World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

New mysterianism

Article Id: WHEBN0000720757
Reproduction Date:

Title: New mysterianism  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Philosophy of mind, Colin McGinn, Cognitive closure (philosophy), Hard problem of consciousness, Qualia
Collection: Consciousness Studies, Theories of Mind
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

New mysterianism

New mysterianism—or commonly just mysterianism—is a philosophical position proposing that the hard problem of consciousness cannot be resolved by humans. The unresolvable problem is how to explain the existence of qualia (individual instances of subjective, conscious experience). In terms of the various schools of philosophy of mind, mysterianism is a form of nonreductive physicalism. Some "mysterians" state their case uncompromisingly (Colin McGinn has said that consciousness is "a mystery that human intelligence will never unravel"); others believe merely that consciousness is not within the grasp of present human understanding, but may be comprehensible to future advances of science and technology.


  • Name 1
  • Philosophy 2
  • Adherents 3
  • Opponents 4
  • References 5
    • Citations 5.1
    • Other sources 5.2


Owen Flanagan noted in his 1991 book Science of the Mind that some modern thinkers have suggested that consciousness may never be completely explained. Flanagan called them "the new mysterians" after the rock group Question Mark and the Mysterians.[1] “But the new mysterianism is a postmodern position designed to drive a railroad spike through the heart of scientism”.[2] The term "new mysterianism" has been extended by some writers to encompass the wider philosophical position that humans do not have the intellectual ability to solve (or comprehend the answers to) many hard problems, not just the problem of consciousness, at a scientific level. This position is also known as anti-constructive naturalism.

According to Flanagan, “The ‘old mysterians’ were dualists who thought that consciousness cannot be understood scientifically because it operates according to nonnatural principles and possesses nonnatural properties.” Apparently, some apply the terms to thinkers throughout history who suggested some aspect of consciousness may not be knowable or discoverable, including Gottfried Leibniz, Samuel Johnson, and Thomas Huxley. Thomas Huxley wrote, "[H]ow it is that anything so remarkable as a state of consciousness comes about as a result of irritating nervous tissue, is just as unaccountable as the appearance of the Djinn, when Aladdin rubbed his lamp."[3]


In the view of the new mysterians, their contention that the hard problem of consciousness is unsolvable is not a presupposition, but rather a philosophical conclusion reached by thinking carefully about the issue. The standard argument is as follows:

Subjective experiences by their very nature cannot be shared or compared side-by-side. Therefore it is impossible to know what subjective experiences another person is having.

Noam Chomsky distinguishes between problems, which seem solvable, at least in principle, through scientific methods, and mysteries, which do not seem solvable, even in principle. He notes that the cognitive capabilities of all organisms are limited by biology, e.g. a mouse will never speak like a human. In the same way, certain problems may be beyond our understanding.


  • Colin McGinn is the leading proponent of the new mysterian position among major philosophers.[4]
  • Thomas Nagel, American philosopher.
  • John Searle, American philosopher.
  • Jerry Fodor, American philosopher and cognitive scientist.
  • Noam Chomsky, American linguist, philosopher, cognitive scientist, logician, and political commentator/activist.
  • Martin Gardner, American mathematics and science writer, considered himself to be a mysterian.
  • Steven Pinker, American psychologist; favoured mysterianism in How the Mind Works,[5] and later wrote: "The brain is a product of evolution, and just as animal brains have their limitations, we have ours. Our brains can't hold a hundred numbers in memory, can't visualize seven-dimensional space and perhaps can't intuitively grasp why neural information processing observed from the outside should give rise to subjective experience on the inside. This is where I place my bet, though I admit that the theory could be demolished when an unborn genius—a Darwin or Einstein of consciousness—comes up with a flabbergasting new idea that suddenly makes it all clear to us."[6]
  • Roger Penrose, English physicist, mathematician and philosopher of science.
  • John Derbyshire, American writer[7]


  • Daniel Dennett, American philosopher (has explicitly attacked McGinn's notion of mysterianism[8])



  1. ^
  2. ^ a b
  3. ^ The Elements of Physiology and Hygiene: A Text-book for Educational Institutions. D. Appleton, 1869, p. 178
  4. ^
  5. ^
  6. ^,9171,1580394-6,00.html
  7. ^ National Review
  8. ^ Dennett, Daniel (1991), "The Brain and Its Boundaries", Times Literary Supplement (London), 10 May issue. (Corrected by erratum notice, 24 May, pg 29.)

Other sources

  • McGinn, Colin (1991), The Problem of Consciousness
  • Flanagan, Owen (1991), The Science of the Mind, 2ed MIT Press, Cambridge
  • McGinn, Colin (1993), Problems in Philosophy: The Limits of Inquiry, Blackwell, ISBN 1-55786-475-6
  • Horgan, John (1996), The End of Science: Facing the Limits of Knowledge in the Twilight of the Scientific Age, Addison-Wesley; has a discussion of mysterianism (pp 177–180).
  • Blackburn, Simon (1999), Think: A Compelling Introduction to Philosophy, chapter two
  • Horgan, John (1999), The Undiscovered Mind, Phoenix, ISBN 0-7538-1098-0
  • McGinn, Colin (1999), The Mysterious Flame
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.