ Washington 1993, p. 100; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 17; Lachman 2012, p. 269.
  221. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 270.
  222. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 271.
  223. ^ a b Washington 1993, p. 41.
  224. ^ Washington 1993, p. 26.
  225. ^ a b Meade 1980, p. 7.
  226. ^ Washington 1993, p. 30.
  227. ^ a b Клейн 2011.
  228. ^ Сенкевич 2012, p. 403.
  229. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 31.
  230. ^ Washington 1993, p. 88.
  231. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 34–35.
  232. ^ Lachman 2012, p. ix.
  233. ^ Washington 1993, p. 43.
  234. ^ Washington 1993, p. 41; Lachman 2012, pp. 40–41.
  235. ^ a b Cranston 1993, p. xix.
  236. ^ Santucci 2006b, p. 1114; Lachman 2012, pp. 135–136.
  237. ^ a b c Bednarowski 1980, p. 221.
  238. ^ Santucci 2006b, p. 1114.
  239. ^ Hanegraaff 2013, p. 40.
  240. ^ a b c d Goodrick-Clarke 2008, p. 216.
  241. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2008, p. 217.
  242. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2008, p. 220.
  243. ^ Washington 1993, p. 69; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 11; Lachman 2012, p. 134.
  244. ^ Washington 1993, p. 69.
  245. ^ Blavatsky 1962, p. 1–4.
  246. ^ Blavatsky 1966 "Neo-Buddhism" pp. 478–511 [context at p. 341]. Groningen, Netherlands: Retrieved 2011-01-29.
  247. ^ Bevir 1994, p. 757.
  248. ^ a b Hutton 1999, p. 19.
  249. ^ a b Mead 1920.
  250. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2008, p. 212.
  251. ^ Bevir 1994, p. 759.
  252. ^ a b c Bevir 1994, p. 753.
  253. ^ a b c d Lachman 2012, p. 255.
  254. ^ Kuhn 1992, p. 199.
  255. ^ a b c d e f g h Lachman 2012, p. 256.
  256. ^ Kuhn 1992, p. 222.
  257. ^ Lachman 2012, pp. 255–256.
  258. ^ Kuhn 1992, p. 224.
  259. ^ Kuhn 1992, p. 225.
  260. ^ Kuhn 1992, p. 226.
  261. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2008, p. 223.
  262. ^ Blavatsky 1888. Volume II: Anthropogenesis. Phoenix, Arizona: United Lodge of Theosophists. 2005. Retrieved 2011-01-29. The entire volume constitutes a detailed description of the Theosophical doctrines of the evolution of Humankind, and related subjects. (Chakras references: pp. 465, 466, 483, 546).
  263. ^ Bevir 1994, p. 755.
  264. ^ a b Blavatsky 1962, sect. vi.
  265. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2008, p. 221.
  266. ^ Hanegraaff 2013, p. 135.
  267. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2008, p. 225.
  268. ^ Bevir 1994, p. 761.
  269. ^ Blavatsky 1877a.
  270. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2008, p. 224.
  271. ^ Ellwood 2005, p. 110.
  272. ^ Kalnitsky 2003, p. 178; Ellwood 2005, p. 110; Lachman 2012, p. ix,4.
  273. ^ Kalnitsky 2003, p. 178; Lachman 2012, p. 4.
  274. ^ Washington 1993, p. 31.
  275. ^ Washington 1993, pp. 45–46.
  276. ^ a b Guénon 2004, pp. 82–89.
  277. ^ Campbell 1980.
  278. ^ Sedgwick 2004, p. 44.
  279. ^ William Emmette Coleman, "The Sources of Madame Blavatsky's Writings", in A Modern Priestess of Isis by Vsevolod Sergyeevich Solovyoff, London, Longmans, Green, and Co., 1895, Appendix C, pp. 353-366.
  280. ^ Sedgwick 2004, p. 44; Campbell 1980, pp. 32–34.
  281. ^ Hower 1995.
  282. ^ Barker 1925, pp. 134–139, etc..
  283. ^ Oldmeadow 2004, p. 131.
  284. ^ Carroll 2003, p. 376.
  285. ^ Randi 2006.
  286. ^ Bevir 1994, p. 764.
  287. ^ Hutton 1999, p. 18.
  288. ^ Washington 1993, p. 45; Lachman 2012, p. xi.
  289. ^ Santucci 2006, p. 184.
  290. ^ Kalnitsky 2003, p. 180.
  291. ^ Сенкевич 2012, p. 427.
  292. ^ Kalnitsky 2003, p. 331.
  293. ^ Encyclopædia Britannica Eleventh Edition 1911, Blavatsky, Helena Petrovna
  294. ^ Cranston 1993, p. xxii.
  295. ^ a b Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 18.
  296. ^ Bednarowski 1980, p. 222.
  297. ^ Melton 1990, pp. xxv–xxvi.
  298. ^ Tillett 1986, pp. 942–947.
  299. ^ TIS 2009.
  300. ^ Lachman 2012, p. xi.
  301. ^ Gardell 2003, pp. 21–22; Lachman 2012, p. 251.
  302. ^
  303. ^ Newman 2005, p. 73.
  304. ^ Lachman 2012, p. 251.
  305. ^ Staudenmaier 2008, pp. 6–7.
  306. ^ Bevir 1994, p. 765.
  307. ^ Bevir 1994, p. 765; Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 18; Santucci 2006, p. 184.
  308. ^ New Age Encyclopedia 1990, pp. 458–461.
  309. ^ New Age Encyclopedia 1990, ix, –xxxviii.
  310. ^ Lewis, James R., and J. Gordon Melton, eds. (1994). Church Universal and Triumphant in Scholarly Perspective. Center for Academic Publication. pp. 1-2. ISBN 978-0-8191-9634-7.
  311. ^ a b c Meade 1980, p. 8.
  312. ^ Goodrick-Clarke 2004, p. 17.
  313. ^ MacMahan 2008.
  314. ^ Gombrich 1996, pp. 185–188.
  315. ^ Fields 1992, pp. 83–118.
  316. ^ Bevir 1994, p. 748.
  317. ^ Hutton 1999, p. 20.
  318. ^ Bevir 1994, p. 674.
  319. ^ Müller 1893a.
  320. ^ Müller 1902.
  321. ^ Bevir 1994, pp. 758–759.
  322. ^ Carter 1998.
  323. ^ Кранстон 1999, sect. 7/4.
  324. ^ Кранстон 1999, sect. 7/6.
  325. ^ Minderovic 2011.
  326. ^
  327. ^ Цит. по: Бандура А. И. А. Н. Скрябин и Е. П. Блаватская // 175 лет со дня рождения Е. П. Блаватской. Материалы Международной научно-общественной конференции. – Санкт-Петербургское отделение Международного Центра Рерихов, Санкт-Петербург, 2006 г. – С. 120 (А. И. Бандура – кандидат искусствоведения, председатель музыкально-философского общества имени А. Н. Скрябина, Москва)
  328. ^ Толстой 1955, p. 67.
  329. ^ Толстой 1935, p. 155.
  330. ^ Blavatsky 1889. "The Objects of the Society" pp. 39–41. Wheaton, Maryland: Theosophy Library Online. Retrieved 2011-01-12.
  331. ^
  332. ^ Blavatsky 1889 "What the Modern Theosophical Society is not" pp. 16–20 [context at p. 19. Emphasis in original]. Wheaton, Maryland: Theosophy Library Online. Retrieved 2011-01-12.


  1. ^ Australian scholar Brendan French wrote, "I have been asked by a number of Theosophists how I would feel if (somehow) it was able to be proved that the Masters never did exist. All I could say is that my respect for Blavatsky would not plummet, but soar." See also French 2000.
  2. ^ See
  3. ^ Theosophist Leadbeater claimed that at the time of the French Revolution Blavatsky was "in incarnation under the name of Père Joseph" and worked with "the Comte de S. Germain."
  4. ^ The "Chronology of the New Age Movement" in New Age Encyclopedia begins with the formation of the Theosophical Society in 1875.[309] See Lewis & Melton 1992, xi.
  5. ^ For Sinnett's response and Müller's rejoinder, see Sinnett 1893 and Müller 1893b.
  6. ^ For more about how Scriabin was influenced by Blavatsky, see


See also


Other works, not listed as a reference, include:


Regarding the concept of race as defined – in a comparatively more limited manner – by anthropology, sociology, and other disciplines, Blavatsky did not encourage superiority by any person or group, promoting the idea of the common origin and destiny of all humanity, and establishing the principle of universal brotherhood as the First Object of the Theosophical Society.[330] Austrian/German ultra-nationalist Guido von List and his followers such as Lanz von Liebenfels, later selectively mixed parts of Blavatsky's occult philosophy with nationalistic and fascist ideas; this system of thought became known as Ariosophy. Some researchers, tracing the links between Ariosophy and Theosophy, stated that the latter relies mostly on "intellectual expositions of racial evolution".[331] However, in The Key to Theosophy, Blavatsky had stated that "The Society is a philanthropic and scientific body for the propagation of the idea of brotherhood on practical instead of theoretical lines."[332]

Racial beliefs

Blavatsky presented her book The Voice of the Silence, The Seven gates, Two Paths to Leo Tolstoy. In his works, Tolstoy used the dicta from the theosophical journal Theosophischer Wegweiser.[328] In his diary, he wrote on 12 February 1903, "I am reading a beautiful theosophical journal and find many common with my understanding."[329]

Artists and authors who investigated Theosophy include Talbot Mundy, Charles Howard Hinton, Geoffrey Hodson, James Jones,[322] H. P. Lovecraft, Robert E. Howard, Clark Ashton Smith, Sun Ra, Lawren Harris and L. Frank Baum.[323] Composer Alexander Scriabin[324] was a Theosophist whose beliefs influenced his music, especially by providing a justification or rationale for his chromatic language. Scriabin devised a quartal synthetic chord, often called his mystic chord, and before his death Scriabin planned a multimedia work to be performed in the Himalayas that would bring about the armageddon; "a grandiose religious synthesis of all arts which would herald the birth of a new world."[325] This piece, Mysterium, was unfinished when he died in 1915. Leonid Sabaneyev, in his book Reminiscences about Scriabin (1925), wrote that The Secret Doctrine and journals "Bulletin of theosophy" constantly were on Scriabin's work table.[326] Scriabin reread The Secret Doctrine very carefully and marked the most important places by a pencil.[327][6] Artists reported to be Theosophists were Wassily Kandinsky and Piet Mondrian.

The book The Voice of the Silence presented by Blavatsky to Leo Tolstoy

Art, music and literature

Blavatsky "both incorporated a number of the doctrines of eastern religions into her occultism, and interpreted eastern religions in the light of her occultism", in doing so extending a view of the "mystical East" that had already been popularized through Romanticist poetry.[318] Max Müller scathingly criticized Blavatsky's Esoteric Buddhism. Whilst he was willing to give her credit for good motives, at least at the beginning of her career, in his view she ceased to be truthful both to herself and to others with her later "hysterical writings and performances". There is a nothing esoteric or secretive in Buddhism, he wrote, in fact the very opposite. "Whatever was esoteric was ipso facto not Buddha's teaching; whatever was Buddha's teaching was ipso facto not esoteric".[319][5] Blavatsky, it seemed to Müller, "was either deceived by others or carried away by her own imaginations."[320] Blavatsky responded to those academic specialists in Indian religion who accused her of misrepresenting it by claiming that they only understood the exoteric nature of Hinduism and Buddhism and not the inner esoteric secrets of these faiths, which she traced back to the ancient Vedas.[321]

Meade stated that "more than any other single individual", Blavatsky was responsible for bringing a knowledge of Eastern religion and philosophy to the West.[311] Blavatsky believed that Indian religion offered answers to problems then facing Westerners; in particular, she believed that Indian religion contained an evolutionary cosmology which complemented Darwinian evolutionary theory, and that the Indian doctrine of reincarnation met many of the moral qualms surrounding vicarious atonement and eternal damnation that preoccupied 19th century Westerners.[316] In doing so, Meade believed that Blavatsky paved the way for the emergence of later movements such as the International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Transcendental Meditation movement, Zen Buddhism, and yoga in the West.[311] Hutton believed that the two greatest achievements of Blavatsky's movement were in popularizing belief in reincarnation and in a singular divine world soul within the West.[317]

Hutton suggested that Blavatsky had a greater impact in Asia than in the Western world.[248] Blavatsky has been cited as having inspired Hindus to respect their own religious roots.[311] The Theosophical Society influenced the growth of Indian national consciousness, with prominent figures in the Indian independence movement, among them Mohandas Gandhi and Jawaharlal Nehru, being inspired by Theosophy to study their own national heritage.[312] The Theosophical Society had a major influence on Buddhist modernism and Hindu reform movements,[313] while Blavatsky and Olcott took part in Anagarika Dharmapala's revival of Theravada Buddhism in Ceylon.[314][315]

South Asian religion and politics

Blavatsky's Theosophy has been cited as an influence on the Agni Yoga, and a group of religions based on Theosophy called the Ascended Master Teachings: the "I AM" Activity, The Bridge to Freedom, Universal Medicine and The Summit Lighthouse, which evolved into the Church Universal and Triumphant.[310]

Blavatsky's Theosophy has been described as representing "a major factor in the modern revival" of Western esotericism.[1] Lachman claimed that "practically all modern occultism and esotericism" can trace its origins back to her influence.[300] Blavatsky's published Theosophical ideas, particularly those regarding Root Races, have been cited as an influence on Ariosophy, the esoteric movement established in late 19th and early 20th century Germany and Austria by Guido von List and Jörg Lanz von Liebenfels.[301][302] Hannah Newman stated that via Ariosophy, Blavatsky's Theosophical ideas "contributed to Nazi ideology".[303] Nevertheless, Lachman has asserted that Blavatsky should not be held accountable to any of the antisemitic and racist ideas that the Ariosophists promoted, commenting that were she alive to witness the development of Ariosophy she probably would have denounced its ideas regarding race.[304] Blavatsky's Theosophical ideas regarding Root Races have also been cited as an influence on Anthroposophy, the esoteric movement developed by Rudolf Steiner in early 20th century Germany,[305] with Steiner's Anthroposophical Society being termed a "historical offshoot" of the Theosophical Society.[306]

Western esotericism

Contemporaries of Blavatsky, as well as later theosophists, contributed to the development of this school of theosophical thought, producing works that at times sought to elucidate the ideas she presented (see Gottfried de Purucker), and at times to expand upon them. Since its inception, and through doctrinal assimilation or divergence, Theosophy has also given rise to or influenced the development of other mystical, philosophical, and religious movements.[297] During the 1920s the Theosophical Society Adyar had around 7,000 members in the U.S.[298] There also was a substantial following in Asia. According to a Theosophical source, the Indian section in 2008 was said to have around 13,000 members while in the US the 2008 membership was reported at around 3,900.[299]

Blavatsky's Theosophy redirected the interest in Spiritualism toward a more coherent doctrine that included cosmology with theory of evolution in an understanding of humanity's spiritual development.[295] Further, it took the traditional sources of Western esotericism and globalized them by restating many of their ideas in terminology adopted from Asian religions.[295] Blavatsky's Theosophy was able to appeal to women by de-emphasizing the importance of gender and allowing them to take on spiritual leadership equal to that of men, thus allowing them a greater role than that permitted in traditional Christianity.[296]

[294] Her writings have been translated and published in a wide range of European and Asian languages.[293] According to Kalnitsky, the Theosophical movement of the nineteenth century was created and defined in the main through the astuteness and conceptual ideas provided by H.P. Blavatsky. He stated that "without her

Theosophical movement


Psychologist Nandor Fodor stated, "Whatever result psycho-analysts may arrive at in the study of her [Blavatsky's] complex character, it must be admitted that she was a remarkable woman and that she indeed possessed psychic powers which, however, fell far short of the miraculous feats she constantly aimed at."[75] A number of authors, primarily Scholars, have suggested that Blavatsky sometimes spoke and/or wrote out of altered states of consciousness.[75][290][291] G. R. S. Mead wrote about Blavatsky, "I know no one who detested, more than she did, any attempt to hero-worship herself – she positively physically shuddered at any expression of reverence to herself – as a spiritual teacher; I have heard her cry out in genuine alarm at an attempt to kneel to her made by an enthusiastic admirer."[249] Leo Klejn wrote about Blavatsky, "Indefatigability and energy of this woman were surprising. She had a revolutionary's merits."[227][3]

According to religious studies scholar Mark Bevir, Blavatsky "adapted the occult tradition to meet the challenge of Victorian science and morality".[286] Historian Ronald Hutton described Blavatsky as "one of the century's truly international figures", whose ideas gained "considerable popularity".[287] Various biographers have noted that by the late 20th and early 21st century, Blavatsky was little known among the general public.[288] In 2006, scholar James A. Santucci nevertheless noted that she was "as visible today as any modern trend-setting guru, and she will most likely remain the most memorable and innovative esotericist of the 19th century."[289]

Various authors have questioned the authenticity of her writings, citing evidence that they are heavily plagiarized from older esoteric sources,[276][277] [278][279][2] pronouncing her claim of the existence of masters of wisdom to be utterly false, and accusing her of being a charlatan, a false medium, and a falsifier of letters.[280][281] Most of the accusations remain undocumented.[282][166] The traditionalist René Guénon wrote a detailed critique of Theosophy, in which he claimed that Blavatsky had acquired all her knowledge naturally from other books, not from any supernatural masters.[276] Carl Jung virulently criticized her work. Agehananda Bharati dismissed it as "a melee of horrendous hogwash and of fertile inventions of inane esoterica". Mircea Eliade suggested that her theory of spiritual evolution contradicts the entire spirit of Eastern tradition, which is "precisely an anti-evolutionist conception of the spiritual life" [283] After her death, Blavatsky continued to be accused of fraudulently producing paranormal phenomena by skeptics such as Robert Todd Carroll,[284] and James Randi.[285]

Blavatsky was a highly controversial figure,[272] and attitudes toward her were typically polarized into extreme camps, one uncritically idolizing her as a holy guru and the other expressing complete disdain for her as a charlatan.[273] Washington suggested that Blavatsky generated such controversy because she courted publicity without knowing how to manage it.[274] Blavatsky's devotees often attribute the criticism that she sustained to the fact that she attacked the vested interests of both the Christian establishment and the material scientific skeptics, thus believing that "the slanders on her reputation are the signs of grace: the stigmata that all great martyrs must bear."[275]

"[Blavatsky was] one of the most significant, controversial, and prolific of modern esotericists... It is more than evident that, whatever one thinks of the more flamboyant aspects of this remarkable and many-sided woman, she possessed a keen intellect and a wide-ranging vision of what occultism could be in the modern world."

— Religious studies scholar Robert Ellwood, 2005.[271]


Goodrick-Clarke noted that Blavatsky's cosmology contained all four of the prime characteristics of Western esotericism that had been identified by the scholar Antoine Faivre: "(a) correspondences between all parts of the universe, the macrocosm and microcosm; (b) living nature as a complex, plural, hierarchical, and animate whole; (c) imagination and mediations in the form of intermediary spirits, symbols, and mandalas; and (d) the experience of transmutation of the soul through purification and ascent."[270]

Blavatsky taught that humans composed of three separate parts: a divine spark, an astral fluid body, and the physical body.[263] Later Blavatsky proclaimed the septenary of Man and Universe.[264] According to Blavatsky, man is composed of seven parts: Atma, Buddhi, Manas, Kama rupa, Linga sharira, Prana, and Sthula sharira.[264] In Isis Unveiled, Blavatsky denied that humans would be reincarnated back on the Earth after physical death.[265] However, by the time that she had authored The Secret Doctrine, she had changed her opinion on this issue, likely influenced by her time in India.[266] Here, she stated that the law of reincarnation was governed by karma, with humanity's final purpose being the emancipation of the soul from the cycle of death and rebirth.[267] She believed that knowledge of karma would ensure that human beings lived according to moral principles, arguing that it provided a far greater basis for moral action that Christian doctrine.[268] Blavatsky wrote, in Isis Unveiled, that Spiritualism "alone offers a possible last refuge of compromise between" the "revealed religions and materialistic philosophies." While she acknowledged that fanatic believers "remained blind to its imperfections", she wrote that such a fact was "no excuse to doubt its reality" and asserted that Spiritualist fanaticism was "itself a proof of the genuineness and possibility of their phenomena."[269]

The fifth Root Race to emerge was the Aryans, and was found across the world at the time she was writing.[255][260] She believed that the fifth Race would come to be replaced by the sixth, which would be heralded by the arrival of Maitreya, a figure from Mahayana Buddhist mythology.[261] She further believed that humanity would eventually develop into the final, seventh Root Race.[255][262] Lachman suggested that by reading Blavatsky's cosmogonical claims as a literal account of history, "we may be doing it a disservice."[255] He instead suggested that it could be read as Blavatsky's attempt to formulate "a new myth for the modern age, or as a huge, fantastic science fiction story".[255]

Blavatsky advocated the idea of "Root Races", each of which was divided into seven Sub-Races.[255] In Blavatsky's cosmogony, the first Root Race were created from pure spirit, and lived on a continent known as the "Imperishable Sacred Land".[253][256] The second Root Race, known as the Hyperboreans, were also formed from pure spirit, and lived on a land near to the North Pole, which then had a mild climate.[253] The third lived on the continent of Lemuria, which Blavatsky alleged survives today as Australia and Rapa Nui.[257][258] Blavatsky alleged that during the fourth Round of the Earth, higher beings descended to the planet, with the beginnings of human physical bodies developing, and the sexes separating.[255] At this point, the fourth Root Race appeared, living on the continent of Atlantis; they had physical bodies but also psychic powers and advanced technology.[259] She claimed that some Atlanteans were giants, and built such ancient monuments as Stonehenge in southern England, and that they also mated with "she-animals", resulting in the creation of gorillas and chimpanzees.[255] The Atlanteans were decadent and abused their power and knowledge, so Atlantis sunk into the sea, although various Atlanteans escaped, and created new societies in Egypt and the Americas.[255]

After spending time in India, Blavatsky adopted a belief in reincarnation (as shown here in Hindu art)

In The Secret Doctrine, Blavatsky articulated the belief that in the beginning of time there was absolute nothingness. This primordial essence then separated itself into seven Rays, which were also intelligent beings known as the Dhyan Chohans; these Seven Rays then created the universe using an energy called Fohat.[253][254] The Earth was created and underwent seven Rounds, in each of which different living beings were created.[253]

Blavatsky expounded what has been described as a "monotheistic, immanentist, and mystical cosmology."[251] Blavatsky emphasized the idea of an impersonal divinity, referring to the Theosophical God as a "universal Divine Principle, the root of All, from which all proceeds, and within which all shall be absorbed at the end of the great cycle of being."[237] She was dismissive of the Christian idea of God then dominant in the West, describing it as "a bundle of contradictions and a logical impossibility."[237] She stated that the universe emanated from this Divine Principle, with each particle of matter being infused with a spark of the divine.[252] Lower Orders emanated from higher ones, before becoming increasingly dense and being absorbed back into the Divine Principle.[252] This cosmology exhibited commonalities with the scientific discoveries of geology and biological evolution, both of which had been revealed by scientific inquiry during the 19th century.[252]

"Blavatsky's writings garnered the materials of Neoplatonism, Renaissance magic, Kabbalah, and Freemasonry, together with ancient Egyptian and Greco-Roman mythology and religion, joined by Eastern doctrines taken from Buddhism and Advaita Vedanta to present the idea of an ancient wisdom handed down from prehistoric times."

— Historian Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, 2008.[250]

Theology, cosmogony, and the place of humanity

G. R. S. Mead proclaimed, "Two things in all the chaos of her [Blavatsky's] cosmos stood firm in every mood – that her Teachers existed[1] and that she had not cheated."[249]

In The Key to Theosophy, she rejected the idea of Theosophy as a religion, instead referring to it as "Divine Knowledge or Science".[245] She also proclaimed religious tolerance and inclusiveness stating, "Theosophists, collectively, respect the Bible as much as they do the sacred scriptures of other people, finding in it the same eternal truths as in the Vedas, the Zend-Avesta, the Tripitakas, etc."[246] While in Ceylon, Blavatsky officially converted to Theravada Buddhism in the presence of Buddhist clergy, however Lachman stated that her Buddhism was "highly eccentric and had little to do with the Buddhism of scholars like [Max] Müller or that of your average Buddhist."[164] Blavatsky argued that The Buddha had sought to return to the teachings of the Vedas, and that Buddhism therefore represented a more accurate survival of ancient Brahmanism than modern Hinduism.[247] Although critical of Catholicism and Protestantism, and opposing their growth in Asia, throughout her life she remained highly sympathetic to the Russian Orthodox Church, commenting that "with the faith of the Russian Church I will not even compare Buddhism".[248]

Washington believed that the purpose of these three precepts was to lead to the "discovery of the powers latent in man through the occult study of science, philosophy and religion [which] shall be the preferred route to the social harmony and equality which will prefigure – and perhaps become – the divine harmony."[244]

  1. To form a nucleus of the Universal Brotherhood of Humanity, without distinction of race, creed, sex, caste, or colour.
  2. To encourage the study of Comparative Religion, Philosophy, and Science.
  3. To investigate the unexplained laws of Nature and the powers latent in man.[243]

According to Goodrick-Clarke, the Theosophical Society "disseminated an elaborate philosophical edifice involving a cosmogony, the macrocosm of the universe, spiritual hierarchies, and intermediary beings, the latter having correspondences with a hierarchical conception of the microcosm of man."[242] Officially, the Society based itself upon the following three objectives:

Fundamentally, the underlying concept behind Blavatsky's Theosophy was that there was an "ancient wisdom religion" which had once been found across the world, and which was known to various ancient figures, such as the Greek philosopher Plato and the ancient Hindu sages.[240] Blavatsky connected this ancient wisdom religion to Hermetic philosophy, a worldview in which everything in the universe is identified as an emanation from a Godhead.[240] Blavatsky believed that all of the world's religions developed from this original global faith.[240] Blavatsky understood her Theosophy to be the heir to the Neoplatonist philosophers of Late Antiquity, who had also embraced Hermetic philosophy.[241] She believed that the Theosophical movement's revival of the "ancient wisdom religion" would lead to it spreading across the world, eclipsing the established world religions.[240] Thus, in bringing these Theosophical ideas to humanity, Blavatsky viewed herself as a messianic figure.[225]

Blavatsky was the leading theoretician of the Theosophical Society,[236] responsible for establishing its "doctrinal basis".[237] The ideas expounded in her published texts provide the basis from which the Society and wider Theosophical movement emerged.[238] Blavatsky's Theosophical ideas were a form of occultism, a current of thought within Western esotericism which emphasized the idea of an ancient and superior wisdom that had been found in pre-Christian societies but which was absent from the doctrines of established Christianity.[239] Blavatsky stated that the Theosophical teachings were passed on to her by adepts, who lived in various parts of the world.[235]

The logo for the Theosophical Society brought together various ancient symbols

Theosophy, the Masters, and the "Ancient Wisdom"

Blavatsky's doctrines

Blavatsky preferred to be known by the acronym "HPB",[232] a sobriquet applied to her by many of her friends which was first developed by Olcott.[233] In later life, she was known for wearing loose robes, and wore many rings on her fingers.[223] She was a heavy cigarette smoker throughout her life.[234] She lived simply and refused to accept monetary payment in return for disseminating her teachings.[235]

Blavatsky's sexuality has been an issue of dispute; many biographers have believed that she remained celibate throughout her life,[229] with Washington believing that she "hated sex with her own sort of passion".[230] Some have suggested that she may have been a lesbian or transvestite, due to early accounts in which she traveled while dressed in masculine attire.[231]

Biographer Peter Washington described Blavatsky as "a short, stout, forceful woman, with strong arms, several chins, unruly hair, a determined mouth, and large, liquid, slightly bulging eyes."[224] Biographer Marion Meade referred to her as "an eccentric who abided by no rules except her own".[225] Lachman stated that Blavatsky exhibited what he referred to as "Russian traits - an intense devotion to spiritual truth, combined with a profound contradictory character."[36] Washington expressed the view that she was "a persuasive story-teller [with the] power to fascinate others" although noted that she was also "self-absorbed and egotistical."[226] Anthropologist Leo Klejn claimed that Blavatsky's indefatigability and energy were surprising.[227] Indologist Senkevich stated that Blavatsky's unordinary charisma exerted influence on Charles Massey and Stainton Moses.[228]

"[Blavatsky] talked incessantly in a guttural voice, sometimes wittily and sometimes crudely. She was indifferent to sex yet frank and open about it; fonder of animals than of people; welcoming, unpretentious, scandalous, capricious and rather noisy. She was also humorous, vulgar, impulsive and warm-hearted, and didn't give a hoot for anyone or anything."

— Biographer Peter Washington, 1993.[223]

Personal life

She appointed Besant to be the new head of the Blavatsky Lodge,[214] and in July 1890 inaugurated the new European headquarters of the Theosophical Society in Besant's house.[215] There, she authored a book containing questions and corresponding answers, The Key to Theosophy.[216] This was followed by The Voice of the Silence, a short devotional text which she claimed was based on a Senzar text known as The Book of the Golden Precepts. As with The Secret Doctrine, most scholars of Buddhism have doubted that this latter text was an authentic Tibetan Buddhist document,[217] although D. T. Suzuki thought it "real Mahayana Buddhism".[218] She continued to face accusations of fraud; U.S. newspaper The Sun published a July 1890 article based on information provided by an ex-member of the Society, Elliott Coues. Blavatsky sued the newspaper for libel, and they publicly retracted their accusations in September 1892.[219] That winter, Britain had been afflicted by an influenza epidemic, with Blavatsky contracting the virus; it led to her death on the afternoon of 8 May 1891, in Besant's house.[220] The date would come to be commemorated by Theosophists ever since as White Lotus Day.[221] Her body was cremated at Woking Crematorium on 11 May.[222]

In London, Blavatsky founded a magazine, controversially titling it Lucifer; in this Theosophical publication she sought to completely ignore claims regarding paranormal phenomena, and instead focus instead on a discussion of philosophical ideas.[205] Blavatsky also finished writing The Secret Doctrine, which was then edited by the Keightels.[206] As a commercial publisher willing to publish the approximately 1,500 page work could not be found, Blavatsky established the Theosophical Publishing Company, who brought out the work in two volumes, the first published in October 1888 and the second in January 1889.[207] Blavatsky claimed that the book constituted her commentary on the Book of Dzyan, a religious text written in Senzar which she had been taught while studying in Tibet.[208] Buddhologist David Reigle claimed that he identified Books of Kiu-te, including Blavatsky's Book of Dzyan as a first volume, as the Tantra section of the Tibetan Buddhist canon.[209] However, most scholars of Buddhism to have examined The Secret Doctrine have concluded that there was no such text as the Book of Dzyan, and that instead it was the fictional creation of Blavatsky's.[210] In the book, Blavatsky outlined her own cosmogonical ideas about how the universe, the planets, and the human species came to exist. She also discussed her views about the human being and their soul, thus dealing with issues surrounding an afterlife.[211] The two-volume book was reviewed for the Pall Mall Gazette by the social reformer Annie Besant; impressed by it, Besant met with Blavatsky and joined the Theosophists.[212] In August 1890, Blavatsky moved in to Besant's large house at 19 Avenue Road in St. John's Wood.[213]

In London, she established the Blavatsky Lodge as a rival to that run by Sinnett, draining much of its membership.[201] Lodge meetings were held at the Keightels' house on Thursday nights, with Blavatsky also greeting many visitors there, among them the occultist and poet W. B. Yeats.[202] In November 1889 she was visited by the Indian lawyer Mohandas Gandhi, who was studying the Bhagavad Gita with the Keightels. He became an associate member of Blavatsky's Lodge in March 1891, and would emphasize the close connection between Theosophy and Hinduism throughout his life.[203] In 1888, Blavatsky established the Esoteric Section of the Theosophical Society, a group under her complete control for which admittance was restricted to those who had passed certain tests. She identified it as a place for "true Theosophists" who would focus on the system's philosophy rather than experiment with producing paranormal phenomena.[204]

In 1886, by which time she was largely wheelchair-bound, Blavatsky moved to Ostend in Belgium, where she was visited by Theosophists from across Europe.[196] Supplementing her pension, she established a small ink-producing business.[197] She received messages from members of the Society's London Lodge who were dissatisfied with Sinnett's running of it; they believed that he was focusing on attaining upper-class support rather than encouraging the promotion of Theosophy throughout society, a criticism Blavatsky agreed with.[198] She arrived in London in May 1887, initially staying in the Norwood home of Theosophist Mabel Collins.[199] In September, she moved into the Holland Park home of fellow Theosophists, Bertram Keightley and his nephew Archibald Keightley.[200]

Blavatsky and Olcott in 1888

[195] However, Johnson has commented "Theosophists have overinterpreted this as complete vindication, when in fact many questions raised by Hodgson remain unanswered."[194][193] For decades after, Theosophists criticized Hodgson's methodology, arguing that he set out to disprove and attack Blavatsky rather than conduct an un-biased analysis of her claims and abilities. In 1986 the SPR admitted this to be the case and retracted the findings of the report.[192] In private letters, Blavatsky expressed relief that the criticism was focused on her and that the identity of the Masters had not been publicly exposed.[191] Blavatsky wanted to sue her accusers, although Olcott advised against it, believing that the surrounding publicity would damage the Society.[190] Settling in

Worsening health led Blavatsky contemplate a return to the milder climate of Europe, and resigning her position as corresponding secretary of the Society, she left India in March 1885.[185] By 1885, the Theosophical Society had experienced rapid growth, with 121 lodges having been chartered across the world, 106 of which were located in India, Burma, and Ceylon.[186] Initially, each lodge was chartered directly from the Adyar headquarters, with members making democratic decisions by vote.[186] However, over the coming years the lodges were organised into national units with their own ruling councils, resulting in tensions between the different levels of administration.[186]

Final years in Europe: 1885–91

While Blavatsky had been in Europe, trouble had broken out at the Society's Adyar headquarters in what came to be known as the Coulomb Affair.[181] The Society's Board of Control had accused Emma Coulomb of misappropriating their funds for her own purposes, and asked her to leave their center. She and her husband refused, blackmailing the Society with letters that they claimed proved that Blavatsky's paranormal abilities were fraudulent. The Society refused to pay them and expelled from their premises, at which the couple turned to the Madras-based Christian College Magazine, who published an expose of Blavatsky's alleged fraudulence using the Coulomb's claims as a basis. The story attracted international attention and was picked up by London-based newspaper, The Times.[182] In response, in November 1884 Blavatsky headed to Cairo, where she and Theosophist Charles Webster Leadbeater searched for negative information on Emma Coulomb, discovering stories of her alleged former history of extortion and criminality.[183][184]

Blavatsky had been diagnosed with [180]

Blavatsky standing behind Olcott (middle seated) and Damodar Mavalankar (seated to his left), Bombay, 1881

Theosophy was unpopular with both Christian missionaries and the ruling British establishment,[167] with India's English-language press being almost uniformly negative toward the Society.[168] The group nevertheless proved popular, and branches were established across the country.[169] While Blavatsky had emphasized its growth among the native Indian population rather than among the British elite, she moved into a bungalow in the Bombay suburb of Breach Candy, which was more accessibly to Western visitors.[169] Olcott had decided to establish the Buddhist Education Fund to combat the process of Christianization in Ceylon and encourage pride and interest in Buddhism among the island's Sinhalese population. Although Blavatsky initially opposed the idea, stating that the Masters would not approve, Olcott's project proved a success, and she changed her opinion about it.[170]

Upon learning that old comrade Emma Coulomb (née Cutting) and her husband had fallen into poverty in Ceylon, Blavatsky invited them to move into her home in Bombay.[159] However, the Coulombs annoyed Rosa Bates and Edward Winbridge, two American Theosophists who were also living with Blavatsky; when Blavatsky took the side of the Coulombs, Bates and Winbridge returned to the U.S.[160] Blavatsky was then invited to Simla to spend more time with Sinnett, and there performed a range of materializations that astounded the other guests; in one instance, she allegedly made a cup-and-saucer materialize under the soil during a picnic.[161] Sinnett was eager to contact the Masters himself, convincing Blavatsky to facilitate this communication, resulting in the production of over 1400 pages allegedly authored by Koot Hoomi and Morya, which came to be known as the Mahatma Letters.[162][163] Sinnett summarised the teachings contained in these letters in his book Esoteric Buddhism (1883), although scholars of Buddhism like Max Müller publicly highlighted that the contents were not Buddhist, and Blavatsky herself disliked the misleading title.[164] Since the book's publication, there has been much debate as to the authenticity of the letters, with some arguing that they were written by Blavatsky herself, and others believing that they were written by separate individuals.[165][166]

In July 1879, Blavatsky and Olcott began work on a monthly magazine, The Theosophist, with the first issue coming out in October.[152] The magazine soon obtained a large readership, with the management being taken over by Damodar K. Mavalankar, a Theosophist who introduced the idea of referring to the Masters as mahatmas.[153] In December, Blavatsky and Olcott traveled to Allahabad, there visiting Alfred Percy Sinnett, the editor of The Pioneer and keen Spiritualist. A.O. Hume was also a guest at the Sinnett's home, and Blavatsky was encouraged to manifest paranormal phenomena in their presence.[154] From there, they traveled to Benares, where they stayed at the palace of the Maharaja of Vizianagram.[155] Blavatsky and Olcott were then invited to Ceylon by Buddhist monks. There they officially converted to Buddhism, apparently the first Euro-Americans to do so,[156] taking the Five Precepts in a ceremony at Ramayana Nikayana in May 1880.[157] Touring the island, they met by crowds who were fascinated by these Westerners who were embracing Buddhism rather than proselytizing Christianity. Their message proved a boost to Sinhalese nationalist self-esteem, and they were invited to see the Buddha's Tooth in Kandy.[158]

Blavatsky and Hindu Theosophists in India

The Theosophical Society had established links with an Indian Hurrychund Chintamon before obtaining a house in Girgaum Road, part of Bombay's native area.[144] Associating largely with Indians rather than the governing British elite, Blavatsky took a fifteen-year-old Gujarati boy, Babula, as her personal servant.[145] Some educated Indians were impressed by the Theosophists rare championing of Indian religion under British rule; the main focus of the British in India was usually in missionary activities.[146] Her activity in the city was monitored by British intelligence services because of concern that the religious freedom of the Raj might spill over into proscribed political activities.[147] In April, Blavatsky took Olcott, Babula, and their friend Moolji to the Karla Caves, announcing that they contained secret passages that let to an underground place where the Masters assembled.[148] Then claiming that the Masters were telepathically commanding her to head to Rajputana in the Punjab, she and Olcott headed north.[149] At the Yamuna river, they met the sannyasin Babu Surdass, who had sat in the lotus position for 52 years, and in Agra saw the Taj Mahal.[150] In Saharanpur they met with Dayananda, before returning to Bombay.[151]

India: 1879–85

Revolving around Blavatsky's idea that all the world's religions stemmed from a single "Ancient Wisdom", which she connected to the Western esotericism of ancient London, and prominent figures like Thomas Edison and Abner Doubleday had joined.[139] In July 1878 Blavatsky gained U.S. citizenship.[139]

In summer 1875, Blavatsky began work on a book outlining her Theosophical worldview, much of which would be written while staying in the home of Hiram Corson, a Professor of English Literature at Cornell University. Although she had hoped to call it The Veil of Isis, it would be published as Isis Unveiled.[127] While writing it, Blavatsky claimed to be aware of a second consciousness within her body, referring to it as "the lodger who is in me", and stating that it was this second consciousness that inspired much of the writing.[128] In Isis Unveiled, Blavatsky quoted extensively from other esoteric and religious texts, although her contemporary and colleague Olcott always maintained that she had quoted from books that she did not have access to.[129] Writing more than a century after her death Lachman conjectured that if this had been the case, then she may have had an eidetic memory,[130] such that, while relying on earlier sources, the book represented an original synthesis that connected disparate ideas not brought together before.[131]

"The underlying theme among these diverse topics [in Isis Unveiled] is the existence of an ancient wisdom-religion, an ageless occult guide to the cosmos, nature and human life. The many faiths of man are said to derive from a universal religion known to both Plato and the ancient Hindu sages. The wisdom-religion is also identified with Hermetic philosophy as "the only possible key to the Absolute in science and theology" (I, vii). Every religion is based on the same truth or "secret doctrine," which contains "the alpha and omega of universal science" (I, 511). This ancient wisdom-religion will become the religion of the future (I, 613)."

— Historian Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke, 2004.[126]

At a Miracle Club meeting on 7 September 1875, Blavatsky, Olcott, and Judge agreed to establish an esoteric organisation, with Charles Sotheran suggesting that they call it the Theosophical Society.[119] The term theosophy came from the Greek theos ("god(s)") and sophia ("wisdom"), thus meaning "god-wisdom" or "divine wisdom".[120] The term was not new, but had been previously used in various contexts by the Philaletheians, Neo-Platonists, and the Christian mystic Jakob Böhme.[121] Theosophists would often argue over how to define Theosophy, with Judge expressing the view that the task was impossible.[120] Blavatsky however insisted that Theosophy was not a religion in itself.[122] Lachman has described the movement as "a very wide umbrella, under which quite a few things could find a place".[123] On foundation, Olcott was appointed chairman, with Judge as secretary, and Blavatsky as corresponding secretary, although she remained the group's primary theoretician and leading figure.[124] Prominent early members included Emma Hardinge Britten, Signor Bruzzesi, C.C. Massey and William L. Alden; many were prominent and successful members of the establishment, although not all would remain members for long.[125]

Drumming up interest for their ideas, Blavatsky and Olcott published a circular letter in Eldridge Gerry Brown's Boston-based Spiritualist publication, The Spiritual Scientist.[113] There, they named themselves the "Brotherhood of Luxor", a name potentially inspired by the pre-existing Hermetic Brotherhood of Luxor.[114] They began living together in a series of rented apartments in New York City, which they decorated with taxidermied animals and images of spiritual figures; their life was funded largely by Olcott's continued work as a lawyer.[115] Their last such apartment came to be known as the Lamasery.[116] Allegedly encouraged by the Masters, Blavatsky and Olcott established the Miracle Club, through which they facilitated lectures on esoteric themes in New York City.[117] It was through this group that they met an Irish Spiritualist, William Quan Judge, who shared many of their interests.[118]

Blavatsky was intrigued by a news story about William and Horatio Eddy, brothers based in Chittenden, Vermont, who it was claimed could levitate and manifest spiritual phenomena. She visited Chittenden in October 1874, there meeting the reporter Henry Steel Olcott, who was investigating the Eddy's claims for the Daily Graphic.[105] Claiming that Blavatsky impressed him with her own ability to manifest spirit phenomena, Olcott authored a newspaper article on her.[106] They soon became close friends, giving each other the nicknames of "Maloney" (Olcott) and "Jack" (Blavatsky).[107] He helped attract greater attention to Blavatsky's claims, encouraging the Daily Graphics' editor to publish an interview with her,[108] and discussing her in his book on Spiritualism, People from the Other World (1875),[109] which her Russian correspondent Alexandr Aksakov urged her to translate into Russian.[110] She began to instruct Olcott in her own occult beliefs, and encouraged by her he became celibate, tee-totaling, and vegetarian, although she herself was unable to commit to the latter.[111] In January 1875 the duo visited the Spiritualist mediums Nelson and Jennie Owen in Philadelphia; the Owens asked Olcott to test them to prove that the phenomena that they produced were not fraudulent, and while Olcott believed them, Blavatsky opined that they faked some of their phenomena in those instances when genuine phenomena failed to manifest.[112]

Blavatsky, c.1877

[104] Leaving Egypt, she proceeded to Syria, Palestine, and Lebanon, there encountering members of the

Blavatsky alleged that she departed Tibet with the mission of proving to the world that the phenomena identified by Spiritualists was objectively real, thus defending it against accusations of fraud made by scientific materialists. However, she also stated that the entities being contacted by Spiritualist mediums were not the spirits of the dead, as the Spiritualist movement typically alleged, but instead mischievous entities which existed on a plane of existence between the living and the dead.[88] She proceeded via the Suez Canal to Greece, where she met with another of the Masters, Hilarion.[89] She set sail for Egypt aboard the SS Eumonia, but in July 1871 it exploded during the journey; Blavatsky was one of only 16 survivors.[90] Reaching Cairo, she met up with Metamon, and with the help of a woman named Emma Cutting established a société spirite, which was based largely on Spiritism, a form of Spiritualism founded by Allan Kardec which professed a belief in reincarnation, in contrast to the mainstream Spiritualist movement.[91] However, Blavatsky believed that Cutting and many of the mediums employed by the society were fraudulent, and she closed it down after two weeks.[92] In Cairo, she also met with the Egyptologist Gaston Maspero, and another of the Masters, Serapis Bey.[93] It was also here that she met up with Metrovitch, although he soon died of typhoid, with Blavatsky claiming to have overseen the funeral.[94]


Embracing Spiritualism and establishing Theosophy: 1870–78

Many critics and biographers have expressed doubts regarding the veracity of Blavatsky's claims regarding her visits to Tibet, which rely entirely on her own claims, lacking any credible independent testimony.[82] It has been highlighted that during the nineteenth century, Tibet was closed to Europeans, and visitors faced the perils of bandits and a harsh terrain; the latter would have been even more problematic if Blavatsky had been as stout and un-athletic as she would be in later life.[83] However, as several biographers have noted, traders and pilgrims from neighboring lands were able to access Tibet freely, suggesting the possibility that she would have been allowed to enter accompanied by Morya, particularly if she had been mistaken for an Asian.[84] Blavatsky's eyewitness account of Shigatse was unprecedented in the West,[80] and one scholar of Buddhism, D. T. Suzuki, suggested that she later exhibited an advanced knowledge of Mahayana Buddhism consistent with her having studied in a Tibetan monastery.[85] Lachman noted that had Blavatsky spent time in Tibet, then she would be "one of the greatest travelers of the nineteenth century",[86] although added that "in all honesty I do not know" if Blavatsky spent time in Tibet or not.[87]

She claimed that in Tibet, she was taught an ancient, unknown language known as Senzar, and translated a number of ancient texts written in this language that were preserved by the monks of a monastery; she stated that she was, however, not permitted entry into the monastery itself.[78] She also claimed that while in Tibet, Morya and Koot Hoomi helped her develop and control her psychic powers. Among the abilities that she ascribed to these "Masters" were clairvoyance, clairaudience, telepathy, the ability to control another's consciousness, to dematerialize and rematerialize physical objects, and to project their astral bodies, thus giving the appearance of being in two places at once.[79] She claimed to have remained on this spiritual retreat from late 1868 until late 1870.[80] Blavatsky never claimed in print to have visited Lhasa, although this is a claim that would be made for her in various later sources, including the account provided by her sister.[81]

She claimed to have then received a message from Morya to travel to Constantinople, where he met her, and together they traveled overland to Tibet, going through Turkey, Persia, Afghanistan, and then into India, entering Tibet via Kashmir.[76] There, they allegedly stayed in the home of Morya's friend and colleague, Master Koot Hoomi, which was near to Tashilhunpo Monastery, Shigatse. According to Blavatsky, both Morya and Koot Hoomi were Kashmiris of Punjabi origin, and it was at his home that Koot Hoomi taught students of the Gelugpa sect of Tibetan Buddhism. Koot Hoomi was described as having spent time in London and Leipzig, being fluent in both English and French, and like Morya was a vegetarian.[77]

Tashilhunpo Monastery, Shigatse, the place that Blavatsky claimed held the Senzar texts she translated

After spending time in France and Germany, in 1858 she returned to her family, then based in Pskov.[67] She later claimed that there she began to exhibit further paranormal abilities, with rapping and creaking accompanying her around the house and furniture moving of its own volition.[68] In 1860 she and her sister visited their maternal grandmother in Tiflis. It was there that she met up with Metrovitch, and where she reconciled with Nikifor in 1862.[69] Together they adopted a child named Yuri, who would die aged five in 1867, when he was buried under Metrovitch's surname.[70] In 1864, while riding in Mingrelia, Blavatsky fell from her horse and was in a coma for several months with a spinal fracture. Recovering in Tiflis, she claimed that upon awaking she gained full control of her paranormal abilities.[71][72] She then proceeded to Italy, Transylvania, and Serbia, possibly studying the Cabalah with a rabbi at this point.[73] In 1867 she proceeded to the Balkans, Hungary, and then Italy, where she spent time in Venice, Florence, and Mentana, claiming that in the latter she had been injured fighting for Giuseppe Garibaldi at the Battle of Mentana.[74] According to Nandor Fodor, Blavatsky fought under Garibaldi, "disguised as a man."[75]

She later claimed that she then headed back to Europe by ship, surviving a shipwreck near to the Cape of Good Hope before arriving in England in 1854, where she faced hostility as a Russian citizen due to the ongoing Crimean War between Britain and Russia.[60] It was here, she claimed, that she worked as a concert musician for the Royal Philharmonic Society.[61] Sailing to the U.S., she visited New York City, where she met up with Rawson, before touring Chicago, Salt Lake City, and San Francisco, and then sailing back to India via Japan.[62] There, she spent time in Kashmir, Ladakh, and Burma, before making a second attempt to enter Tibet.[63] She claimed that this time she was successful, entering Tibet in 1856 through Kashmir, accompanied by a Tartar shaman who was attempting to reach Siberia and who thought that as a Russian citizen, Blavatsky would be able to aid him in doing so.[64] According to this account, they reached Leh before becoming lost, eventually joining a traveling Tartar group before she headed back to India.[65] She returned to Europe via Madras and Java.[66]

She made her way to Asia via the Americas, heading to Canada in autumn 1851. Inspired by the novels of James Fenimore Cooper, she sought out the Native American communities of Quebec in the hope of meeting their magico-religious specialists, but was instead robbed, later attributing these Natives' behavior to the corrupting influence of Christian missionaries.[56] She then headed south, visiting New Orleans, Texas, Mexico, and the Andes, before transport via ship from the West Indies to Ceylon and then Bombay.[57] She spent two years in India, allegedly following the instructions found in letters that Morya had sent to her.[58] She attempted to enter Tibet, but was prevented from doing so by the British administration.[59]

Helena Blavatsky, c.1850

She later claimed that in Constantinople she developed a friendship with a Hungarian opera singer named Agardi Metrovitch, whom she first encountered when saving him from being murdered;[49] many biographers believe that she was his mistress, that there was possibly an illegitimate child, and that the travels she claimed to engage in over the next years were in reality restricted to minor opera houses of the European continent in his company.[50] It was also in Constantinople that she met the Countess Sofia Kiselyova, who she would accompany on a tour of Egypt, Greece, and Eastern Europe.[51] In Cairo, she met the American art student Albert Rawson (1828-1902), who would come to write extensively about the Middle East,[52] and together they allegedly visited a Coptic magician, Paulos Metamon.[53] In 1851, she proceeded to Paris, where she encountered the Mesmerist Victor Michal, who impressed her.[54] From there, she visited England, and would claim that it was here that she met the "mysterious Indian" who had appeared in her childhood visions, a Hindu whom she referred to as the Master Morya. While she provided various conflicting accounts of how they met, locating it in both London and Ramsgate according to separate stories, she maintained that he claimed that he had a special mission for her, and that she must travel to Tibet.[55]

She did not keep a diary at the time, and was not accompanied by relatives who could verify her activities.[46] Thus, historian of esotericism Nicholas Goodrick-Clarke noted that public knowledge of these travels rests upon "her own largely uncorroborated accounts", which are marred by being "occasionally conflicting in their chronology".[47] According to biographer Peter Washington, at this point "myth and reality begin to merge seamlessly in Blavatsky's biography".[48]

Aged 17, Blavatsky agreed to marry Nikifor Vladimirovich Blavatsky, a man in his forties who worked as Vice Governor of Erivan Province. Her reasons for doing so were unclear, although she later claimed that she was attracted by his belief in magic.[41] Although she tried to back out shortly before the wedding ceremony, the marriage took place on 7 July 1849.[42] Moving with him to the Sardar Palace, she made repeated unsuccessful attempts to escape and return to her family in Tiflis, to which he eventually relented.[43] The family sent her, accompanied by a servant and maid, to Odessa to meet her father, who planned to return to Saint Petersburg with her. The escorts accompanied her to Poti and then Kerch, intending to continue with her to Odessa. Blavatsky claimed that, fleeing her escorts and bribing the captain of the ship that had taken her to Kerch, she reached Constantinople.[44] This marked the start of nine years spent traveling the world, possibly financed by her father.[45]

Blavatsky's drawing of a boat scene, produced in England in 1851[40]

World travels: 1849–69

According to some of her later accounts, in 1844–45 Blavatsky was taken by her father to England, where she visited London and Transcaucasia.[37] Blavatsky claimed that here she established a friendship with Alexander Vladimirovich Golitsyn, a Russian Freemason and member of the Golitsyn family who encouraged her interest in esoteric matters.[38] She would also claim that at this period she had further paranormal experiences, encountering her "mysterious Indian" in visions and astral traveling.[39]

She later claimed that in Saratov she discovered the personal library of her maternal great-grandfather, Prince Pavel Vasilevich Dolgorukov (d.1838); it contained a variety of books on esoteric subjects, encouraging her burgeoning interest in it.[30] Dolgorukov had been initiated into Rosicrucian Freemasonry in the late 1770s and had belonged to the Rite of Strict Observance, and rumors claimed that he had met both Count Cagliostro and Saint-Germain.[31] She would also later state that at this time of life she began to experience visions in which she encountered a "Mysterious Indian" man, and that in later life she would meet this man in the flesh.[32] Many biographers have considered this to be the first appearance of the "Masters" in her life story.[33]

The three surviving children were sent to live with their maternal grandparents in Saratov, where their grandfather Andrei had been appointed Governor of Saratov Governorate.[25] Richard Davenport-Hines described her as "a petted, wayward, invalid child" who was a "beguiling story-teller".[26] Accounts provided by relatives reveal that she socialized largely with lower-class children and that she enjoyed playing pranks and reading.[27] She was educated in French, art, and music, all subjects designed to enable her to find a husband.[28] With her grandparents she holidayed in Tumen's Kalmyk summer camp, where she learned horse riding and some Tibetan.[29]

[24] in June 1842, aged 28.tuberculosis The family proceeded to Poland and then back to Odessa, where Blavatsky's mother died of [23], where a brother, Leonid, was born in June 1840.Saratov They next moved to [22], where Blavatsky learned English from a British governess.Odessa As a result of her poor health, Blavatsky's mother moved to [21]

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.