World Library  
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Article

United States military chaplains

Article Id: WHEBN0034947281
Reproduction Date:

Title: United States military chaplains  
Author: World Heritage Encyclopedia
Language: English
Subject: Chief of Chaplains of the United States Army, Calvin Warburton, United States Air Force Chaplain Corps, Chaplain Corps (United States Army)
Publisher: World Heritage Encyclopedia

United States military chaplains

A Roman Catholic army chaplain celebrating a Mass for Union soldiers and officers during the American Civil War (1861–1865).

United States military chaplains hold positions in the armed forces of the United States and are charged with conducting religious services and providing counseling for their adherents. There are about 2,900 chaplains on active duty.[1]


Within the United States Department of Defense, the Armed Forces Chaplains Board (AFCB) advises the Secretary of Defense and the Under Secretary of Defense for Personnel and Readiness on religious, ethical, and moral matters, as well as policy issues affecting religious ministry and the free exercise of religion within the military services.[2] The three Chiefs of Chaplains and three active duty Deputy Chiefs of Chaplains of the Army, Navy, and Air Force are its members.[3]

A military chaplain must be endorsed by a religious organization in order to serve on active duty. In the contemporary U.S. military, endorsement is a complex area and many different paths are available. This religious endorsement must be maintained throughout the chaplain's military service and can be withdrawn at any time for religious or disciplinary reasons by the religious body with which the chaplain is affiliated,[4][5] though provisions exist for exceptional cases.[6][7] A military chaplain's rank is based on years of service and promotion selection from the appropriate peer group. Each is identified in uniform both by rank and religious affiliation insignia that indicate as well the branch of service.


Chaplains have served in the various branches of the United States armed forces since their formation, including in the Continental Army during the American Revolution. Congress authorized the hiring of an Army chaplain in 1791.[8]

General Carl Spaatz, the first Air Force Chief of Staff, ordered the institution of a separate Air Force chaplaincy on May 10, 1948.

The U.S. Marine Corps and the U.S. Coast Guard do not have their own chaplaincies, but are served by the Navy Chaplain Corps.[9]

Expanding role of military chaplains

In 1999, Rabbi Arnold E. Resnicoff, a US chaplain, proposed widening the chaplain's role to include that of engagement with local religious leaders in conflict zones to improve the military's understanding of local religious issues and include chaplains in the conflict prevention and reconciliation processes.[10] This outreach is part of the duties listed for chaplains in Joint Publication 1-05 on chaplain operations.

The Military Association of Atheists & Freethinkers supports expanding chaplain services to support atheists and humanists. Whether they are already required to support such non-theists is disputed. Chaplains are not trained to provide such support and often oppose doing so.[11][12]



Jewish Worship Pennant, flying over the National Ensign (American flag) on a US Navy ship.[13]

Two Harvard law students brought a suit in 1979 arguing that military chaplains should be replaced with non-combat volunteers or contractors. In Katcoff v. Marsh (1985),[14] the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit determined that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the suit and upheld the right of the military to employ chaplains. According to one analysis of the case, the court analysis described the First Amendment's free exercise clause and establishment clause as separate issues. It noted that only the wealthiest religious sects could provide chaplains for their adherents, effectively denying to other military personnel the "free exercise" of their religion.[15] The court also established guidelines for the military's chaplaincy programs, emphasizing the constitutional boundaries governing the program's administration and operations, including accommodating the rights and beliefs of each service member, and the avoidance of evangelizing and involuntary participation in religious observances.[16] A contrary view holds that the military chaplaincy violates two requirements of the establishment clause, neutrality and non-entanglement, by promoting ecumenism, conflating military and religious functions, and controlling expenditures.[17] It cited the difficulties faced by the Wisconsin Evangelical Lutheran since World War II in attempting to service its adherents in the military outside of the chaplaincy program rather than submit to military authority.[18]

Restrictions on religious observance or expression

Some have criticized what they feel is an effort upon the part of the United States military to put pressure upon chaplains to promote universalism, even if their personal religious beliefs and affiliation do not endorse the concept. On the other hand, many military leaders, including senior chaplains, have taken the position that the rights of others to their beliefs must be respected, without necessarily respecting the rightness (or truth) of their beliefs, which might be called pluralism rather than universalism. Chaplains in the United States, like all U.S. military officers, take an oath to protect and defend the constitution, which includes the right of religious free exercise. Chaplains are expected to support the rights of personnel of all faiths to their "free exercise of religion," while maintaining their own personal right to disagree with the beliefs of others.

A September 14, 2006, court-martial resulted in a reprimand and fine for US Navy Chaplain Lt. Gordon Klingenschmitt, an evangelical Protestant, who participated in uniform at a March 2006 protest in front of the White House, though he had been given a direct order not to wear his uniform. The protest was in support of his and other chaplains' complaint that the military restricted the free exercise of their religion by allowing only non-sectarian prayers at public ceremonies.[19]

Denominational favoritism

In August 2002, the D.C. District Court granted class action status to a lawsuit on the part 17 evangelical Protestant chaplains who challenged the Navy's chaplain-selection criteria.[20] They argued that the Navy adhered to a promotion formula that underrepresented "non-liturgical" Protestant chaplains by allotting positions in three equal parts—liturgical Protestant denominations such as Methodists, Lutherans, Episcopalians and Presbyterians; Catholics; and non-liturgical Protestant denominations such as Baptists, evangelicals, Bible churches, Pentecostals, charismatics and other faiths—though non-liturgical Protestants constitute far more than one-third of the Navy's service members.[21] In April 2007, the court held that the Navy had abandoned the thirds policy and that its current criteria were constitutional because the Navy has broad discretion to determine how to accommodate the religious needs of its service members. This decision was affirmed in 2008 by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit.


Numerous complaints have been made against chaplains for mandatory prayers, coercion, and using government money to promote Evangelical Christianity.[22][23][24][25][26] Atheists, whose religious position would not be represented by references to a generic God or in the "spiritual fitness" initiatives of the Army, have created groups to ensure the separation of church and state in the military.[22][27] Groups representing atheists have advocated the appointment of a non-believer to the chaplaincy.[28]

Sexual orientation

During the 1992 presidential campaign, the possibility of allowing gays and lesbians to serve openly in the U.S. military became a political issue. During the summer, Capt. Larry H. Ellis, a Navy chaplain, sent senior military officers and senior chaplains his analysis that said: "In the unique, intensely close environment of the military, homosexual conduct can threaten the lives, including the physical (e.g. AIDS) and psychological well-being of others". He called the presence of homosexuals in the military a "physical and psychological" threat. Advocates of the policy objected that the Department of Defense might exploit Ellis' role as a chaplain in opposing the policy: "It's as if the religious attribution somehow gives their argument more credibility."[29]

Chaplain groups and religious organizations took various positions on "[34][35][36]

In May 2011, revelations that an April Navy memo relating to its DADT training guidelines contemplated allowing same-sex weddings in base chapels and allowing chaplains to officiate if they so chose resulted in a letter of protest from 63 Republican congressman, citing the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) as controlling the use of federal property.[37] A Pentagon spokesperson replied that DOMA "does not limit the type of religious ceremonies a chaplain may perform in a chapel on a military installation", and a Navy spokesperson said that "A chaplain can conduct a same-sex ceremony if it is in the tenets of his faith".[38] A few days later the Navy rescinded its earlier instructions "pending additional legal and policy review and interdepartmental coordination."[39]

On September 30, 2011, Under Secretary of Defense [41] and Roman Catholics led by Archbishop Timothy Broglio of the Archdiocese for the Military Services, USA.[42]

Free speech

A January 5, 1991, letter to the Abilene Reporter-News from Lieutenant Colonel Garland Robertson, a Southern Baptist US Air Force chaplain who had served as a reconnaissance pilot during the Vietnam War, questioned the use of U.S. military force against Iraq. He wrote that "The need to use military force in this circumstance ... is an open issue." When reprimanded, he wrote a lengthy rebuttal that he shared with the press. Air Force officials noted that he identified himself by rank to the newspaper, when he could have written as a private citizen. Robertson's orders to relocate to Germany were canceled. He submitted to three psychological examinations, and was relieved of his pastoral duties. He was honorably discharged without benefits in September 1993 based on a record of "poor leadership". He told the New York Times: "If you're consistent with the teachings of your church, there will always be tensions between being a minister and being an officer".[43] He initiated a lawsuit and lost in both the District Court and the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals, which found his free speech rights had not been violated, noted that "a chaplain is a member of both military and religious denomination institutions", and reaffirmed the lower court's finding "that the conflict between the Air Force and [Robertson] as an Air Force chaplain does not establish a constitutional violation of the religion clauses."[44]

Chaplain deaths while on active duty

Death during service (combat and non-combat)[45]


See also


  1. ^ Christianity Today: Sarah Pulliam Bailey, "Chaplains Watch and Wait after DADT Ends," September 22, 2011, accessed March 5, 2012
  2. ^ Department of Defense, Personnel and Readiness: "Armed Forces Chaplains Board Mission, accessed March 5, 2012
  3. ^ Defense Technical Information Center: "DOD Instruction 5120.08," August 20, 2007, accessed March 5, 2012
  4. ^ Army Chaplain Corps: Requirements webpage. Retrieved 2010-09-09.
  5. ^ Air Force Chaplain Corps official website. Retrieved 2010-09-09.
  6. ^ If a chaplain notifies his or her endorsing agent in writing of intent to seek endorsement in a different faith group, the code of ethics of the National Conference on Ministry to the Armed Forces (NCMAF)—the principal organization of endorsing agents—requires the chaplain's current endorser to continue endorsement until the chaplain is able to meet requirements for endorsement by the second faith group unless there is a moral charge against the chaplain that would otherwise have resulted in revocation of endorsement. See [1] NCMAF Code of Ethics. Retrieved 2011-09-06.
  7. ^ [2] NCMAF Procedures for Change of Religious Body (Denomination) Endorsement. Retrieved 2011-09-06.
  8. ^ Kenneth Lasson, "Religious Liberty in the Military: The First Amendment under 'Friendly Fire'", Journal of Law and Religion, vol. 9, no. 2 (1992), 471–99, 493
  9. ^ United States Navy,
  10. ^ Greenberg, Eric J. (July 23, 1999). "Vatican Rep Accuses Israel Of 'Blood Libel,' Harsh Exchange Seen As Major Interfaith Setback". New York Jewish Week. Retrieved March 10, 2013. 
  11. ^
  12. ^
  13. ^ Per Navy customs, traditions and etiquette,  
  14. ^ Katcoff v. Marsh, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Retrieved 2010-09-09. See also Israel Drazin and Cecil B. Currey, For God and Country: The History of a Constitutional Challenge to the Army Chaplaincy (Hoboken, New Jersey: KTAV Publishing, 1995)
  15. ^ University of Toledo Law Review: at Twenty-One: The Military Chaplaincy and the Separation of Church and State", 1144-45Katcoff v. MarshRichard D. Rosen, ", retrieved 2010-09-09
  16. ^ Rosen, 1178
  17. ^ Julie B. Kaplan, "Military Mirrors on the Wall: Nonestablishment and the Military Chaplaincy," Yale Law Journal, vol. 95, no. 6 (May 1986), 1210-36, esp. 1212–19, 1227–32
  18. ^ Kaplan, "Military Mirrors," 1222-3
  19. ^ Washington Post: Alan Cooperman, "Navy Chaplain Guilty Of Disobeying an Order," September 15, 2006, accessed March 2, 2012. Military policies allow participation in such events by military personnel, so long as they did not wear uniforms or appear to be in attendance in a way that gives the appearance of endorsement by the military.
  20. ^ New York Times: "Evangelical Chaplains' Class-Action Suit Accuses Navy of Bias," August 22, 2002, accessed March 3, 2012
  21. ^ Stars and Stripes
  22. ^ a b MAAF (2009). Military Atheists Agnostics and Freethinkers. Retrieved November 28, 2010
  23. ^ LaGrone, S. (2008). "Soldier alleges religious bias at Lakenheath". Retrieved November 28, 2010
  24. ^ Military Religious Freedom Foundation (n.d.) Retrieved January 4, 2011
  25. ^ Jones, W. (2010). "Air Force Academy Cites Progress In Tackling Religious Intolerance", Huffington Post, Retrieved November 28, 2010]
  26. ^ Military Association of Atheists and Freethinkers (n.d.) Report on chaplains. Retrieved November 28, 2010
  27. ^ Military Religious Freedom Foundation (n.d.) Retrieved January 4, 2011
  28. ^ James Dao (2011-04-26). "Atheists Seek Chaplain Role in the Military".  
  29. ^ The New York Times: Eric Schmitt, "Marine Corps Chaplain Says Homosexuals Threaten Military," August 26, 1992, accessed February 27, 2012
  30. ^ "Baptists, Catholics Threaten to Withdraw Chaplains Over DADT," November 1, 2010, accessed February 16, 2012
  31. ^ Banks, Adelle M. (June 19, 2010). "Southern Baptists Convention fighting 'don't ask, don't tell' repeal". The Washington Post. 
  32. ^ Post Store (June 19, 2010). "Southern Baptists Convention fighting 'don't ask, don't tell' repeal". The Washington Post. Retrieved October 13, 2010. 
  33. ^ Washington Times: "Retired chaplains back 'don't ask'," October 31, 2010, accessed February 16, 2012
  34. ^ "Religious Organizations Support 'Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell' Repeal". HRC Back Story. April 28, 2010. Retrieved October 13, 2010. 
  35. ^ "Servicemembers Legal Defense Network". August 4, 2010. Retrieved October 13, 2010. 
  36. ^ Resnicoff, Arnold E. (July 14, 2010). "If gays serve openly, will chaplains suffer? No, the mission is to serve all troops.". USA Today. Retrieved October 13, 2010. 
  37. ^ ABC News: Devin Dwyer, "'Don't Ask, Don't Tell': Navy OKs Bases, Chaplains for Same-Sex Marriages After Repeal," May 10, 2011, accessed February 21, 2012
  38. ^ CNN: Charley Keyes, "Navy plan to allow same-sex marriage on bases draws opposition," May 9, 2011, accessed February 21, 2012
  39. ^ ABC News: Devin Dwyer, "Navy Scraps Rules on Gay Marriages After GOP Protest, " May 11, 2011, accessed February 21, 2011
  40. ^ CNN: Charley Keyes, "Military chaplains allowed to perform same-sex weddings," September 30, 2011, accessed February 21, 2012
  41. ^ Christian Post: Paul Stanley, "Evangelical Chaplains Refuse to Marry Gay Couples on Military Bases, October 6, 2011, accessed March 3, 2012
  42. ^ Army Times: Andrew Tilghman, "Church leader opposes DoD on same-sex weddings," September 30, 2011, accessed March 5, 2012
  43. ^ New York Times: Eric Schmitt, "Military Chaplain Fights A Battle Over Loyalties' December 21, 1993, accessed March 2, 2012
  44. ^ Robertson v. USA, May 1, 1998, accessed March 2, 2012
  45. ^ Phillips, Michael M. (2010-09-04). "A Chaplain and an Atheist Go to War". The Wall Street Journal. 
  46. ^ This count does not include Chaplain (Father) Tim Vakoc who died in September 2009, five years after he was critically wounded in Iraq.

Further reading

  • Jerry D. Aytry, Gun Totin' Chaplain (Airborne Press, 2006)
  • A. D. Betts, Experience of a Confederate Chaplain 1861–1865
  • Fr. Francis P. Duffy, Father Duffy's Story, (George H. Doran Company, 1919)
  • James D. Johnson, Combat Chaplain: A 30-Year Vietnam Battle (University of North Texas Press, 2001)
  • Rev. Edmund B. Tuttle, Encounters with Indians: Experiences of a U.S. Army Chaplain in Wyoming Territory, 1867–1870
  • Mark Pinsky (20 February 2013). "Military chaplains who died in the line of duty".  
  • Stephen L. Harris, Duffy's War: Fr. Francis Duffy, Wild Bill Donovan, and the Irish Fighting 69th in World War I (Potomac Books, 2006)
  • Israel A. S. Yost, Rebecca Salter, Monica Elizabeth Yost, Michael Markrich, Combat Chaplain: The Personal Story of the World War II Chaplain of the Japanese American 100th Battalion (University of Hawaii Press, 2006)

External links

  • Library of Congress audio and video history interviews of former US military chaplains
This article was sourced from Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional terms may apply. World Heritage Encyclopedia content is assembled from numerous content providers, Open Access Publishing, and in compliance with The Fair Access to Science and Technology Research Act (FASTR), Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., Public Library of Science, The Encyclopedia of Life, Open Book Publishers (OBP), PubMed, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Center for Biotechnology Information, U.S. National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health (NIH), U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, and, which sources content from all federal, state, local, tribal, and territorial government publication portals (.gov, .mil, .edu). Funding for and content contributors is made possible from the U.S. Congress, E-Government Act of 2002.
Crowd sourced content that is contributed to World Heritage Encyclopedia is peer reviewed and edited by our editorial staff to ensure quality scholarly research articles.
By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. World Heritage Encyclopedia™ is a registered trademark of the World Public Library Association, a non-profit organization.

Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.