World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

Restricted open-shell Hartree–Fock

Article Id: WHEBN0003474088
Reproduction Date:

Title: Restricted open-shell Hartree–Fock  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Spin contamination, GAMESS (US), Unrestricted Hartree–Fock, Open shell, Fock matrix
Collection:
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Publication
Date:
 

Restricted open-shell Hartree–Fock

Restricted open-shell Hartree–Fock (ROHF) is a variant of Hartree–Fock theory for open shell molecules. It uses doubly occupied molecular orbitals as far as possible and then singly occupied orbitals for the unpaired electrons. This is the simple picture for open shell molecules but it is difficult to implement. The foundations of the ROHF method were first formulated by Roothaan in a celebrated paper [1] and then extended by various authors, see e.g.[2][3][4] for in-depth discussions.

As with restricted Hartree–Fock theory for closed shell molecules, it leads to Roothaan equations written in the form of a generalized eigenvalue problem

\mathbf{F} \mathbf{C} = \mathbf{S} \mathbf{C} \mathbf{\epsilon}

Where F is the so-called Fock matrix (which is a function of C), C is a matrix of coefficients, S is the overlap matrix of the basis functions, and \epsilon is the (diagonal, by convention) matrix of orbital energies. Unlike restricted Hartree–Fock theory for closed shell molecules, the form of the Fock matrix is not unique. Different so-called canonicalisations can be used leading to different orbitals and different orbital energies, but the same total wavefunction, total energy, and other observables.

In contrast to unrestricted Hartree–Fock (UHF), the ROHF wave function is a satisfactory eigenfunction of the total spin operator - \mathbf{S}^2 (i.e. no Spin contamination).

Developing post-Hartree–Fock methods based on a ROHF wave function is inherently more difficult than using a UHF wave function, due to the lack of a unique set of molecular orbitals.[5] However, different choices of reference orbitals have shown to provide similar results,[6] and thus many different post-Hartree–Fock methods have been implemented in a variety of electronic structure packages. Many (but not all) of these post-Hartree–Fock methods are completely invariant with respect to orbital choice (assuming that no orbitals are "frozen" and thus not correlated).[7] The ZAPT2 version of Møller–Plesset perturbation theory specifies the choice of orbitals.

References

  1. ^ Roothaan, C. C. J. (1960). "Self-consistent field theory for open shells of electronic systems". Rev. Mod. Phys. 32 (2): 179–185.  
  2. ^ Carbó, R.; Riera, J. M. (1978). "Historical Review". A General SCF Theory. Lecture Notes in Chemistry 5. Springer. pp. 1–4.  
  3. ^ McWeeny, R. (1992). Methods of Molecular Quantum Mechanics (2nd ed.). Academic Press.  
  4. ^ Plakhutin, B. N. (2002). Sen, K. D., ed. Reviews of Modern Quantum Chemistry 1. Word Scientific. pp. 16–42.  
  5. ^ Glaesemann, Kurt R.; Schmidt, Michael W. (2010). "On the Ordering of Orbital Energies in High-Spin ROHF†". The Journal of Physical Chemistry A 114 (33): 8772–8777.  
  6. ^ Jensen, F. (2007). Introduction to Computational Chemistry (2nd ed.). Wiley.  
  7. ^ Crawford, T. Daniel; Schaefer, Henry F.; Lee, Timothy J. (1996). "On the energy invariance of open-shell perturbation theory with respect to unitary transformations of molecular orbitals". The Journal of Chemical Physics 105 (3): 1060.  


This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and USA.gov, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for USA.gov and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
 
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
 
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.
 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.