World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Metanarrative

Article Id: WHEBN0000319693
Reproduction Date:

Title: Metanarrative  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Metanarratives, Alexander Herzen, History of sociology, Postmodernism (international relations), Emancipation of the dissonance
Collection: Critical Theory, Literary Criticism, Metanarratives
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Metanarrative

A metanarrative in critical theory and particularly in postmodernism is a narrative about narratives of historical meaning, experience or knowledge, which offers a society legitimation through the anticipated completion of a (as yet unrealized) master idea.[1][2][3]

The term was brought into prominence by Jean-François Lyotard in 1984, with his claim that the postmodern was characterised precisely by a mistrust of the grand narratives (Progress, Enlightenment emancipation, Marxism) that had formed an essential part of modernity.[4]

Contents

  • Poststructuralist skepticism toward metanarratives 1
    • Replacing grand, universal narratives with small, local narratives 1.1
  • Narratology and communication 2
  • Criticism of Lyotard 3
  • See also 4
  • References 5
  • Further reading 6
  • External links 7

Poststructuralist skepticism toward metanarratives

In The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (1979), Lyotard highlights the increasing skepticism of the postmodern condition toward the totalizing nature of metanarratives and their reliance on some form of "transcendent and universal truth":[5]

Simplifying to the extreme, I define postmodern as incredulity toward metanarratives[. ..] The narrative function is losing its functors, its great hero, its great dangers, its great voyages, its great goal. It is being dispersed in clouds of narrative language[...] Where, after the metanarratives, can legitimacy reside?

Lyotard and other poststructuralist thinkers (like Foucault)[6] view this as a broadly positive development for a number of reasons. First, attempts to construct grand theories tend to unduly dismiss the naturally existing chaos and disorder of the universe, the power of the individual event.[7] Second, as well as ignoring the heterogeneity or variety of human existence, metanarratives are created and reinforced by power structures and are therefore untrustworthy.

Replacing grand, universal narratives with small, local narratives

Lyotard proposed that metanarratives should give way to petits récits, or more modest and "localized" narratives, which can 'throw off' the grand narrative by bringing into focus the singular event.[8] Borrowing from the works of Wittgenstein and his theory of the "models of discourse",[9] Lyotard constructs his vision of a progressive politics, grounded in the cohabitation of a whole range of diverse and always locally legitimated language-games.[10]

Postmodernists attempt to replace metanarratives by focusing on specific local contexts as well as on the diversity of human experience. They argue for the existence of a "multiplicity of theoretical standpoints"[11] rather than for grand, all-encompassing theories.

Narratology and communication

According to John Stephens and Robyn McCallum, a metanarrative "is a global or totalizing cultural narrative schema which orders and explains knowledge and experience"[12] - a story about a story, encompassing and explaining other "little stories" within conceptual models that make the stories into a whole. Postmodern narratives will often deliberately disturb the formulaic expectations such cultural codes provide,[13] pointing thereby to a possible revision of the social code.[14]

In [15]

The Consortium for Strategic Communication also maintains a website on master narratives.[16]

Criticism of Lyotard

It is unclear whether Lyotard is describing a global condition - skepticism towards metanarratives in postmodernity - or prescribing such skepticism - his critics pointing out the awkward fact for a descriptive viewpoint that clearly meta-narratives continue to play a major role in the current (postmodern) world.[17]

Critics have also argued that, in so far as one of Lyotard's targets was Science, he was mistaken in thinking science relies on a grand narrative for social and epistemic validation, rather than upon the accumulation of many lesser narrative successes.[18]

See also

References

  1. ^ J. Childers/G. Hentzi eds., The Columbia Dictionary of Modern Literary and Cultural Criticism (1995) p. 186
  2. ^ R. Appignanesi/C. Garratt, Postmodernism for Beginners (1995) p. 102-3
  3. ^ Jean-François Lyotard, The Postmodern Explained to Children (1992) p. 29
  4. ^ Childers p. 166-7
  5. ^ Lyotard, Jean-François. Introduction:The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge," 1979: xxiv-xxv.
  6. ^ G. Gutting ed., The Cambridge Companion to Foucault (2007) p. 36
  7. ^ C. Nouvet et al eds., Minima Moralia (2007) p. xii-iv
  8. ^ Nouvet, p. xvi
  9. ^ Hans Bertens, The Idea of the Postmodern: A History, Routledge, 1995, p124. ISBN 0-415-06011-7
  10. ^ Jean-Francois Lyotard, The Differend (1988) p. 151-161
  11. ^ Michael A. Peters, Poststructuralism, Marxism, and Neoliberalism: Between Theory and Politics, Rowman & Littlefield, 2001, p7. ISBN 0-7425-0987-7
  12. ^ Stephens, John and Robyn McCallum. (1998). Retelling Stories, Framing Culture: Traditional Story and Metanarratives in Children's Literature. ISBN 0-8153-1298-9.
  13. ^ J. W. Bertens/D. Fokkema, International Postmodernism (1997) p. 186
  14. ^ E. D. Ermath, Sequel to History (1992) p. 156
  15. ^ a b Halverson, Jeffry R., H.L. Goodall Jr. and Steven R. Corman. Master Narratives of Islamist Extremism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011. p. 14
  16. ^ http://www.comops.org/index.php
  17. ^ Metanarratives
  18. ^ J. W. Bertens/D. Fokkema, International Postmodernism (1997) p. 94

Further reading

  • Lyotard, Jean-François. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1984, reprint 1997. Translated by Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi.
  • David Carr, Time, Narrative, and History (Indiana UP 1986)
  • G. Bennington, Lyotard: Writing the Event (1988)

External links

A Postmodern Strategy: Language Games

This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.