Quantum finance is an interdisciplinary research field, applying theories and methods developed by quantum physicists and economists in order to solve problems in finance. It is a branch of econophysics.
Contents

Background on instrument pricing 1

Background on quantum finance 2

Quantum continuous model 2.1

Quantum binomial model 2.2

Multistep quantum binomial model 2.3

BoseEinstein assumption 2.3.1

References 3

External links 4
Background on instrument pricing
Finance theory is heavily based on financial instrument pricing such as stock option pricing. Many of the problems facing the finance community have no known analytical solution. As a result, numerical methods and computer simulations for solving these problems have proliferated. This research area is known as computational finance. Many computational finance problems have a high degree of computational complexity and are slow to converge to a solution on classical computers. In particular, when it comes to option pricing, there is additional complexity resulting from the need to respond to quickly changing markets. For example, in order to take advantage of inaccurately priced stock options, the computation must complete before the next change in the almost continuously changing stock market. As a result, the finance community is always looking for ways to overcome the resulting performance issues that arise when pricing options. This has led to research that applies alternative computing techniques to finance.
Background on quantum finance
One of these alternatives is quantum computing. Just as physics models have evolved from classical to quantum, so has computing. Quantum computers have been shown to outperform classical computers when it comes to simulating quantum mechanics^{[1]} as well as for several other algorithms such as Shor's algorithm for factorization and Grover's algorithm for quantum search, making them an attractive area to research for solving computational finance problems.
Quantum continuous model
Most quantum option pricing research typically focuses on the quantization of the classical Black–Scholes–Merton equation from the perspective of continuous equations like the Schrödinger equation. Haven ^{[2]} builds on the work of Chen^{[3]} and others, but considers the market from the perspective of the Schrödinger equation. The key message in Haven's work is that the Black–Scholes–Merton equation is really a special case of the Schrödinger equation where markets are assumed to be efficient. The Schrödingerbased equation that Haven derives has a parameter ħ (not to be confused with the complex conjugate of h) that represents the amount of arbitrage that is present in the market resulting from a variety of sources including noninfinitely fast price changes, noninfinitely fast information dissemination and unequal wealth among traders. Haven argues that by setting this value appropriately, a more accurate option price can be derived, because in reality, markets are not truly efficient.
This is one of the reasons why it is possible that a quantum option pricing model could be more accurate than a classical one. Baaquie ^{[4]} has published many papers on quantum finance and even written a book^{[5]} that brings many of them together. Core to Baaquie's research and others like Matacz ^{[6]} are Feynman's path integrals.
Baaquie applies path integrals to several exotic options and presents analytical results comparing his results to the results of Black–Scholes–Merton equation showing that they are very similar. Piotrowski et al.^{[7]} take a different approach by changing the Black–Scholes–Merton assumption regarding the behavior of the stock underlying the option. Instead of assuming it follows a WienerBachelier process,^{[8]} they assume that it follows an OrnsteinUhlenbeck process.^{[9]} With this new assumption in place, they derive a quantum finance model as well as a European call option formula.
Other models such as HullWhite^{[10]} and CoxIngersollRoss^{[11]} have successfully used the same approach in the classical setting with interest rate derivatives. Khrennikov^{[12]} builds on the work of Haven and others and further bolsters the idea that the market efficiency assumption made by the Black–Scholes–Merton equation may not be appropriate. To support this idea, Khrennikov builds on a framework of contextual probabilities using agents as a way of overcoming criticism of applying quantum theory to finance. Accardi and Boukas^{[13]} again quantize the Black–Scholes–Merton equation, but in this case, they also consider the underlying stock to have both Brownian and Poisson processes.
Quantum binomial model
Chen published a paper in 2001,^{[3]} where he presents a quantum binomial options pricing model or simply abbreviated as the quantum binomial model. Metaphorically speaking, Chen's quantum binomial options pricing model (referred to hereafter as the quantum binomial model) is to existing quantum finance models what the CoxRossRubinstein classical binomial options pricing model was to the Black–Scholes–Merton modela discretized and simpler version of the same result. These simplifications make the respective theories not only easier to analyze but also easier to implement on a computer.
Multistep quantum binomial model
In the multistep model the quantum pricing formula is:
C_0^N=\mathrm{tr}[(\bigotimes_{j=1}^{N}\rho_j)^+]
which is the equivalent of the CoxRossRubinstein binomial options pricing model formula as follows:
C_0^N=(1+r)^{N}\sum_{n=0}^{N}\frac{N!}{n!(Nn)!}q^n{(1q)}^{Nn}
^+
This shows that assuming stocks behave according to MaxwellBoltzmann classical statistics, the quantum binomial model does indeed collapse to the classical binomial model.
Quantum volatility is as follows as per Meyer:^{[14]}
\sigma=\frac{\ln{(1+x_0+\sqrt{x_1^2+x_2^2+x_3^2})}}{\sqrt{1/t}}
BoseEinstein assumption
MaxwellBoltzmann statistics can be replaced by the quantum BoseEinstein statistics resulting in the following option price formula:
C_0^N=(1+r)^{N}\sum_{n=0}^{N}\left(\frac{q^n{(1q)}^{Nn}}{\sum_{k=0}^{N}q^k{(1q)}^{Nk}}\right)^+
The BoseEinstein equation will produce option prices that will differ from those produced by the CoxRossRubinstein option pricing formula in certain circumstances. This is because the stock is being treated like a quantum boson particle instead of a classical particle.
References

^ B. Boghosian (1998). "Simulating quantum mechanics on a quantum computer". Physica D.

^ Haven, Emmanuel (2002). "A discussion on embedding the Black–Scholes option pricing model in a quantum physics setting". Physica A.

^ ^{a} ^{b} Zeqian Chen (2004). "Quantum Theory for the Binomial Model in Finance Theory". Journal of Systems Science and Complexity.

^ Baaquie, Belal E.; Coriano, Claudio; Srikant, Marakani (2002). "Quantum Mechanics, Path Integrals and Option Pricing: Reducing the Complexity of Finance". ArXiv Condensed Matter eprints. p. 8191.

^ Baaquie, Belal (2004). Quantum Finance: Path Integrals and Hamiltonians for Options and Interest Rates. Cambridge University Press. p. 332.

^ "Path dependent option pricing, The path integral partial averaging method". Journal of Computational Finance. 2002.

^ Piotrowski, Edward W.; Schroeder, Małgorzata; Zambrzycka, Anna (2006). "Quantum extension of European option pricing based on the Ornstein Uhlenbeck process". Physica A (Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications) 368: 176.

^ Hull, John (2006). Options, futures, and other derivatives. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

^ "On the Theory of {B}rownian Motion". The Journal of Political Economy. 1930.

^ "The pricing of options on interest rate caps and floors using the HullWhite model". Advanced Strategies in Financial Risk Management. 1990.

^ "A theory of the term structure of interest rates". Physica A. 1985.

^ Khrennikov, Andrei (2007). "Classical and quantum randomness and the financial market" 0704. ArXiv eprints. p. 2865.

^ Accardi, Luigi; Boukas, Andreas. "The Quantum BlackScholes Equation".

^ Keith Meyer (2009). Extending and simulating the quantum binomial options pricing model. The University of Manitoba.
External links
This article was sourced from Creative Commons AttributionShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, EGovernment Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a nonprofit organization.