World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Merger guidelines

Article Id: WHEBN0006339217
Reproduction Date:

Title: Merger guidelines  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: United States antitrust law, Mergers and acquisitions, Monopoly
Collection: Mergers and Acquisitions, United States Antitrust Law
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

Merger guidelines

The Merger guidelines are a set of internal rules promulgated by the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) in conjunction with the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). These rules, which have been revised a number of times in the past four decades, govern the extent to which these two regulatory bodies will scrutinize and/or challenge a potential merger on grounds of market concentration or threat to competition within a relevant market.

The merger guidelines have sections governing both horizontal integration and vertical integration.


  • History of the Merger guidelines 1
  • Notes 2
  • See also 3
  • External links 4

History of the Merger guidelines

The first merger guidelines set forth by the DOJ were the 1968 Merger Guidelines,[1] which remained largely unchanged until 1982. The 1968 guidelines were developed by former

  • Merger guidelines documents:
    • 1968 Merger Guidelines
    • 1984 Merger Guidelines
    • Non-horizontal Merger Guidelines1984
    • 1992 Merger Guidelines
    • 1992 Horizontal Merger Guidelines, with April 8, 1997, Revisions to Section 4 on Efficiencies
    • 1997 Merger Guidelines
    • 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines
  • Official DOJ commentary on the horizontal merger guidelines
  • 20th anniversary of the 1982 merger guidelines
  • FTC International antitrust coordinator Debra Valentine

External links

See also

  1. ^ , from the U.S. Department of Justice websiteMerger Guidelines1968
  2. ^ a b c Oliver E. Williamson, The Merger Guidelines of the U.S. Department of Justice-In Perspective. Accessed November 4, 2007.
  3. ^ a b Remarks of Assistant Attorney General Charles A. James.
  4. ^ Time magazine, "Guidelines for the Merger Thicket", June 28, 1982. Accessed September 12, 2007.
  5. ^ William J. Kolasky and Andrew R. Dick, The Merger Guidelines and the Integration of Efficiencies into Antitrust Review of Horizontal Mergers, 10 June 2002. Accessed September 12, 2007.
  6. ^ 1984 Merger Guidelines
  7. ^ 1992 Merger Guidelines
  8. ^ Joshua R. Wueller, Mergers of Majors: Applying the Failing Firm Doctrine in the Recorded Music Industry, 7 Brook. J. Corp. Fin. & Com. L. 589, 591–92 (2013) (describing section 11 of the 2010 Guidelines (and section 5.1 of the earlier 1997 Guidelines), which governs the failing firm doctrine for the FTC and DOJ).
  9. ^ 2010 Horizontal Merger Guidelines
  10. ^ Judd E. Stone & Joshua D. Wright, The Sound of One Hand Clapping: The 2010 Merger Guidelines and the Challenge of Judicial Adoption, 39 REV. IND. ORGAN. 145 (2011).
  11. ^ Id.
  12. ^ Leah Brannon & Kathleen Bradish, The Revised Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Can the Courts Be Persuaded?, THE ANTITRUST SOURCE, October 2010, at 4.
  13. ^ See J. Gregory Sidak & David J. Teece, Rewriting the Horizontal Merger Guidelines in the Name of Dynamic Competition, 16 GEO. MASON L. REV. 885 (2009),


The 1997 Horizontal Merger Guidelines were replaced with the most recent version in 2010. This version was released on August 19, 2010.[9] The 2010 Guidelines introduced the concept of "upward pricing pressure" resulting from a merger between competing firms. The 2010 revisions, while deemed by some to be an improvement,[10] have attracted some criticism from law and economics scholars. Some criticisms of the 2010 Guidelines include that the Guidelines do not update efficiencies analysis,[11] that courts may not adopt the Guidelines,[12] and that the Guidelines do not embody principles that reflect dynamic competition.[13]

The guidelines were revised again in 1984.[6] The only remaining portion of the 1984 guidelines which remains in effect is Section Four, which governs the examination of market effects of vertical integration. These guidelines were later replaced by the 1992 Merger Guidelines,[7] which represented a fine-tuning of previously established tools and policies, such as the SSNIP test and rules governing the acquisition of failing firms.[8] The 1992 Guidelines were revised in 1997, almost concurrently with the FTC's challenge of the Staples-Office Depot merger in federal court.

In 1982, Associate Attorney General Bill Baxter, under the authority of U.S. Attorney General William French Smith, released a new set of guidelines, which made heavier use of modern concepts of microeconomic theory, including the using the Herfindahl index to determine market concentration.[4] The newer guidelines took a more favorable view of economies of scale and efficiency of production as rationales for integration.[2] Moreover, they raised the level of market concentration necessary for the government to scrutinize mergers, effectively treating competition as a means to greater efficiency rather than as a goal in and of itself.[5] This was quite a controversial approach at the time: some antitrust lawyers saw it as a loosening of previous restraints on corporate consolidation, and some State Attorneys General responded to Baxter's changes by tightening merger enforcement at the state level.[3]


This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.