World Library  


Add to Book Shelf
Flag as Inappropriate
Email this Book

Sub-grid Scale Representation of Vegetation in Global Land Surface Schemes: Implications for Estimation of the Terrestrial Carbon Sink : Volume 10, Issue 10 (17/10/2013)

By Melton, J. R.

Click here to view

Book Id: WPLBN0003990827
Format Type: PDF Article :
File Size: Pages 39
Reproduction Date: 2015

Title: Sub-grid Scale Representation of Vegetation in Global Land Surface Schemes: Implications for Estimation of the Terrestrial Carbon Sink : Volume 10, Issue 10 (17/10/2013)  
Author: Melton, J. R.
Volume: Vol. 10, Issue 10
Language: English
Subject: Science, Biogeosciences, Discussions
Collections: Periodicals: Journal and Magazine Collection (Contemporary), Copernicus GmbH
Historic
Publication Date:
2013
Publisher: Copernicus Gmbh, Göttingen, Germany
Member Page: Copernicus Publications

Citation

APA MLA Chicago

Arora, V. K., & Melton, J. R. (2013). Sub-grid Scale Representation of Vegetation in Global Land Surface Schemes: Implications for Estimation of the Terrestrial Carbon Sink : Volume 10, Issue 10 (17/10/2013). Retrieved from http://ebook2.worldlibrary.net/


Description
Description: Canadian Centre for Climate Modelling and Analysis, Environment Canada, Victoria, BC, V8W 2Y2, Canada. Terrestrial ecosystem models commonly represent vegetation in terms of plant functional types (PFTs) and use their vegetation attributes in calculations of the energy and water balance and to investigate the terrestrial carbon cycle. To accomplish these tasks, two approaches for PFT spatial representation are widely used: composite and mosaic. The impact of these two approaches on the global carbon balance has been investigated with the Canadian Terrestrial Ecosystem Model (CTEM v 1.2) coupled to the Canadian Land Surface Scheme (CLASS v 3.6). In the composite (single-tile) approach, the vegetation attributes of different PFTs present in a grid cell are aggregated and used in calculations to determine the resulting physical environmental conditions (soil moisture, soil temperature, etc.) that are common to all PFTs. In the mosaic (multi-tile) approach, energy and water balance calculations are performed separately for each PFT tile and each tile's physical land surface environmental conditions evolve independently. Pre-industrial equilibrium CLASS-CTEM simulations yield global totals of vegetation biomass, net primary productivity, and soil carbon that compare reasonably well with observation-based estimates and differ by less than 5% between the mosaic and composite configurations. However, on a regional scale the two approaches can differ by > 30%, especially in areas with high heterogeneity in land cover. Simulations over the historical period (1959–2005) show different responses to evolving climate and carbon dioxide concentrations from the two approaches. The cumulative global terrestrial carbon sink estimated over the 1959–2005 period (excluding land use change (LUC) effects) differs by around 5% between the two approaches (96.3 and 101.3 Pg, for the mosaic and composite approaches, respectively) and compares well with the observation-based estimate of 82.2 ± 35 Pg C over the same period. Inclusion of LUC causes the estimates of the terrestrial C sink to differ by 15.2 Pg C (16%) with values of 95.1 and 79.9 Pg C for the mosaic and composite approaches, respectively. Spatial differences in simulated vegetation and soil carbon and the manner in which terrestrial carbon balance evolves in response to LUC, in the two approaches, yields a substantially different estimate of the global land carbon sink. These results demonstrate that the spatial representation of vegetation has an important impact on the model response to changing climate, atmospheric CO2 concentrations, and land cover.

Summary
Sub-grid scale representation of vegetation in global land surface schemes: implications for estimation of the terrestrial carbon sink

Excerpt
Ajtay, M. J., Ketner, P., and Duvigneaud, P.: Terrestrial primary production and phytomass, in: The Global Carbon Cycle, SCOPE 13, edited by: Bolin, B., Degens, E. T., and Ketner, P., John Wiley & Sons, New York, 129–182, 1979.; Arora, V.: Modeling vegetation as a dynamic component in soil-vegetation-atmosphere transfer schemes and hydrological models, Rev. Geophys., 40, 3-1–3-26, doi:10.1029/2001RG000103, 2002.; Arora, V. K.: Simulating energy and carbon fluxes over winter wheat using coupled land surface and terrestrial ecosystem models, Agr. Forest Meteorol., 118, 21–47, doi:10.1016/S0168-1923(03)00073-X, 2003.; Arora, V. K. and Boer, G. J.: A parameterization of leaf phenology for the terrestrial ecosystem component of climate models, Glob. Change Biol., 11, 39–59, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00890.x, 2005.; Arora, V. K. and Boer, G. J.: Uncertainties in the 20th century carbon budget associated with land use change, Glob. Change Biol., 16, 3327–3348, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02202.x, 2010.; Arora, V. K., Boer, G. J., Christian, J. R., Curry, C. L., Denman, K. L., Zahariev, K., Flato, G. M., Scinocca, J. F., Merryfield, W. J., and Lee, W. G.: The effect of terrestrial phtosynthesis down regulation on the twentieth-century carbon budget simulated with the CCCma Earth System Model, J. Climate, 22, 6066–6088, doi:10.1175/2009JCLI3037.1, 2009.; Arora, V. K., Scinocca, J. F., Boer, G. J., Christian, J. R., Denman, K. L., Flato, G. M., Kharin, V. V., Lee, W. G., and Merryfield, W. J.: Carbon emission limits required to satisfy future representative concentration pathways of greenhouse gases, Geophys. Res. Lett., 38, L05805 doi:10.1029/2010GL046270, 2011.; Beer, C., Reichstein, M., Tomelleri, E., Ciais, P., Jung, M., Carvalhais, N., Rödenbeck, C., Arain, M. A., Baldocchi, D., Bonan, G. B., Bondeau, A., Cescatti, A., Lasslop, G., Lindroth, A., Lomas, M., Luyssaert, S., Margolis, H., Oleson, K. W., Roupsard, O., Veenendaal, E., Viovy, N., Williams, C., Woodward, F. I., and Papale, D.: Terrestrial gross carbon dioxide uptake: global distribution and covariation with climate, Science, 329, 834–838, doi:10.1126/science.1184984, 2010.; Brovkin, V., Boysen, L., Arora, V. K., Boisier, J. P., Cadule, P., Chini, L., Claussen, M., Friedlingstein, P., Gayler, V., van den Hurk, B. J. J. M., Hurtt, G. C., Jones, C. D., Kato, E., de Noblet-Ducoudrè, N., Pacifico, F., Pongratz, J., and Weiss, M.: Effect of anthropogenic land-use and land cover changes on climate and land carbon storage in CMIP5 projections for the 21st century, J. Climate, 26, 6859–6881, doi:10.1175/JCLI-D-12-00623.1, 2013.; Dickinson, R. E., Henderson-Sellers, A., and Kennedy, P.: Biosphere/Atmosphere Transfer Scheme (BATS) Version 1e as coupled to the NCAR Community Climate Model, Tech. rep., Climate and Global Dynamics Division, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado, 1993.; Essery, R. L. H., Best, M. J., Betts, R. A., Cox, P. M., and Taylor, C. M.: Explicit representation of subgrid heterogeneity in a GCM land surface scheme, J. Hydrometeorol., 4, 530–543, 2.0.CO;2>doi:10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<0530:EROSHI>2.0.CO;2, 2003.; FAO/IIASA/ISRIC/ISS-CAS/JRC: Harmonized World Soil Database (version 1.2), 2012.; Houghton, R. A., House, J. I., Pongratz, J., van der Werf, G. R., DeFries, R. S., Hansen, M. C., Le Quéré, C., and

 

Click To View

Additional Books


  • Long-term Trends of Water Chemistry in M... (by )
  • Isotopic Identification of Global Nitrog... (by )
  • Nitrogen Fixation in the Southern Ocean:... (by )
  • Multiple Quality Tests for Analysing Co2... (by )
  • Microbial Carbon Recycling: an Underesti... (by )
  • Biologically Labile Photoproducts from R... (by )
  • Organic N and P in Eutrophic Fjord Sedim... (by )
  • North Pacific-wide Spreading of Isotopic... (by )
  • Annual Follow-up of Carbon Dioxide and M... (by )
  • Coupling of the Spatial Dynamic of Picop... (by )
  • Yellow Substance and the Shades of Blue ... (by )
  • Effects of an Iron-light Co-limitation o... (by )
Scroll Left
Scroll Right

 



Copyright © World Library Foundation. All rights reserved. eBooks from World eBook Library are sponsored by the World Library Foundation,
a 501c(4) Member's Support Non-Profit Organization, and is NOT affiliated with any governmental agency or department.